Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Tue Jul 28, 2026 18:33

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 08:05 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 22:02
Posts: 3266
http://www.thisishampshire.net/news/dai ... months.php

Quote:
Teenage rider given 36 speeding tickets in two months
A TEENAGE moped rider clocked up 36 speeding tickets in two months, Fareham Youth Court heard.

The brazen 17-year-old was caught hurtling along four roads with speed cameras, and on one occasion even made an offensive gesture at one as he roared past.

The mechanic was snapped in Gosport, Fareham, and three streets in Portsmouth, where he roared around a circuit on his own. He was eventually collared after film of the teenager's antics was passed on to the police by the safety partnership.

advertisementIn court, the youth - who cannot be named for legal reasons - claimed he thought he could not have exceeded the speed limit because he was riding a 50cc bike, and his speedometer had been smashed in an accident.

The 17-year-old admitted 36 speeding summonses and one charge of driving without due care and attention, and was banned from driving for 12 months, fined £250 and told to pay £140 costs.

Magistrate Coreen Irwin told him: "This was a total disregard for any of the laws and you have shown absolutely no responsibility for the way you rode."


Now that is a bit of a bargin.

_________________
Speed limit sign radio interview. TV Snap Unhappy
“It has never been the rule in this country – I hope it never will be - that suspected criminal offences must automatically be the subject of prosecution” He added that there should be a prosecution: “wherever it appears that the offence or the circumstances of its commission is or are of such a character that a prosecution in respect thereof is required in the public interest”
This approach has been endorsed by Attorney General ever since 1951. CPS Code


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 08:44 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
article wrote:
...three streets in Portsmouth



claimed he thought he could not have exceeded the speed limit because he was riding a 50cc bike,

So the blinding flashes of the front facing Truvelos (the only fixed type used in Pompey) weren’t a bit of a clue then? :roll:

_________________
Views expressed are personal opinions and are not necessarily shared by the Safe Speed campaign


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 11:41 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 16:04
Posts: 816
Did they actually speed test the moped? A 50cc moped is supposed to be restricted to 30mph. If it was going faster then they would have had more reasons to prosecute him. If not ... :roll:

_________________
Prepare to be Judged


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 12:38 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 18:50
Posts: 673
That's a first for me, seeing the word hurtling used in relation to a 50cc moped.

What next, speed demon tortoises?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 12:44 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 22:02
Posts: 3266
I recon he should have received 37 X £60(=2200) + £35 Costs £2255 :D

_________________
Speed limit sign radio interview. TV Snap Unhappy
“It has never been the rule in this country – I hope it never will be - that suspected criminal offences must automatically be the subject of prosecution” He added that there should be a prosecution: “wherever it appears that the offence or the circumstances of its commission is or are of such a character that a prosecution in respect thereof is required in the public interest”
This approach has been endorsed by Attorney General ever since 1951. CPS Code


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 12:47 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 16:04
Posts: 816
anton wrote:
I recon he should have received 37 X £60 + £35 Costs £2255


Quote:
The brazen 17-year-old was caught hurtling along four roads with speed cameras


So that would be 4 x £60 + £35 costs = £275

_________________
Prepare to be Judged


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 334 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.042s | 13 Queries | GZIP : Off ]