Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Mon Apr 27, 2026 10:43

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 11:01 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2006 11:54
Posts: 13
Location: Aylesbury, UK
The first part of my drive to work is on a B-road. Not too busy, undulating and with several bends. I always take a fairly relaxed approach (why stress to arrive at work 5 minutes earlier?). I guess my speed varies from about 30 to 50 mph, driving according to the hazards I see.
Over the weekend, the road has been littered with speed restriction signs. Variously 30 or 40 mph with no relation to the hazards. It is impossible to comply without either a) engaging first gear and staying in it or b) looking at the speedometer the whole time.
So what was a fairly pleasurable experience is now a nightmare.
I expect the speed cameras will go up next week.
One immediate consequence of the new regime is poorer fuel economy.
I guess my natural driving style is fairly fuel-efficient as I lift off the accelerator when I see a hazard, allowing speed to reduce with a minimum of braking. But the chop/change speed limits require much more braking and much more work in low gear.
So "Speed cameras damage the environment".
Repeat ad nauseum every time you hear someone say "Speed Kills"


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 11:49 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 15:05
Posts: 1225
Location: Glasgow
Unfortunately, they have already tried to head that one off by claiming that slower speeds cut emissions...


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 11:51 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 00:04
Posts: 2311
mark-w-jones wrote:
It is impossible to comply without either a) engaging first gear and staying in it

you drive at 40mph in 1st gear??? Wow!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 18:12 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 02:50
Posts: 2868
Location: Dorset
johnsher wrote:
mark-w-jones wrote:
It is impossible to comply without either a) engaging first gear and staying in it

you drive at 40mph in 1st gear??? Wow!

Only on residential roads with humps on, surely? :twisted:

Those signs aren't cheap. They obviously use energy to produce, transport, install and maintain (ha!). And they do make the place look ugly. And as it is already illegal to drive faster than is safe they aren't really needed.

_________________
Andrew.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 19:30 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
johnsher wrote:
mark-w-jones wrote:
It is impossible to comply without either a) engaging first gear and staying in it

you drive at 40mph in 1st gear??? Wow!


I get 60+ in first on the bike.... :wink:

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 20:53 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 21:10
Posts: 1693
johnsher wrote:
mark-w-jones wrote:
It is impossible to comply without either a) engaging first gear and staying in it

you drive at 40mph in 1st gear??? Wow!


XJ12C! 60 in first! 100 in second! (and we wont talk about what happens next :lol: )

Under full chat 1/2 gear change was a bit like the scene in Apollo 13 where they depicted S1/S2 separation. :D

There are plently of high performance cars out there that would leave the old Jag for dust, but somehow they are mostly rather too refined and dont Ooze the shear raw power that the old XJ12's did. (My Brother had an XJRS6.0 it was AWESOME untill the inevitable happened :( )

I do miss her! :cry:

_________________
"The road to a police state is paved with public safety legislation"


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 21:20 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 00:01
Posts: 2258
Location: South Wales
r11co wrote:
Unfortunately, they have already tried to head that one off by claiming that slower speeds cut emissions...


Really? I thought that the most efficient speed was generally around 55-60mph?

Obviously it varies from car to car. My Legacy seems to be most efficient at 80, presumably because that's top gear just before the changeover point for the secondary turbo, meaning the primary is running at the limits of it's effectiveness.

Still only 30mpg though :twisted:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 03:05 
Offline
Pending Verification

Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 02:26
Posts: 4
My 2.2 Omega seems best around 75. 36-38 mpg. Not that I would drive around the town centre at that speed. My 1.6 Escort seems to do best at about 55-60, gets 52mpg compared with about 38mpg at most other speeds above and below.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.028s | 10 Queries | GZIP : Off ]