Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Fri Apr 24, 2026 21:56

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 22:52 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2004 11:36
Posts: 113
Location: Lincolnshire
Quote:
A new road safety campaign is being launched in the Cotswolds after the number of accident deaths doubled over the last year.


Quote:
Although the overall number of casualties is falling in the Cotswolds, the collisions resulting in fatal injuries are still on the increase, according to the group.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 23:12 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 22:02
Posts: 3266
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/glou ... 077719.stm

_________________
Speed limit sign radio interview. TV Snap Unhappy
“It has never been the rule in this country – I hope it never will be - that suspected criminal offences must automatically be the subject of prosecution” He added that there should be a prosecution: “wherever it appears that the offence or the circumstances of its commission is or are of such a character that a prosecution in respect thereof is required in the public interest”
This approach has been endorsed by Attorney General ever since 1951. CPS Code


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 23:44 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
County councillor wrote:
roads in themselves are not dangerous, but it is the way in which some people use them.

I think that's worthy of discussion.

Can a road never be dangerous?

_________________
Views expressed are personal opinions and are not necessarily shared by the Safe Speed campaign


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 05, 2007 01:40 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
smeggy wrote:
County councillor wrote:
roads in themselves are not dangerous, but it is the way in which some people use them.

I think that's worthy of discussion.

Can a road never be dangerous?


Intelligent definitions of 'dangerous' are founded on measurements of risk - or statistics of crashes, which are in turn measurements of risk.

So of course a car, a driver or a road can be 'dangerous' relative to their respective peers.

But there's meaning in the councillor's ill chosen words. He's saying that the vast majority of crashes are caused by road user error. He's also absolving himself of the responsibility to create a safe environment, which is slightly scary.

Everyone involved has a DUTY. The local authority (or the Highways Agency) has a duty to make the road safe. Drivers have a duty to use the road safely and DfT has a duty to foster safe behaviour from all through policy. Failure in any of these duties does not absolve the others from their respective duties.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 05, 2007 01:52 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 00:42
Posts: 832
smeggy wrote:
County councillor wrote:
roads in themselves are not dangerous, but it is the way in which some people use them.
I think that's worthy of discussion. Can a road never be dangerous?

Same drivers use other roads and have a lower risk of accidents, so the quality of the road must be a contributing factor.
.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 05, 2007 10:03 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 21:10
Posts: 1693
Dr L wrote:
smeggy wrote:
County councillor wrote:
roads in themselves are not dangerous, but it is the way in which some people use them.
I think that's worthy of discussion. Can a road never be dangerous?

Same drivers use other roads and have a lower risk of accidents, so the quality of the road must be a contributing factor.
.


At a somewhat simplistic level.

A "Safe" road is one that is safer than it looks.

A "Dangerous" road is one that looks safer than it actually is.

(EG A streight clear road with a hidden dip! There is one near where I live that has a dip big enough to hide an HGV! anyone unfamiliar with the road could easily feel safe to over take only to find themselves driving at speed into the front of a truck)

_________________
"The road to a police state is paved with public safety legislation"


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 05, 2007 10:26 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 00:42
Posts: 832
Dusty wrote:
Dr L wrote:
smeggy wrote:
County councillor wrote:
roads in themselves are not dangerous, but it is the way in which some people use them.
I think that's worthy of discussion. Can a road never be dangerous?

Same drivers use other roads and have a lower risk of accidents, so the quality of the road must be a contributing factor.
.

(EG A straight clear road with a hidden dip! There is one near where I live that has a dip big enough to hide an HGV! anyone unfamiliar with the road could easily feel safe to over take only to find themselves driving at speed into the front of a truck)

Have the same near where I live, but it is well signed and I have not heard of any serious accidents there in recent times.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 05, 2007 11:03 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 21:10
Posts: 1693
Quote:
Have the same near where I live, but it is well signed and I have not heard of any serious accidents there in recent times.


To be fair, this one is quite well signposted as well, But it is still somewhat alarming to see an HGV rise up out of the tarmac even when you are expecting it!

_________________
"The road to a police state is paved with public safety legislation"


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 05, 2007 11:46 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 01:48
Posts: 526
Location: Netherlands
SafeSpeed wrote:
smeggy wrote:
County councillor wrote:
roads in themselves are not dangerous, but it is the way in which some people use them.

I think that's worthy of discussion.

Can a road never be dangerous?


Intelligent definitions of 'dangerous' are founded on measurements of risk - or statistics of crashes, which are in turn measurements of risk.

So of course a car, a driver or a road can be 'dangerous' relative to their respective peers.

But there's meaning in the councillor's ill chosen words. He's saying that the vast majority of crashes are caused by road user error. He's also absolving himself of the responsibility to create a safe environment, which is slightly scary.

Everyone involved has a DUTY. The local authority (or the Highways Agency) has a duty to make the road safe. Drivers have a duty to use the road safely and DfT has a duty to foster safe behaviour from all through policy. Failure in any of these duties does not absolve the others from their respective duties.

Paul, allow me to praise you on this excellent post. You really must write a book.

_________________
p.s. I am still absolutely floored by Paul's death. May 2008 be the greatest ever for SafeSpeed. His spirit lives on.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 05, 2007 17:09 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
supertramp wrote:
Paul, allow me to praise you on this excellent post. You really must write a book.


Thanks again for your kind words. I admit I was quite pleased with that particular post. :)

Background work on the book continues but key to real progress is finding the right publisher.

Finding the time to write the book is challenging, to say the least. Assistance from an editor and a marketing department - not to mention a publisher's advance - would speed progress considerably.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 26 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.051s | 14 Queries | GZIP : Off ]