Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Wed Apr 29, 2026 09:22

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 366 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 15, 16, 17, 18, 19
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 09, 2008 19:04 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 16:34
Posts: 4923
Location: Somewhere between a rock and a hard place
Not just this thread but, I am getting more and more concerned about the quality of posts.

Yes, I know I'm a fine one to talk because I've screwed-up on occasion but I hope that I recognise when I have been out of order and have the decency to explain or apologise where appropriate.

It's not easy to understand people and their true motives on a forum! Of this, I am certain.

But anyone reading this thread, and other threads, with new eyes IMVHO would see - weepej bashing.


Tell me I'm wrong?


So...


weepej - can you say something, anything, you like or respect about, for instance, Bombus?

Bombus - do you hate everything weepej stands for? Has he never made a post, or part of, with which you agree?


I feel like I have a 1st class honours degree in apologising, but you know what - I don't find it difficult.

Even family can fall out but I have learned that the two people who will tell you the truth are your worst enemy and your best friend.


I have never felt so uncomfortable on SS as I feel right now! :cry:


I'm beginning to lose faith and interest in posting here, not because I don't believe in SS or will withdraw my support!!!, but because of the rancour and hatred I see even when a good post or point is made - by anyone!

I don't expect anyone to agree, but I see this as plainly as the words on my screen.

_________________
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not necessarily represent the views of Safe Speed.
You will be branded a threat to society by going over a speed limit where it is safe to do so, and suffer the consequences of your actions in a way criminals do not, more so than someone who is a real threat to our society.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 09, 2008 19:50 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 22:50
Posts: 3267
ed_m wrote:
weepej wrote:
Cor, becuase my words have been twisted....


just for clarity, can you confirm who you beleive has twisted your words?


The subject moved on from me suggesting I don't wan't cars to pass too fast and too close (but if they're going to pass close I'd rather they did it at 30 than 40), to people suggesting that I'd prefer cars to pass cyclists too slowly, when I'd prefer them too pass me at a good speed (so they're not along side me for too long), and not too close.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 09, 2008 19:54 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 16:51
Posts: 1323
Location: Stafford - a short distance past hope
weepej wrote:
ed_m wrote:
weepej wrote:
Cor, becuase my words have been twisted....


just for clarity, can you confirm who you beleive has twisted your words?


The subject moved on from me suggesting I don't wan't cars to pass too fast and too close (but if they're going to pass close I'd rather they did it at 30 than 40), to people suggesting that I'd prefer cars to pass cyclists too slowly, when I'd prefer them too pass me at a good speed (so they're not along side me for too long), and not too close.


I can't find anything wrong with weepej's point here - he doesn't want cars dawdling past him but he feels if people are going to pass him too closely he would prefer a lower speed? Seems fair enough to me.

_________________
I won't slave for beggar's pay,
likewise gold and jewels,
but I would slave to learn the way
to sink your ship of fools


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 09, 2008 20:09 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 16:34
Posts: 4923
Location: Somewhere between a rock and a hard place
prof beard wrote:
weepej wrote:
ed_m wrote:
weepej wrote:
Cor, becuase my words have been twisted....


just for clarity, can you confirm who you beleive has twisted your words?


The subject moved on from me suggesting I don't wan't cars to pass too fast and too close (but if they're going to pass close I'd rather they did it at 30 than 40), to people suggesting that I'd prefer cars to pass cyclists too slowly, when I'd prefer them too pass me at a good speed (so they're not along side me for too long), and not too close.


I can't find anything wrong with weepej's point here - he doesn't want cars dawdling past him but he feels if people are going to pass him too closely he would prefer a lower speed? Seems fair enough to me.


Thank you prof :clap: :bow:

I was begining to think I'm losing the plot.

_________________
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not necessarily represent the views of Safe Speed.
You will be branded a threat to society by going over a speed limit where it is safe to do so, and suffer the consequences of your actions in a way criminals do not, more so than someone who is a real threat to our society.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 09, 2008 22:09 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 13:55
Posts: 2247
Location: middlish
prof beard wrote:
weepej wrote:
ed_m wrote:
weepej wrote:
Cor, becuase my words have been twisted....


just for clarity, can you confirm who you beleive has twisted your words?


The subject moved on from me suggesting I don't wan't cars to pass too fast and too close (but if they're going to pass close I'd rather they did it at 30 than 40), to people suggesting that I'd prefer cars to pass cyclists too slowly, when I'd prefer them too pass me at a good speed (so they're not along side me for too long), and not too close.


I can't find anything wrong with weepej's point here - he doesn't want cars dawdling past him but he feels if people are going to pass him too closely he would prefer a lower speed? Seems fair enough to me.


just asking the question.... since i responded to weepej's post, and his next one referred to his words being twisted.

that wasnt my intention so i thought i'd see if it was me.

the post i responded too was perhaps open to interpretation either way.

i don't think i suggested he was 'wrong' and not sure anyone else has (?) just offered an alternative pov.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 10, 2008 14:54 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 10:30
Posts: 2053
Location: South Wales (Roving all UK)
weepej wrote:
civil engineer wrote:
I've been in london for just over a month now and can honestly say that cyclists are a menace. I've had a number of very close calls when cyclists have done some mind boggling things.


And you didn't notice the cars and trucks (and pedestrians) also doing mind boggling things?


Not to the same degree no.

I've seen some truely heartstopping things.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 366 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 15, 16, 17, 18, 19

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 69 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.028s | 11 Queries | GZIP : Off ]