adam.L wrote:
Mole, probably, when this last came up I weighed my full sized spare (steel wheel), jack and wheel brace on our fancy electronic scales at work. It came to 15kg. Exactly how much fuel/CO2 can I expect to save by jettisoning this? Keep in mind that I only weigh 9 stone.
How much fuel would be used recovering the car and carting it home, then carting it to a tyre fitter when they are open?
...and I think the last time it came up, I admitted that it would be stuff-all, in practical terms! HOWEVER, consider the situation from the car manufacturer's point of view. He gets to save 15kg (plus the weight of the larger spare wheel pressing, less the weight of the space saver) - let's say 5+kg. Saving 5kg elsewhere on the car would be likely to cost a 6 or even 7 figure sum to get into production. Let's also, for the time being, forget about the fact that it also solves, very neatly for him, the problem of directional tyres and different sizes front to rear. Now let's imagine that the weight saving has a MINISCULE effect on its official CO2 and fuel consumption figures. Let's suppose, as a best case, that it makes the difference between 226g/km of CO2 and 225g/km. That's a pretty impressive saving in road tax for UK-registsed cars. It will make a difference to sales on the forecourt!
Now let's consider the EC's New Car CO2 Regulation. Over the next few years, it obliges all manufacturers to cut their average CO2 emissions across their product ranges by x%. There are serious fines for each g/km of CO2 over the limit you are. A hundred Euros PER CAR could be on the cards. Multiply that by several hundred thousand cars a year and you're talking serious moolah!
Now when you add to that, the cost saving of the full-sized wheel and tyre in the first place, it all becomes a bit of a "no-brainer" from the manufacturer's point of view!
Yes, he might loose the odd sale to people who won't buy a car without a full-sized spare, but on balance, there just aren't enough of them to make it a problem - especially compared to the extra sales he'll get for being the in the next tax bracket down! If he can get it an insurance group lower because it's a bit stronger at the back - even better! In the next few years, I can see them dumping the spare altogether (and the jack, wheelbrace etc) and fitting run-flat tyres or those cans of foam. Bigger weight saving, bigger cost-saving, AND they won't get sued by Muppets who can't use a jack without hurting themselves!
As for the fuel used to cart it about - what do they care! It's not coming out of THEIR CO2 allowance!
adam.L wrote:
Society is obsessed with safety, our cars are loaded to the roof with passive safety guff to help protect the inept. Yet for the sake of a spare, that I could change in 10 minutes max, our shiney new car is quite capable of leaving us stranded on the hard shoulder while recovery turns up.
Until it hits them in the pocket, you may as well bark at the moon! My guess is that like me, you wouldn't be buying a new car anyway. People who buy new cars tend not to get their hands dirty and (I will be doing a FEW a dis-service here!) wouldn't know what to do with a jack and wheelbrace if their lives depended on it - especially if it's got fancy locking wheel nuts as well! What I'm trying to say, is that the manufacturer won't give a monkey's *%&! what you and I think!