weepej wrote:
botach wrote:
Pray tell us ,why you are not [anti car]. Another question, I fear we'll not get an answer to . It'll slip away ( a la Michele of la resistance, like phantom of the night, or descend into the depths as his mate (Cap'n Pugwash does) ). Like so many of those unanswered Questions, that CPJ remembers that weepy has failed to remember, to answer.
Another question I've already answered before you asked it. I said above, I drive, I'm not anti car. No wonder you don't think I don't answer any questions, again, I seriously worry about your comprehension skills.
Can I ask you again, because you've not answered, where I wrote cyclists are 'those who can do no wrong' and that red lights and total disregard of road traffic laws, do NOT apply to cyclists?
Also remind me who's failing to answer questions here?
I could answer that, but once again, you are heading down the ad hominie road. You attempt to say I'm anti cyclist. I'm anti idiot, as in the bloke who thought it was a great idea the other day to make life difficult for drivers /make his life more dangerous in preventing overtakes on a straight clear bit of road, then decided to undertake a line of cars to go through a red light ,that had been on for a good few minutes ,and head into a possible line of traffic on a major route under improvement, an a stretch of road that was ,at that point single carriageway,and only wide enough for LARGE VANS.HGV, would have wiped him out, or caused a major incident avoiding him, with the driver having to spend weeks off work ,undergoing counselling. WHO pray tell pays for that. ANY insured driver would be covered with INSURANCE, but not Mr Idiot.
In today's society, with traffic regulation so reliant on robot enforcement, cyclists are regularly flouting traffic laws ( set up to ensure the safety of ALL road users), and placing other road users at danger. WHY- because they are invisible to robot enforcement, as the PCSO brought in to police cyclists are being drafted to do other duties. I'd ask WHY you are so anti registration /licencing/insuring of cyclists. Is it because YOU ( as your posts suggest) condone ignorance of traffic regulations by cyclists. You have NEVER spoken out against this activity, but shout about mal treatment of cyclists by motorists.