Sorry for the long post...
Kenny1975 wrote:
No i think you have got it all wrong. Like a lot of new bikers do.
They assume the ability to go fast, the ability to get your knee down on a corner means you are a good driver and experienced. In part i think its a macho thing.
To be fair my self-evaluation was never based upon "being fast", rather on factors like following proper cornering technique (look through, accelerating around the bend to weight the rear, don't touch the brakes etc.) and never target fixating/panic braking, commuting across London for a number of months in good time with no major incidents, not relying on using the brakes to alter speed and so on. I was never an insane speedfreak (part of what has made the whole experience so frustrating, but also revealing).
The knee down "heroics" came 10,000 miles later with the overconfidence it brought, and an addiction to the feel and sound of titanium on tarmac that I discovered with my new Alpinestars suit. Think I'll stick to empty roundabouts in future.

What I meant was that - and I may be wrong, but I still believe it to be true - I picked up an unusually varied skillset and developed it to an unusually high level for only having five months' worth of riding experience (people have commented on more than one occassion that they assumed I'd been riding for years), but I didn't gain the experience/discretion to be able to judge accurately enough when
not to use certain skills. Cue making the idiotic mistake of treating an October road like it was June.

Quote:
Having an accident can be the best thing for some bikers, it gives them respect for the road conditions and what the bike can do, it also gives them a wake up call that motorbikes can be dangerous.
I think your problem is you thought you had it sussed and this has completly thrown you, believe me it prob aint a bad thing, ive been in similar situation about 10 years ago where i was forced to examine the way i rode.
I have to agree (although if this was about teaching me a lesson, I wish I'd broken something that didn't take so bloody long to heal...).
What this has taught me is to look at safety margins in a whole new light - you'll get away with it nine times out of ten, or maybe even 99 times out of 100, but when riding is a lifestyle and not an occassional interest, those odds are actually terrible. And it only has to go wrong once to be catastrophic. That was my one and only crash, and I got injured far more severely than any of my friends have in their time, most of them much more reckless and having had multiple serious accidents over the years. Unforgiving game...
adam.L wrote:
repiV,
when you are mended and have saved up for your insurance (that is gonna hurt), have you considered the fun to be had at low speed?
I wouldn't go for a slower bike, although my absolute favourite roads are those tight, twisty B-roads in Essex with the 15mph hairpins around Saffron Walden/Finchingfield etc. Brilliant fun, although they can be extremely deceptive at times. I much prefer the slower corners - you try to get those kind of lean angles on a "120mph sweeper" and you're playing in Darwin's league.
I do a lot of long distance riding - stay with a friend of mine in Exeter quite often in particular - so something with a bit of oomph and a half-fairing is pretty much essential. I wanted to replace the bike with a Fazer Thou instead for this very reason, but the insurance really is insane. The 600 would probably be more useful and fun for town and twisties anyway.
Never understood the sportsbike craze though. I've ridden several and didn't get on with any of them - the R6 is pretty entertaining and has razor-sharp steering, but after half an hour I want to get off. Too uncomfortable. Plus, downright
awful in traffic - not to mention they're slow unless you rev the shit out of them. Don't see the point in the things. I reckon most people would get far more out of a performance-oriented streetbike.
Quote:
I did my direct access in 2000 and had ideas about a Fazer/CBR600/SV650 etc, but finacial constraints and being generally tight stopped me. In 2002 I bought a C90 for £300, I use it every day and have had many laughs on it. I have fallen off it once, but that was due to taking it off road to check my irrigator. It doesn't like being an R1200GS...
We have to use our bikes in the environment for which they were designed and heavey traffic in town is where mine comes into it's own. I have (just) kept up with a GSXR750 in town, he couldn't beat the lights even with a big power advantage. Resent urban vitctims have been a V-Rod and a 1250 Bandit, they were too wide Laughing .
Yeah, you've just brought back memories of this scooter bastard who was never out of my mirrors for long on the way home from work one night. Traffic wasn't even that heavy. I was impressed.

I like the Fazer because it does everything well. It could use slightly more kick and top end, and it's probably lacking in ground clearance for trackdays but other than that I can't really fault it.
Quote:
Cruising around minor roads in the summer is great fun at 40mph. You can almost hear the birds singing and smell the flowers, there's no need to rush. But if you really must have an adrenalin rush, there is no greater than taking a C90 on NSL dual carriageway :Shocked: :Laughing: never again!
Hmm.

I have to admit, the most fun I've had on a bike was the couple of weeks I spent on a 125 preparing for my DAS. But I don't think that has anything to do with the low power of the bike, it's just that it was a novel and amazing new experience. Especially having been reliant on public transport before, I got to see all these new and interesting places outside of London that were suddenly only half an hour away. It was utterly brilliant in every way.
Quote:
They are a very good way of building up noclaims too. Mine has cheaply got me 5 yrs protected NCB and I have checked and can get a 900 Hornet insured fully comp for less than £120.
Very cheap.

My TPFT insurance was £450, which I thought was pretty damn good, but they wanted £2600 for fully comp. I now understand why.

Although this year I've been quoted half that (not that it matters yet anyway).
Quote:
I can't read the road conditions like a copper, but having cartoon suspension, no grip and a only nod in the direction of brakes makes me very aware of what is going on under my skinny tyres.
Aye. I always thought the guys who ride scooters in winter are a bit crazy myself!
ancient_william wrote:
RepiV
Sorry to hear about your accident, and hope that you will soon be back on two wheels.
Thanks.
Quote:
The fact that you have posted this message is a good thing, it means that you are thinking about the reasons for the accident and looking for answers. As JT has pointed out, we should all learn from the mistakes we make, it is what allows us to get older and wiser!
Reading your post, I was struck by the phase that you had made a few runs and built up to the speed, before the final time, when it lost the rear and then the front.
Regardless of the road conditions, leaves, etc, just think about the forces that you are exerting on your bike/tyres. You have gone from a stable upright position to one of severe lean angle, with minimal time for the bike to adjust, therefore upsetting the balance completely, causing the bike to effectively skid, as the tyres lost traction.
So progressively applying steering input is safer than knocking the bike right over into the desired lean angle straight away?
Quote:
For a full discription of skidding, Roadcraft has a full definiton and pictures to explain it. It also explains that to get out of a skid you should steer into it. and this is what racers do when sliding the rear tyre. So you might want to think about your cornering style, counter steering, etc.
I'll definitely check out the book, thanks.
My cornering style generally goes something like this:
- I ease off to the desired corner speed well in advance, generally using engine braking - I'm not into heavy braking or (sounds like a moronic idea to me -) trail braking.
- I
usually stay in the saddle, it's less effort and I get more lean angle therefore more fun. If I am in the mood for hanging off, I also get this done in advance and "lock" the position against the bike, still with arms loose. In any case, inside toe goes up onto the peg to avoid boot scraping.
- I take a wide entry point, look right through to the exit and generally say to myself when I'm going to turn in, then push on the bar until the desired lean angle is attained (quickly, but not aggressively) and as soon as the bike's over I start very gently rolling on the throttle (for grip, not speed).
- Then pick the bike up and on my way. I don't usually nail it out of a corner as I don't see the point, but if I do accelerate out of a bend, I wait until the bike's upright.
Quote:
However, if I might make an observation, the obsession with getting your knee down is fueled by the biking press and does not make you ride any quicker (unless on a race track where you can apex each corner) and as noted by someone else, a good Police / Advanced rider would beat you along your favourite road.
The reason for this is simple, while you both would be riding at the same speed along the straight, he would be braking earlier, setting the bike up for the corner and accelerating earlier to drive through it, while you would have gained a few feet in the braking area, but are now hanging off the bike and unable to open the throttle as you hang on to the bike in the bend!!
For anyone who doubts this theory, try this with a friend on a dual carriageway with no traffic about - one of you approach the empty roundabout and ride around it, following the curve of the island and exit on the third turning to make it a right turn. The other rider enters the roundabout and steers a wide line into the roundabout, to make it an oval (so you start at the righthand side of lane 2, crossing early and smoothly to the nearside lane, then a slightly sharper turn, so you are accelerating as you apex the island and forming a straight line to the nearside of the third exit). I think you will be surprised at the results - if I have explained it clearly - and please don't collect your mate as hou whizz past his nearside!
I don't doubt it.

I'm not that interested in outright speed really, I just love having the bike over sideways. It's a glorious feeling. As is that of slider against tarmac. Tend to enjoy left-handers more as they're generally a bit sharper.
Thus my dilemma!
Quote:
Hope some of this helps.
William
Most definitely. Thank you.
R1Nut wrote:
I would echo all of the above.
My first bikes were both under 250cc. One let go of its rear sprocket while in the outside lane of the A2. On the other I came round a nice right hand corner at approx 40 mph to find a brick lying on my line. I was lucky, the suspension handled it and I was only a couple of inches off line when I landed.
Christ, I would have been surprised to hear of a bike being able to go over a brick in a straight line, let alone in a bend.
I had a similar experience with a pothole at night - a similar speed to your brick case I would guess, just the curvature of an urban road. First I knew of it was when the back end stepped out massively, I was amazed when I didn't come off. I guess there's only one way to handle corners at night...slowly.
Quote:
Riding a big bike takes years of skill, although you don't say whether it was the 6 or thou. Some Fazers have a low exhaust and others have the under the seat exhausts. If you have an exhaust which is low it can come into contact with the road prior to the edge of the rear being reached. This will cause the rear to lose grip closely followed by the front which is now overloaded with forces.
It's the 6...'02 Foxeye model. Hate the new ones with the underseat exhausts, they're bloody awful. Snatchy fuelling, all the acceleration of an asthmatic weasel and it really feels like the computer is pondering over your throttle input and then badly translating it...like a Babelfish bike or something, whereas on the carbed bike it just does what you tell it to. Bleurgh.
I don't think I've ever experienced the exhaust scraping before - is there any reason it would have done so in that situation when it didn't at other times when the pegs were actually down?
Quote:
Your friend who rides every day all year undoubtedly knows more about his bike and how it handles than any other rider who goes out after passing his test and gets their knee down in a week.
No doubt. I think he chose the wrong bike though.
Never seen him lean it over 20 degrees...I'm working on converting him to the Fazer faithful. I wish there were more bikes like it, the other bikes in the class are either much slower, unfaired or both. I could definitely see myself on a Street Triple, if only it had a half-fairing.
Quote:
I've been riding bikes for about 15 years and have owned my R1 for 10 of those.
I have never gotten my knee down. I don't have to because then I have a margin for adjustments.
BTW, I have braked on diesel and it is as bad as ice. I've also had the front and the back of the bike step out because of black ice. Try to never have to stamp your foot down to lift the bike out of a slide. It hurts.
It's not an experience I look forward to. I've had plenty of rear wheel slides (usually at sub-25mph speeds and moderate lean angles, oddly enough) but they've always corrected themselves.