Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Fri Apr 19, 2024 19:17

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Sep 07, 2011 21:35 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 02:17
Posts: 7355
Location: Highlands
CTV.ca Edmonton here
CTV.ca Edmonton wrote:
Councillor wants brakes on photo radar
A Strathcona County councillor wants to scrap photo radar.
Updated: Tue Sep. 06 2011 18:56:09

A Strathcona County councillor is suggesting that photo radar be phased out.
"We're making about $1.4 million dollars a year in revenue from photo radar side so that would go away but if we're doing it for revenue we're doing enforcement for the wrong reasons," said Brian Botterrill.

Botterill suggests safety is the real reason for enforcement, noting that a police officer can help improve driver education more than photo radar.
"From the safety perspective we can educate drivers a lot better with an officer than we can with photo radar.
Last year the county's photo radar contract cost more than $890,000. Botterill estimates hiring five more traffic enforcement officers could cost about $590,000.
"The five officers can cover quite a bit of territory, it increases our overall policing presence and it allows us to enforce a whole lot more than just the speed violations."

Botterill also notes that the dash-board camera can't catch someone driving a stolen vehicle, driving without insurance or a driver who is impaired.
Botterill has been studying traffic safety. He cites research showing 85 per cent of motorists drive a safe speed for the road, and for those who don't getting the demerits along with a ticket from an officer can go along way in changing driving habits.
Botterill's motion will be presented at Strathcona County council's meeting next Tuesday.

With files from Susan Amerongen
Good on him, for standing up and talking sense. :)

_________________
Safe Speed for Intelligent Road Safety through proper research, experience & guidance.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 08, 2011 09:34 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 11:07
Posts: 248
Bravo! Indeed traffic cops can educate and reason, a camera cannot.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 08, 2011 10:24 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 02:17
Posts: 7355
Location: Highlands
Precisely, although as a tool to fine indiscriminately all those that are over the legal limit it does provide that facility.
Trouble is that 'facility' is seriously flawed.

_________________
Safe Speed for Intelligent Road Safety through proper research, experience & guidance.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 08, 2011 12:56 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 11:07
Posts: 248
It is flawed. It is instant justice. It makes me very uncomfortable. It presumes that all drivers who exceed a predetermined limit deserve to be punished for it. Whereas a copper would punish those who were dangerous or irresponsible (well the good ones would - there are a few coppers out there who believe to exceed the limit is and of itself always worthy of punishment).


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.014s | 15 Queries | GZIP : Off ]