Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Sun Jun 14, 2026 15:03

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 31 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Jun 18, 2010 09:51 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 02:17
Posts: 7357
Location: Highlands
Press & Journal Here
Press & Journal Gary Cruden wrote:
Mum fears crossing accident could kill or injure youngster
parent claims driver came within inches of colliding with her baby’s pram
By Gary Cruden

WORRIED: Vanda Ray at the crossing with her daughters Amy, 8, and four-month-old Nikita . Kevin Emslie WORRIED: Vanda Ray at the crossing with her daughters Amy, 8, and four-month-old Nikita . Kevin Emslie

A worried parent has warned it is “just a matter of time” before a child is seriously injured or killed outside a north-east school.
Vanda Ray, 34, said drivers were ignoring the zebra crossing outside Portlethen Academy and speeding along Bruntland Road.
She claimed a driver came within inches of colliding with a pram containing her four-month-old daughter, Nikita, at the crossing last week.
But when she inquired about having a speed camera installed at the site she was told no action could be taken until someone was killed.

Mrs Ray, of Shinpark Circle, Portlethen, said: “My concern is that about 80% of cars and buses ignore the fact that anyone is at the crossing. People go straight through it.
“Last week I was waiting to go over the crossing and there were two cars coming. One stopped, the other sped up and missed the pram by inches.
“It’s one of the main routes to school for kids and it’s just a matter of time before a driver speeds through the crossing and hits one of them.
“It’s a ‘twenty’s plenty’ road and the speed cars are travelling at is ridiculous.” Mrs Ray said she had contacted Grampian Police, local councillors and the North East Safety Camera Partnership (Nescamp).
She added: “Nescamp told me that there was nothing they could do until there was a death,” .
A Nescamp spokesman said: “The locations which Nescamp conduct speed checks at have a proven road casualty record and the emphasis has to be at these locations where efforts can be made to reduce casualty levels.
“Bruntland Road, Portlethen, has neither a significant road casualty history, nor evidence of regular excessive speeds, which is why Nescamp do not operate in that area.”
Concerned

North Kincardine councillor Ian Mollison said: “I’m aware the community council has also been concerned and has had a number of people in touch.
“I have been in contact with the police and roads officials at the council and both are aware of the problem.”
He said the council would carry out a survey on the road following the school holidays to see if a light-controlled crossing would be more appropriate than the current one.
A council spokesman said the road was due to be resurfaced and more visible markings would be painted at the crossing as part of the works.
I am sure good research and an immediate regular attendance by Policeman would immediately change some attitudes and encourage better attention to the dangers.
Better overall education (public info films to remind road users & pedestrians of the correct behaviours & stop pedestrians 'just crossing' too), for all, will help remind all to take care, and go carefully. When going to cross waiting for a driver/rider to stop makes the situation safer and helps to warn other traffic of the hazard ahead.

_________________
Safe Speed for Intelligent Road Safety through proper research, experience & guidance.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 18, 2010 10:26 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
A worried parent wrote:
Vanda Ray, 34, said drivers were ignoring the zebra crossing outside Portlethen Academy and speeding along Bruntland Road.
She claimed a driver came within inches of colliding with a pram containing her four-month-old daughter, Nikita, at the crossing last week.

It would be wrong to assume that was the fault of the driver when judging purely on the event as described.

A worried parent wrote:
But when she inquired about having a speed camera installed at the site she was told no action could be taken until someone was killed.

She added: “Nescamp told me that there was nothing they could do until there was a death,” .

Like I said recently: the rules surrounding cost reduction has been ended, but the SCPs still follow them as recommendations such that they can capitalise on the subsequent Regression To The Mean fall after such a temporary blip, so they can continue to wrongly claim their cameras are effective.

_________________
Views expressed are personal opinions and are not necessarily shared by the Safe Speed campaign


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 18, 2010 11:56 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 21:10
Posts: 1693
Seems to me that this isnt a "speeding" issue as such, rather a "Not stopping at a Crossing" issue!

If (as is claimed) the majority of drivers are failing to stop then perhaps there is something wrong with the crossing! (Location, sightlines etc)

(It may also be a case of mothers testing for the presence of oncoming traffic by pushing pram into road and observing whether anything hits it! Something I see WAyyyy to often!)

_________________
"The road to a police state is paved with public safety legislation"


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 18, 2010 12:55 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 18:54
Posts: 4036
Location: Cumbria
As Steve says, they don't HAVE to wait until someone gets killed - they can put cameras anywhere they like, whenever they like! As it's "not about the money", I really can't see what's stopping them!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 18, 2010 13:33 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 13:55
Posts: 2247
Location: middlish
from google maps looks like no parking restrictions on either side of the road aside from the zig zags surrounding the crossing, care to hazard a guess what the parking is like at dropping off / pick up time ?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 18, 2010 13:49 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 04:10
Posts: 3244
From streetview there is more-than-ample parking, in bays.
And a 20mph limit at the school/academy.

_________________
The world runs on oil, period. No other substance can compete when it comes to energy density, flexibility, ease of handling, ease of transportation. If oil didn’t exist we would have to invent it.”

56 years after it was decided it was needed, the Bedford Bypass is nearing completion. The last single carriageway length of it.We have the most photogenic mayor though, always being photographed doing nothing


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 18, 2010 16:30 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 14:06
Posts: 3654
Location: Oxfordshire
Its pretty worrying that the general public now seem to think that a speed camera is a solution to non-speed-related forms of driving delinquency!

_________________
Regulation without education merely creates more criminals.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 18, 2010 16:49 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
Quote:
She claimed a driver came within inches of colliding with a pram containing her four-month-old daughter, Nikita, at the crossing last week.


Question "North East Safety Camera Partnership (Nescamp) ( sounds like an amalgamation of brands of coffee) should be asking -do these mothers need road safety training - the child in pram is too often being put in a position of danger ,rather than being held in a position of safety ,whilst the mothers check out the safety of crossing .

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 18, 2010 22:04 
Offline
Supporter
Supporter
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 13:45
Posts: 4042
Location: Near Buxton, Derbyshire
botach wrote:
Question "North East Safety Camera Partnership (Nescamp) ( sounds like an amalgamation of brands of coffee) should be asking -do these mothers need road safety training - the child in pram is too often being put in a position of danger ,rather than being held in a position of safety ,whilst the mothers check out the safety of crossing .


But a considerate driver should stop if they see a person with a pram or push-chair waiting to cross the road, especially at a marked crossing.

_________________
When I see an adult on a bicycle, I do not despair for the future of the human race. H.G. Wells
When I see a youth in a motor car I do d.c.brown


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 18, 2010 22:11 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
dcbwhaley wrote:
But a considerate driver should stop if they see a person with a pram or push-chair waiting to cross the road, especially at a marked crossing.

Indeed, but who is to say the person didn't make themselves 'seen'? I have seen people do just that - literally just step into the road without any indication.
Bad pedestrians (and cyclists) can be just as bad at signalling their intentions as bad drivers.

_________________
Views expressed are personal opinions and are not necessarily shared by the Safe Speed campaign


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 18, 2010 22:14 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 18:50
Posts: 673
dcbwhaley wrote:
botach wrote:
Question "North East Safety Camera Partnership (Nescamp) ( sounds like an amalgamation of brands of coffee) should be asking -do these mothers need road safety training - the child in pram is too often being put in a position of danger ,rather than being held in a position of safety ,whilst the mothers check out the safety of crossing .


But a considerate driver should stop if they see a person with a pram or push-chair waiting to cross the road, especially at a marked crossing.

DCB as always you are perfectly correct. What I am intrigued about is how on earth a speed camera could encourage this behaviour?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 18, 2010 22:19 
Offline
Supporter
Supporter
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 13:45
Posts: 4042
Location: Near Buxton, Derbyshire
Steve wrote:
dcbwhaley wrote:
But a considerate driver should stop if they see a person with a pram or push-chair waiting to cross the road, especially at a marked crossing.

Indeed, but who is to say the person didn't make themselves 'seen'? I have seen people do just that - literally just step into the road without any indication.
Bad pedestrians (and cyclists) can be just as bad at signalling their intentions as bad drivers.



I would regard a person standing at the road side with a pram at right angles to the road as giving a clear intention of their wish to cross the road and would stop for them. How else can a pram pusher indicate their intention to cross the road?

_________________
When I see an adult on a bicycle, I do not despair for the future of the human race. H.G. Wells
When I see a youth in a motor car I do d.c.brown


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 18, 2010 22:25 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 12:26
Posts: 36
Location: UK
Looking at street view It seems that the road surface and road markings need some work done to them. I wonder what it is like in bright sunlight and low light/heavy rain as well.
And also what speed were the 'speeding' cars doing ?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 18, 2010 22:55 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
dcbwhaley wrote:


I would regard a person standing at the road side with a pram at right angles to the road as giving a clear intention of their wish to cross the road and would stop for them. How else can a pram pusher indicate their intention to cross the road?



PROBLEM - they DON'T STOP AT SIDE OF ROAD --they push pram into road ,then protest when little Nikita or Darwin is in the firing line .It's not the ones who try to protect their kids who cause the problem ,but those who abuse the push chair that ARE the problem .

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 18, 2010 23:38 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
dcbwhaley wrote:
I would regard a person standing at the road side with a pram at right angles to the road as giving a clear intention of their wish to cross the road and would stop for them. How else can a pram pusher indicate their intention to cross the road?

Again a valid argument in itself, but again it is based on an assumption.

Have you really never seen folk just suddenly decide to want to step out into a road without any prior indication before-hand? I do a fair amount of walking, so I have ample opportunity to watch others. Not everyone chooses to stand at 'right angles' so indicating their intention. Others just rush into it expecting passing traffic to literally stop on a dime. Like I said in an another relevant thread, to you: "Yes some cars continue through but, just like at lights, I don't expect drivers to go out of their way with heavy braking."; this could be where our heroine failed.

_________________
Views expressed are personal opinions and are not necessarily shared by the Safe Speed campaign


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 08:46 
Offline
Supporter
Supporter
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 13:45
Posts: 4042
Location: Near Buxton, Derbyshire
botach wrote:
PROBLEM - they DON'T STOP AT SIDE OF ROAD --they push pram into road ,then protest when little Nikita or Darwin is in the firing line .It's not the ones who try to protect their kids who cause the problem ,but those who abuse the push chair that ARE the problem .


Fair enough. On the few occasions I drove a pushchair I would always pull it when crossing a road.

_________________
When I see an adult on a bicycle, I do not despair for the future of the human race. H.G. Wells
When I see a youth in a motor car I do d.c.brown


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 09:03 
Offline
Supporter
Supporter
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 13:45
Posts: 4042
Location: Near Buxton, Derbyshire
Steve wrote:
Have you really never seen folk just suddenly decide to want to step out into a road without any prior indication before-hand?


I can't sensibly continue this discussion until you answer my question which can be rephrased as: what prior indication do you expect? In my experience it is difficult to step into the road without, even if not deliberately, giving some indication - body language, position and movement.

_________________
When I see an adult on a bicycle, I do not despair for the future of the human race. H.G. Wells
When I see a youth in a motor car I do d.c.brown


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 10:05 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
dcbwhaley wrote:
Steve wrote:
Have you really never seen folk just suddenly decide to want to step out into a road without any prior indication before-hand?


I can't sensibly continue this discussion until you answer my question which can be rephrased as: what prior indication do you expect? In my experience it is difficult to step into the road without, even if not deliberately, giving some indication - body language, position and movement.

I thought I had already implicitly answered your question: "a valid argument in itself". Also, it seems you missed a glaring subtlety. Regardless, that shouldn't prevent you from answering my own simple question.

To amplify: I agreed with your "I would regard a person standing at the road side with a pram at right angles to the road as giving a clear intention of their wish to cross the road" and is what I expect (your question is again answered). The subtlety is contained within your words, specifically the word "standing"; this implies an amount of time spent in that position, as opposed to simply walking into the crossing. It is unreasonable to expect traffic to have instantly stopped immediately following the first moment that someone looks around (or enters the crossing) - this is why I referenced an earlier post. The mum in question may have had an unreasonable expectation.
Furthermore, she likely would have turned the pram on the rear wheels (the turning pivot point) to be at right angles to the crossing, hence lifting the front of the pram possibly over the curb, hence explaining her "missed the pram by inches" comment.

Remember, folks are meant to check the road is safe to cross, even when they have priority/right of way on a crossing (remember this is a Zebra). It makes me wonder how that particular near miss by "inches" could have occurred if one was being reasonably careful.

_________________
Views expressed are personal opinions and are not necessarily shared by the Safe Speed campaign


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 10:36 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 19:08
Posts: 3434
I must admit that I have had cars go across crossings in front of me when I have been half way across (I actually hit a car with a rolled up newspaper I was holding, once,they were that close to me) but it's imposible to say, in this case, if she was actually on the crossing at the time or just about to cross and got shirty because the car did not stop immediately for her.

People get emotional and imagine things to be worse than they actually are sometimes. We had a case about a year ago when one of the main roads was closed for about a month and traffic started using a lesser B road. Some woman actually wrote in to the paper and said "she had been forced off the road twice in two days by oncoming traffic "speeding" along this road. (its a wide country road with ability for two hgvs to pass each other comfortably and capable of 50MPH for it's entirety).
Now I've never been "forced off the road" in many miles of driving so this lady was either VERY unlucky or VERY emotional....which?

_________________
My views do not represent Safespeed but those of a driver who has driven for 39 yrs, in all conditions, at all times of the day & night on every type of road and covered well over a million miles, so knows a bit about what makes for safety on the road,what is really dangerous and needs to be observed when driving and quite frankly, the speedo is way down on my list of things to observe to negotiate Britain's roads safely, but I don't expect some fool who sits behind a desk all day to appreciate that.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 11:29 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 04:10
Posts: 3244
Both crossings have railings before and after.
Anyone [driving] approaching the crossing/s would have their view limited by the end-on view of the railings.
Especially anything low-down, like a push-chair or a child.

_________________
The world runs on oil, period. No other substance can compete when it comes to energy density, flexibility, ease of handling, ease of transportation. If oil didn’t exist we would have to invent it.”

56 years after it was decided it was needed, the Bedford Bypass is nearing completion. The last single carriageway length of it.We have the most photogenic mayor though, always being photographed doing nothing


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 31 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.020s | 10 Queries | GZIP : Off ]