Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Tue Jun 23, 2026 20:02

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 76 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 00:35 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2005 17:56
Posts: 189
Location: Essex
Agree with everyone else here on how clueless these council people are.

Follow this link to see Jeremy Clarkson's view on this - very funny :lol:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 09:23 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 22:47
Posts: 1511
Location: West Midlands
Anyone watch Question Time last night?

They were all banging on (again) about how it's 4x4's that are the most polluting. Not one person (Panel or audience) put forth a counter-argument to the fact that it's not necessarily true...

Having said that, I'd still like to see urban 4x4's banned...

_________________
Pecunia Prius Equitas et Salus


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 09:40 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 18:41
Posts: 893
BottyBurp wrote:
Having said that, I'd still like to see urban 4x4's banned...

Why? Can you, without referring to appearance, give criteria you would use to impose the ban?

_________________
Will


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 09:44 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 22:47
Posts: 1511
Location: West Midlands
willcove wrote:
BottyBurp wrote:
Having said that, I'd still like to see urban 4x4's banned...

Why? Can you, without referring to appearance, give criteria you would use to impose the ban?

It's nothing to do with the actual car - it's more to do with the 4x4 driver attitude. In my experience, urban 4x4 drivers are very aggressive drivers - they seem to think that the bullbars are there to intimidate others to get out of their way and maybe the driver feels invincible.

I realise this is stereo-typing, but that's my experience...

_________________
Pecunia Prius Equitas et Salus


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 09:50 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 14:26
Posts: 4364
Location: Hampshire/Wiltshire Border
willcove wrote:
BottyBurp wrote:
Having said that, I'd still like to see urban 4x4's banned...

Why? Can you, without referring to appearance, give criteria you would use to impose the ban?


Never mind that. Just define "urban".

Still, I'd like to see those (20x more dangerous than cars) motorcycles banned. It's the attitude of the riders I don't like ...

_________________
Malcolm W.
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not represent the views of Safespeed.


Last edited by malcolmw on Fri Oct 27, 2006 09:53, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 09:53 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 22:47
Posts: 1511
Location: West Midlands
malcolmw wrote:
willcove wrote:
BottyBurp wrote:
Having said that, I'd still like to see urban 4x4's banned...

Why? Can you, without referring to appearance, give criteria you would use to impose the ban?


Never mind that. Just define "urban".

Town or city...

The reason I said urban, was to distinguish from rural areas or areas where a 4x4 is useful and has practical advantages...

_________________
Pecunia Prius Equitas et Salus


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 09:59 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 14:26
Posts: 4364
Location: Hampshire/Wiltshire Border
So, I lve in a country village. I want to go into my local big town to take my infirm mother to the shops. I only have a 4x4 . What should I do?

:)

_________________
Malcolm W.
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not represent the views of Safespeed.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 10:01 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 00:45
Posts: 1016
Location: Mighty Tamworth
Once again this is miss informed people.

Electric cars still pollute.
What about the environmental costs of making everyone buy new “environmentally friendly cars” how much CO2 is produced in the manufacture of cars? If you buy a used petrol car rather than a new hybrid, surly this is more environmentally friendly.

I cannot understand how electric or hybrid cars are better for the environment.
What is used in to make the battery of the electric car- how does it get disposed of?
In Hybrid cars you make an engine and a battery powered motor so you manufacture two power pants for the car.

If you want to tax the amount CO2 produced by cars surly you must consider the amount of CO2 to produce the thing and the amount of CO2 it produces in it's life.

_________________
Oct 11 Birmingham Half Marathon. I am running for the British Heart Foundation.
http://www.justgiving.com/Rob-Taylor


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 10:01 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 15:05
Posts: 1225
Location: Glasgow
BottyBurp wrote:
Having said that, I'd still like to see urban 4x4's banned...


malcolmw wrote:
Still, I'd like to see those (20x more dangerous than cars) motorcycles banned. It's the attitude of the riders I don't like ...


Divide and conquer! It's a fantastic tactic to use to manipulate the ignorant in order to drive a hidden agenda. The whole discussion has nothing to do with anything other than taxing people they think they can cream more money off.

Clarkson's sarcastic comments about giving away free tickets to the MPH show to 4x4 owners and charging electric car owners £1million entry puts the point accross perfectly - there is no underlying argument beyond prejudice. Richmond council are doing this simply because they think they can.....

His point about communist dictatorship is bang-on too!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 10:12 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 15:05
Posts: 1225
Location: Glasgow
ree.t wrote:
Electric cars still pollute.
What about the environmental costs of making everyone buy new “environmentally friendly cars” how much CO2 is produced in the manufacture of cars? If you buy a used petrol car rather than a new hybrid, surly this is more environmentally friendly.

I cannot understand how electric or hybrid cars are better for the environment.
What is used in to make the battery of the electric car- how does it get disposed of?
In Hybrid cars you make an engine and a battery powered motor so you manufacture two power pants for the car.

If you want to tax the amount CO2 produced by cars surly you must consider the amount of CO2 to produce the thing and the amount of CO2 it produces in it's life.


Spot on (although I'm sure you meant power plants :D)

I had a discussion yesterday with a well-intentioned but sadly indoctrinated probationer teacher yesterday regarding recycling a disused fridge sitting in one of our offices. I explained to her, using the fridge as an example, that often recycling will consume more energy than constructing and using a newer, more efficient to run and produce item.

The coolant used in the old fridge is of a type that has since been superceded, and new fridges consume far less electrical energy because they use more efficient coolant gasses, so in their lifetime it would be will be more 'environmentally friendly' simply to chuck the old one away.

She went into 'la la la, I'm not listening' mode.... :roll:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 10:32 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 18:41
Posts: 893
BottyBurp wrote:
It's nothing to do with the actual car - it's more to do with the 4x4 driver attitude. In my experience, urban 4x4 drivers are very aggressive drivers - they seem to think that the bullbars are there to intimidate others to get out of their way and maybe the driver feels invincible.

I realise this is stereo-typing, but that's my experience...

So, you wish to ban something that you cannot define purely because of your own perceptions and prejudices?

FWIW, most drivers of 4x4s where I live are very courteous (but then most drivers here are courteous, full stop). The most agressive drivers seem to be young (which implies inexperience) or police officers :roll:

However, a local road is a favourite with bikers. Its sweeping curves attract them like flies to a honey-pot every summer weekend and they terrorise the neighbourhood tearing down that road, often well in excess of the speed limit and often on the wrong side of the road. Now a call to ban all bikes because of the actions of a small minority has the same (or less) validity as your wish to ban 4x4s from towns and cities.

_________________
Will


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 10:34 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
r11co wrote:
The coolant used in the old fridge is of a type that has since been superceded, and new fridges consume far less electrical energy because they use more efficient coolant gasses, so in their lifetime it would be will be more 'environmentally friendly' simply to chuck the old one away.


No, I don't think so. The CFC refrigerant gases we used to use were quite a bit better than the modern replacements. We stopped using them because of the ozone layer. I have believed that this change was justified, but on the basis of modern junk science, maybe we were robbed there too.

Modern improvements in fridges come mainly from better insulation I think.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 10:41 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 15:05
Posts: 1225
Location: Glasgow
SafeSpeed wrote:
No, I don't think so. The CFC refrigerant gases we used to use were quite a bit better than the modern replacements. We stopped using them because of the ozone layer. I have believed that this change was justified, but on the basis of modern junk science, maybe we were robbed there too.

Modern improvements in fridges come mainly from better insulation I think.


Sorry, I should have said. The fridge in question is 'post CFC' and uses one of the first generation alternatives, plus I'm pretty sure the reason it isn't functioning any more is because the gas has escaped.

The point is it would be more 'energy saving' to have a new fridge rather than get the existing one recharged with the less efficient coolant it is compatible with, or have it modified to accept the newer refrigerants.


Last edited by r11co on Fri Oct 27, 2006 10:50, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 10:43 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
r11co wrote:
Divide and conquer! It's a fantastic tactic to use to manipulate the ignorant in order to drive a hidden agenda. The whole discussion has nothing to do with anything other than taxing people they think they can cream more money off.


Divide and conquer, certainly. But I think the underlying motivation is car hatred, and they are starting by 'ring fencing' a 'softer' target.

It's INCITING HATRED and we shouldn't stand for it. Unfortunately it's mainly off-topic for Safe Speed - but I will be saying 'inciting hatred' every time I get the chance.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 10:59 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 13:36
Posts: 1339
I would remind everyone that this proposal does not mention 4x4s at all. It mentions the vague term "gas guzzlers" which on closer inspection includes Fiestas and similar family cars.

I would bet that the misinterpretation of this as only applying to 4x4s is exactly what they intended, giving them much undeserved and unwitting support for a very different agenda.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 11:04 
Offline
New User
New User

Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 10:58
Posts: 1
Location: Cheshire
I think I have spotted the flaw in the Richmond plan

Neil Herron reckons its illegal and that there is a previous upheld complaint against a council that tried to do something similar.

The 1984 Traffic Regulation Act makes it illegal for an LA to charge more for a permit than the admin cost of its provision.

see here for Neils comment

http://tinyurl.com/v9qty

Perhaps banning the Richmond Lib Dems from talking would have a greater effect on greenhouse emissions.

As always

Mark


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 11:26 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 22:47
Posts: 1511
Location: West Midlands
willcove wrote:
So, you wish to ban something that you cannot define purely because of your own perceptions and prejudices?

No - it's because of my own experiences, which is why I mad it bold in my original posting. I also said that I realised it was stereotyping, but I can't help my thoughts or actions based on my own experiences. Similar to how I feel when I'm approaching a potentially hazardous road junction - I draw on my past experiences to enable me to navigate it safely...

Similarly, I don't like certain sectors of our society, because in my experience, they've always been troublesome...

_________________
Pecunia Prius Equitas et Salus


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 11:30 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 22:47
Posts: 1511
Location: West Midlands
willcove wrote:
However, a local road is a favourite with bikers. Its sweeping curves attract them like flies to a honey-pot every summer weekend and they terrorise the neighbourhood tearing down that road, often well in excess of the speed limit and often on the wrong side of the road. Now a call to ban all bikes because of the actions of a small minority has the same (or less) validity as your wish to ban 4x4s from towns and cities.

Perhaps I didn't make my point clear. I'm not against the 4x4 as a vehicle - I'm against the 'type' of driving that I experience from an urban 4x4 driver.

_________________
Pecunia Prius Equitas et Salus


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 11:59 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 15:05
Posts: 1225
Location: Glasgow
BottyBurp wrote:
I'm not against the 4x4 as a vehicle - I'm against the 'type' of driving that I experience from an urban 4x4 driver.


That's called stereotyping!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 12:35 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 18:41
Posts: 893
BottyBurp wrote:
Perhaps I didn't make my point clear. I'm not against the 4x4 as a vehicle ...
While in a previous post,
BottyBurp wrote:
Having said that, I'd still like to see urban 4x4's banned...

:?
FWIW, this seems to be the case each time I investigate why a particular person is against 4x4s. They're not against 4x4s but are against a particular type of person or sector of society that their prejudice (often erroneously) associates with 4x4 ownership.

For every excuse the anti-4x4 brigade choose to "justify" their incitement of social hatred and their anti-social behaviour, something other than a 4x4 is worse than any 4x4 and many 4x4s fare better than many non-4x4 types. Behaviour similar to that of the anti-4x4 brigade has led to some of the worst attocities in human history, and so should not be tolerated.

_________________
Will


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 76 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.037s | 11 Queries | GZIP : Off ]