Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Mon May 04, 2026 21:19

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Oct 06, 2010 02:49 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 02:17
Posts: 7357
Location: Highlands
The Newspaper Here
The Newspaper wrote:
UK Accident Drop Mirrors US Performance
24/09/2010
United States matches accident drop in the United Kingdom without using speed cameras.

Hospital vs. Police accident stats (graph)
The UK Department for Transport (DfT) yesterday released statistics that show, like the US, road casualties are falling in Great Britain. DfT officials traditionally use the good news in the nationwide accident numbers to suggest that the use of speed cameras can take credit for the benefits. In this case, the English results showed a 12 percent drop in fatalities and a 4 percent drop in injury accidents from 2008 to 2009. This is nearly identical to the 10 percent drop in fatalities in the US -- which has no speed cameras -- and a 5.5 percent drop in injuries.

When expressed more precisely in terms of the accident rate -- the number of collisions per 100 million vehicle mile traveled -- the US saw a 5 percent drop in all types of crashes whereas Britain saw a 3 percent drop. More detailed examination of the US statistics showed the accident rate was closely related to the unemployment rate on a national and regional basis (read more). DfT's has attributed large casualty reductions directly to the presence of speed cameras.

"The introduction of this caused 69 percent fewer road deaths, 27 percent fewer road accidents and 65 percent fewer speed-related accidents," a DfT summary of the benefits of cameras in West London stated.

The Reported Road Casualties Great Britain 2009 calls into question this figure, as only 5 percent of accidents involved someone exceeding the posted speed limit -- this is the only type of bad driving that can be detected by photo radar units. This statistic is frequently conflated with "traveling too fast for the conditions" which includes crashes, for example on fresh ice where a driver may have been well below the posted limit. The expanded definition accounts for up to 27 percent of fatalities.

"Failed to look properly was again the most frequently reported contributory factor and was reported in 38 per cent of all accidents reported to the police in 2009," the report explained. "Four of the five most frequently reported contributory factors involved driver or rider error or reaction. For fatal accidents the most frequently reported contributory factor was loss of control, which was involved in 36 per cent of fatal accidents."

Traffic calming, including speed bumps and chicanes, caused a total of 196 collisions and 38 serious injury accidents. Transport Secretary Philip Hammond pledged during the election to end the war on the motorist. So far, he has carried out the pledge by withholding central funding for speed camera deployment.
The error many people seem to make is that 'speeding' is more than only a contributory factor in accidents. They seem to believe that if someone was not speeding then the accident would not be so 'bad' but this ignores the main fact that had the attention and observation been correct in the first place then the original error would not have happened and they would by choice have altered their speed to suit the conditions, thus a contributory factor than root cause.

_________________
Safe Speed for Intelligent Road Safety through proper research, experience & guidance.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 19, 2010 15:58 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2004 18:42
Posts: 1283
Location: Essex
SafeSpeedv2 wrote:
The error many people seem to make is that 'speeding' is more than only a contributory factor in accidents. They seem to believe that if someone was not speeding then the accident would not be so 'bad' but this ignores the main fact that had the attention and observation been correct in the first place then the original error would not have happened and they would by choice have altered their speed to suit the conditions, thus a contributory factor than root cause.
hat are

That's what happend when you get 'accident investigations' that are geared up to ascertain guilt and prosecute rather than focus on accident causation and prevention.

_________________
Gordon Brown saying I got the country into it's current economic mess so I'll get us out of it is the same as Bomber Harris nipping over to Dresden and offering to repair a few windows.

Chaos, panic and disorder - my work here is done.

http://www.wildcrafts.co.uk


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 225 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.075s | 11 Queries | GZIP : Off ]