Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Tue Feb 03, 2026 08:21

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2007 11:31 
Offline
Former Police Officer
Former Police Officer
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 00:27
Posts: 351
Quote:
An online newspaper

Kansas: Big Rigs Equipped with Ticket Cameras
Federal gas tax money used to hide Kansas state troopers in big rig trucks so they can issue tickets to motorists.


Yellow Transportation big rigThe Kansas Highway Patrol last week began spying on motorists from privately owned big rig trucks. As part of a new, federally funded effort, a state trooper sits in the passenger seat of each truck and operates a set of five video cameras and a radar gun to identify motorists to ticket. The trooper will then contact a patrol car hidden nearby to issue the citation. The program is expected to generate hundreds of thousands of dollars in ticket revenue over the next six weeks.

"I want to thank industry and governmental partners that have agreed to work with the Patrol on this important program," Kansas Highway Patrol Superintendent William R. Seck said in a statement.

Yellow Transportation, a Wichita company, provided trucks for the most recent operation at no cost to the state. The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, which is funding the Kansas ticketing program, this month rewarded the cooperative company with its "highest safety rating" -- a valuable endorsement of Yellow's practices. In 2005, the federal agency similarly spent $600,000 in federal gas tax money to fund a ticketing program in Washington state.

_________________
Former Military Police Officer and accident investigator


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2007 12:27 
Offline
User

Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 21:19
Posts: 1059
How corrupt can you get? At least they're honest about it though!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2007 15:16 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 01:51
Posts: 329
Doesn't actually say what they're gonna enforce though :S


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2007 15:35 
Offline
User

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 12:33
Posts: 770
Location: Earith, Cambs
The 'totting' of points is nowhere so severe in the States.
Taking someone's licence is regarded as a 'last resort' and my buddy who was stopped for cruising his Subie WRX at 105 mph across Arizona only got a fixed fine.
The Yanks have learned to live with the car, not declare war on drivers, as has happened here.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2007 20:27 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 20:40
Posts: 38
Cooperman wrote:
The 'totting' of points is nowhere so severe in the States.
Taking someone's licence is regarded as a 'last resort' and my buddy who was stopped for cruising his Subie WRX at 105 mph across Arizona only got a fixed fine.
The Yanks have learned to live with the car, not declare war on drivers, as has happened here.


There really has been no declaration of war on drivers. In fact, it's motorists that get to break laws regularly. And anyway, using a mobile phone whilst driving? A £60 fine and three points... Big deal.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2007 21:42 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 14:26
Posts: 4364
Location: Hampshire/Wiltshire Border
jr135 wrote:
There really has been no declaration of war on drivers.

I was going to reply to this but in the end I just laughed.

_________________
Malcolm W.
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not represent the views of Safespeed.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2007 22:49 
Offline
User

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 15:52
Posts: 461
malcolmw wrote:
jr135 wrote:
There really has been no declaration of war on drivers.

I was going to reply to this but in the end I just laughed.


Youre ok, i just wet myself. :)

_________________
"Safety" Scamera Partnerships;
Profitting from death and misery since 1993.

Believe nothing- Question everything.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2007 22:51 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 20:40
Posts: 38
malcolmw wrote:
jr135 wrote:
There really has been no declaration of war on drivers.

I was going to reply to this but in the end I just laughed.


:) Er, ok, I'm glad you can see how ridiculous it is!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2007 23:12 
Offline
User

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 12:33
Posts: 770
Location: Earith, Cambs
No declaration of war on drivers? Don't make me laugh.
An elderly guy parks a £30k classic car, quite legally, and it gets towed away and crushed - he gets an apology.
You drive a few miles an hour over a speed limit 4 times in 3 years, with no danger to anyone, and yet you stand to lose your licence, your job, your career, your living and, maybe, your marriage.
You are taxed, taxed and taxed again for the dubious privilege of driving to work and back and for going about your personal business.
We are threatened with vehicle tracking in order to make us use non-existant public transport, whilst in reality this is just a proposed means of raising more tax and, at the same time, controlling all our movements.
Speed limits are constantly being reduced downwards whilst it is now well known that breaking the speed limit accounts for c.5% of all accidents.
More & more cameras are being installed to monitor all our actions as drivers.
And you claim that this is not a war on drivers. Which planet are you from, 'cause clearly you don't come from the same world as the rest of us.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 18, 2007 01:14 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 20:40
Posts: 38
Firstly, what happened to this guy's classic car is outrageous and an apology obviously isn't good enough. However, this kind of thing is extremely rare, and probably just down to some idiot in this case.

As for driving a few miles an hour over a speed limit, to talk about a war on motorists we've also got to look at the reality here. Where I drive, in Greater London and Surrey, the chances of the police pulling you over for doing a few miles over the limit is practically zero. Even if it's higher elsewhere, you've still got to look at the tiny numbers of traffic police there are. And if you do get caught once or twice, and you stand to lose your job, your career, your living and, maybe, your marriage, then you really need to just adhere to the law. And let's be honest here, in reality we're not literally talking about "a few" miles an hour over the limit.

Tax: we are heavily taxed in all areas, so let's not pretend that that somehow adds up to a war on motorists.

I really don't think that vehicle tracking is about controlling all our movements, but, like you, I am against it.

You mention that "More & more cameras are being installed to monitor all our actions as drivers", well, more and more cameras are installed everywhere else as well. There was a story in The Sunday Times just this week about CCTV drones (!) being used to monitor people. Would you therefore say that that was part of a "War Against People"?

You say: "Speed limits are constantly being reduced downwards whilst it is now well known that breaking the speed limit accounts for c.5% of all accidents."

That is heavily disputed. Anyway, the problem here is that, if you want drivers to drive at no more than 30, then it's no good having the speed limit set at 30 because the law allows a 10% margin of error plus the police normally give at least 2mph on top of that, and even then they normally concentrate on the worse offenders, so those doing at least 40. So if you want the actual speed of vehicles to be no more than 30 then the speed limit has to be 20. It's unfortunate really.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 18, 2007 07:54 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 14:26
Posts: 4364
Location: Hampshire/Wiltshire Border
Quote:
You mention that "More & more cameras are being installed to monitor all our actions as drivers", well, more and more cameras are installed everywhere else as well. There was a story in The Sunday Times just this week about CCTV drones (!) being used to monitor people. Would you therefore say that that was part of a "War Against People"?

I thought I would never agree with Peter Hain but the expression "War Against .... whatever" is counter productive.

The Government are progressively ratcheting up their control over the populace under various pretexts, principally the environment and terrorism. The CCTV numbers and the suggestion of road pricing are just two examples of this. So, the oppresssion of motorists is just a subset of their overall objective.

I never used to be very concerned about civil liberties but this Government have made me see the danger in not defending ourselves against jackboot legislation. The latest example? We want the power to lock you up in a mental asylum if we think you "may" be a danger in the future. No evidence, just the opinion of a Government employed doctor. Nice.

_________________
Malcolm W.
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not represent the views of Safespeed.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 18, 2007 09:56 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2004 11:05
Posts: 1044
Location: Hillingdon
jr135 wrote:
Firstly, what happened to this guy's classic car is outrageous and an apology obviously isn't good enough. However, this kind of thing is extremely rare, and probably just down to some idiot in this case.


The particular outcome of this case may be rare, but look at the wider picture of genuinely innocent motorists being incorrectly penalised in some way and having to expend no small amount of time, energy and money to battle the bureaucrats to clear themselves.

It took me several months to get a simple parking ticket dropped-I was in a position to be able to easily revisit the area a few times to gather the evidence I heeded to prove my innocence, but what if the ticket had been issued whilst I was on holiday on the other side of the country? Even if I were as sure of my innocence, I might just have paid up on the grounds that it was less expensive than another round-trip to the area...


Quote:
Where I drive, in Greater London and Surrey, the chances of the police pulling you over for doing a few miles over the limit is practically zero.


Who's talking about getting a pull from a real live trafpol? Most of us here would prefer this to the reality of finding a brown envelope sitting on the doormat one morning, accusing you of speeding at some point in the past 2 weeks (assuming the SCP is following protocol and not just dishing out NIPs willy-nilly regardless of time limits...) at a location you might not recognise from the somewhat vague description, and asking you, if you'd be so kind, to admit your guilt without seeing any actual evidence, on the grounds that it'll be less painful for your wallet to just pay up now rather than try and defend yourself once it goes to court.


Quote:
And if you do get caught once or twice, and you stand to lose your job, your career, your living and, maybe, your marriage, then you really need to just adhere to the law.


I'd be more inclined to accept that argument if people were only at risk if they were behaving in a manner inconsistent with the majority of road users, but when someone could potentially rack up enough points to lose their licence before the first NIP has even arrived, for driving at speeds which are entirely consistent with the motorists they were sharing the roads with at the time, then it becomes far less agreeable. Especially when, at the same time people are being pinged for simply making good progress and keeping up with the flow, the cameras are ignoring the people who really do need a slap on the wrist.

Quote:
And let's be honest here, in reality we're not literally talking about "a few" miles an hour over the limit.


Depends on your definition of "few".

Quote:
Tax: we are heavily taxed in all areas, so let's not pretend that that somehow adds up to a war on motorists.


Which other areas of everyday life see us being taxed as heavily? I might grimace a bit each month when I see how much of my pay packet has been snaffled away by G.Brown Esq., but as a proportion of the total it pales into insignificance compared to what he grabs from my pocket every time I visit the petrol station.



Quote:
You mention that "More & more cameras are being installed to monitor all our actions as drivers", well, more and more cameras are installed everywhere else as well.


Imagine that it was illegal to walk on the cracks in the pavement, would you be happy to get fined if one of those CCTV cameras saw you doing it, even inadvertantly (perhaps someone pushed you, or you lost your balance in high winds/icy conditions)?

_________________
Chris


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 18, 2007 18:13 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 00:45
Posts: 1016
Location: Mighty Tamworth
Twister wrote:
.......revisit the area a few times to gather the evidence I needed to prove my innocence,


Quoted cos I thought it a key point

_________________
Oct 11 Birmingham Half Marathon. I am running for the British Heart Foundation.
http://www.justgiving.com/Rob-Taylor


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.050s | 11 Queries | GZIP : Off ]