dcbwhaley wrote:
whynot wrote:
I would agree with Claire. Although the course may have contained some useful information for a lot of drivers, its main function was a "Brain Washing" exercise.
No. Anything but. It started with the fact that speed cameras exist; that if you get caught exceeding the speed limit you will be in trouble; then this is how to avoid breaking the speed limit. No analysis of why speed cameras are in place.
There are number of events that take place in those that attend a course. (To varying degrees) There is the fact that you have been 'caught out' - and you have this opportunity to redeem yourself, by attending this course.
You have already submitted in your-self (not you Dave necessarily - but 'one') to do the course. Most people will like to get something positive out of it aas it costs money and time to attend. So our natural instinct is to try and look positively at the situation so that it is less of a punishment and more of a positive experience.
That has the audience about 50% toward an 'open' and hopeful experience.
By stating at the beginning that they will not discuss the 'crimes' the audience to a degree is relieved, they will not be 'embarrassed in front of others. That helps to 'dis-arm' many of the potential sceptics. We like to fit in so it also helps to collate the group. So they have a group of people who want to get through the day easily.
The scene is set. Now all they need to do is to present a plausible and reasonable sounding 'education' to seem worthwhile and acceptable. Not that some of the sections and 'teaching' cannot be useful ot even valuable, but the slant is you listen we teach. So you buy into the system.
Anyone that might ask my posed point would be seen as the outsider and make everyone feel awkward, as they wish to go through this process / day as well as possible.
For example you state
dcbwhaley wrote:
...then this is how to avoid breaking the speed limit
- well what have they actually taught you to ensure absolutely that you will never ever once commit this offence again ? (I am being serious not flippant).
Always glance frequently at your speedo, and learn how 20 - 30 etc 'feels' so that you can accurately forever be perfect?
Have they taught you how to look for speedvans and police accurately and so never get caught again, learning how to slow every time your view is impaired?
Or have they drummed into you throughout the few hours, that you mustn't speed, without any real ways of how to prevent doing so?
Upon reflecting what and how they taught you, can you now see what you did 'wrong' when you commit your 'crime', and can now see how you will now fall foul of that trap again and any other failure to stick to the limit precisely? Do you now think that what you did was terribly dangerous or do you think that your driving was safe and OK or that you were wrong and driving dangerously - or just being like all the other drivers - generally driving safely?
dcbwhaley wrote:
For an analogy. A self defence course would start with the assumption the muggers exist; if you get mugged you will be sad; here is how to avoid getting mugged. No analysis of the social factors which cause scallies to mug people..
Having been on both a self defence course after a stabbing on the college campus that I attended and also been on a (drivers) mobile security course, that is not what either started with it is about not looking vulnerable. (I can talk a lot about it! - in another thread one day).
If you are mugged you will be scared and feel vulnerable and potentially requiring medical attention (physical and mental) not sad. Actually they do discuss the types of people that may try, and how to watch out for the ways in which we (as victims) may present opportunities and thus how to avoid them. Then what to do if you find that you are in a vulnerable position and how to asap get out of it or defend yourself if you are presented with real danger.
it was all about not making yourself a victim and how to act and knowledge to get out of dangerous situations as well as not getting into them, so yes it does cover the how's why's and wherefores.