Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Mon May 04, 2026 12:45

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 09:44 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2005 08:22
Posts: 2618
Link

Quote:
Digital tachographs over-record time driven by lorry drivers, says the Road Haulage Association.
“The new digital tachographs are fundamentally flawed and unreliable. We have demonstrated that, under a range of circumstances, they will show that the driver spent more time driving than was actually the case because they have ‘rounded up’ part-minutes to full minutes," says RHA chief executive Roger King. "Hauliers are losing productivity as a result."
“We need urgent clarification of what is VOSA’s approach on enforcement, and I have written to VOSA chief executive Stephen Tetlow.
“In the meantime, we are advising operators that they should be aware that trucks fitted with digital tachographs are liable to record an inflated driving time and that the attitude of law enforcers is uncertain.”
The RHA carried out a study, in conjunction with Volvo Trucks, that involved two trucks doing identical work, back to back. The vehicle fitted with the digital tachograph recorded significantly more driving time than that of the analogue tachograph. The issue is particularly clear in operations such as multi-drop.
Full results of the study will be published in Roadway magazine’s April issue.
King revealed the finding at an IRU meeting in Brussels last Thursday. Strong concern was shown by delegates, including Denmark, where a survey done with hauliers produced similar results, and from France, which has requested that operators be given the option to have analogue tachographs in new trucks, until such time as this issue is resolved.

_________________
Science won over religion when they started installing lightning rods on churches.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 18, 2007 21:09 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2005 12:52
Posts: 947
Location: falkirk
there is a shock. they tried to rush it but as only one manufacturer would have been tested, they delayed it but not by enough. i got my card through yesterday and although i am legally obliged to carry it, i wont use it until i absolutely have to. more trouble than they are worth.
more accurate at detecting but less accurate at recording. what the hell is that all about? :x

_________________
Richie

SSAFA supporter
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=126025031585


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 00:03 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
scanny77 wrote:
more accurate at detecting but less accurate at recording. what the hell is that all about? :x


Nu Labia to a teeeeeee (perhaps):roll:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 71 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.037s | 13 Queries | GZIP : Off ]