Flynn wrote:
I've heard something like a minimum of 100 hours mentioned before a youngster can take this new test. That is insane. What with lessons at an average of £21 pounds per hour? It is obvious that those proposals have been knocked up by some rich git who has no idea what it is like to have a limit to money. Also another stupid thing is, the want to make it so that you have to be 18 before you can get your full license? What!? All we hear about is the crazy yob 17 year olds causing crashes and nothing about the hundreds of thousands who drive sensibly. One year won't make the slightest piece of difference the bad drivers will stay the same. I hope the rediculous proposals fall at the first hurdle. Although I do like the idea of the government taking up a stance towards education rather than the obsession over the speed limits.
It's
all about getting drivers off the road isn't it? Just like the cash cameras, not spending on the roads, parking fee's and restrictions, reduced speed limits, insurance hikes, VED hikes, Fuel tax esculator, restrictions on engine size in "congestion zones", Greeny crap about Co2....Make the Driving test harder!...and then harder again, the list is endless.....
Do you think that they're trying to tell us something?.......Well, if they ever succeed I tell you, that'll be the day that the "UK closed" sign will go up! ..and they're well on the way to that IMO because "public transport" does NOT exist here in the UK! Private transport for the public does(at a price)..... though I shudder to think about the conditions on it.....or the price!
At the moment.......it's cheaper to take my wife to work in a 4ltr V8 rather than for her to take the 2 miles by bus (and 6 times quicker).........and every time Gordon raises tax on the motorist........They put their fares up to match....
There's something wrong somewhere!.............and it isn't the cost of my V8