Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Tue Oct 28, 2025 17:26

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Oct 16, 2005 05:09 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 17:10
Posts: 23
Location: Bristol
I cannot understand for the life of me what South Glos Council were thinking when they decided to remove the foot bridge outside Filton College in favour of a Pelican crossing? this foot bridge has been there for as long as i remember (i'm 26) I'm guessing it was erected to provide a 'safe passage' for students to cross to the north bound bus stops without a pelican crossing interferring with a main arterial route. I know there have been a couple of collisions on this 'T' Junction over recent years due to students being too lazy to use the foot bridge why is this our (the car drivers) problem?

_________________
My Other car is a FH12 Globetrotter!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 16, 2005 11:36 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
Think about it from the council's point of view. Pedestrians are dying despite the provision of a foot bridge. Because of 'human behaviour' the footbridge may be seen as the wrong safety solution.

I don't much disagree with their point of view. Good road safety policies recognise real human behaviours and work with them to create a safer environment. It'd be nice if pedestrians behaved perfectly, but they don't and never will.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 16, 2005 12:00 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
In practice, pedestrians are often very reluctant to use footbridges. A further problem with footbridges is that they're not accessible to wheelchair users (while subways tend to become meeting places for undesirables).

There must be hundreds of impressive 1970s footbridges all over the country that are rarely if ever used now. There's a good example at the A34/A5145 junction at Parrswood, Manchester.

Taking pedestrians away from level ground doesn't work in practice. Either you have at-grade signalised crossings, or if segregation really is needed you put the road on a flyover or in a tunnel.

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 16, 2005 17:33 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member

Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 15:49
Posts: 393
Indeed. My walk to work takes me along a route with a subway under the main road, however using it adds about 10 minutes onto my journey time because it takes ages to walk all the way round to the ramp then down the ramp and up the ramp at the other end. I prefer to take my chances crossing the road instead, just because it's so much quicker.

If I end up getting killed it'll be my own fault though, and I'm certainly not campaigning for a pelican crossing to be installed.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 16, 2005 20:46 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 16:24
Posts: 322
Money!!! Money money money!

Once footbridges (and other bridges) reach a certain age they need parapet repairs and strengthening works to keep them in a safe and working order.

In Southampton a footbridge over the A3024 Bursledon Road was replaced with an at-grade crossing last month, as replacing the life-expired footbridge with another footbride was seen as not being economically viable, and those words came from the council.

Of course, the road must have been so much quieter in the early 1970s when the M27 motorway didn't exist and when traffic wasn't advised to travel all the way around Southampton and along the Western Approach to reach the city centre.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 17, 2005 03:52 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 17:10
Posts: 23
Location: Bristol
SafeSpeed wrote:
Think about it from the council's point of view. Pedestrians are dying despite the provision of a foot bridge. Because of 'human behaviour' the footbridge may be seen as the wrong safety solution.

I don't much disagree with their point of view. Good road safety policies recognise real human behaviours and work with them to create a safer environment. It'd be nice if pedestrians behaved perfectly, but they don't and never will.


I can see everybody's point here and i don't think im being narrow minded, but i travel along this route when im working (HGV) and it takes me home at about 3 or 4 in the morning, i object to the lights changing to red on my approach and then changing the pedestrian signal to green i suppose to let the invisible pedestrians cross and making me wait 2 - 3 minutes on red, and what do ya' know they've put a red light camera in, i can't think why?

_________________
My Other car is a FH12 Globetrotter!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 17, 2005 03:55 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 17:10
Posts: 23
Location: Bristol
I forgot to say that there are even barriers at the edge of the pavement and the central reserve, but these idiots are intent on jumping them, too bone idle to use the foot bridge which was accesible by wheel chairs as it went up in slight gradiants.

_________________
My Other car is a FH12 Globetrotter!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 17, 2005 04:06 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
14wheels wrote:
... at about 3 or 4 in the morning, i object to the lights changing to red on my approach and then changing the pedestrian signal to green i suppose to let the invisible pedestrians cross...


That's a different isue though isn't it? We now need to know why the lights are going to red when there are no pedestrians. Are they really?

14wheels wrote:
... and making me wait 2 - 3 minutes on red, and what do ya' know they've put a red light camera in, i can't think why?


Let's hope and pray the greed effect hasn't gone that far. If it has, that'd be the first case I've come across.

Anyone know what Police force area we're talking about?

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 17, 2005 04:48 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 17:10
Posts: 23
Location: Bristol
SafeSpeed wrote:

That's a different isue though isn't it? We now need to know why the lights are going to red when there are no pedestrians. Are they really?

Anyone know what Police force area we're talking about?


Yes really pretty much all of the lights in south gloucestershire now do this, we even have full time signals on roundabouts! if i want to exit at the 3rd exit of a roundabout on the A4174 i would have to stop at 3 sets of red lights at 3am, I am not joking!

South glos comes under avon & somerset

_________________
My Other car is a FH12 Globetrotter!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2005 01:52 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2004 11:05
Posts: 1044
Location: Hillingdon
SafeSpeed wrote:
We now need to know why the lights are going to red when there are no pedestrians. Are they really?


Slough (Thames Valley Police) has at least one set of pelican lights which does this as well.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2005 15:46 
Offline
New User
New User

Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2005 15:16
Posts: 2
In Peterborough there is a set of lights that are speed sensitive - approach them below the speed limit and they stay green, speed on approaching them and they go red!

They control a bus lane crossing a main road.

There is a further set about a mile down the road that go red for no reason and do not go green until you reach the stop line. If there is no traffic they seem to stay green all the time!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2005 19:22 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 21:27
Posts: 247
Location: Near Stockport
PeterE wrote:
There must be hundreds of impressive 1970s footbridges all over the country that are rarely if ever used now. There's a good example at the A34/A5145 junction at Parrswood, Manchester.


There's an even better example on the A34 Wilmslow-Handforth bypass. It's just south of the main entrance to Handforth Dean shopping centre. There are some obscure public footpaths to the east of here, going through what was once an MOD site but is now just a boggy wasteland. Nobody goes there apart from a few people fishing in the ponds they created as a sop to environmentalists. So why waste money building this bridge which hardly anybody has ever used? (And this one was built in 1994).

Brian


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2005 19:31 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 21:27
Posts: 247
Location: Near Stockport
rallyman72 wrote:
In Peterborough there is a set of lights that are speed sensitive - approach them below the speed limit and they stay green, speed on approaching them and they go red!


You find that on the Iberian Peninsular as well. When I was in the Costa Brava this light always went red just as I approached it. At first I thought it was just an odd coincidence.

I think this is a better approach than speed cameras. In fact they could replace speed cameras with speed-sensitive lights which also have traffic light cameras installed. That would certainly deter speeding! But of course they wouldn't get the revenue then would they? :thumbsdown:

Brian


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 20, 2005 06:07 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 17:10
Posts: 23
Location: Bristol
nedsram wrote:
rallyman72 wrote:
In Peterborough there is a set of lights that are speed sensitive - approach them below the speed limit and they stay green, speed on approaching them and they go red!


You find that on the Iberian Peninsular as well. When I was in the Costa Brava this light always went red just as I approached it. At first I thought it was just an odd coincidence.

I think this is a better approach than speed cameras. In fact they could replace speed cameras with speed-sensitive lights which also have traffic light cameras installed. That would certainly deter speeding! But of course they wouldn't get the revenue then would they? :thumbsdown:

Brian


They might seem like a good idea, however the way i see it, is that once local people suss out the lights which do this they be tempted to step on the gas when approaching an amber (that'll be £60 +3points Pls), rather than wait 3-4 minutes for invisible people to cross. Im sure i speak for most when I say that i drive more carefully when out of my home town!

_________________
My Other car is a FH12 Globetrotter!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.018s | 10 Queries | GZIP : Off ]