Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Sat May 18, 2024 11:06

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Dec 17, 2009 14:48 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 13:55
Posts: 2247
Location: middlish
http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/ ... ents-study

Quote:
A tiny proportion of accidents involving cyclists are caused by riders jumping red lights or stop signs, or failing to wear high-visibility clothing and use lights, a government-commissioned study has discovered.

The findings appear to contradict a spate of recent reports speculating that risky behaviour by riders, such as listening to music players while cycling, could be behind a near 20% rise in cyclist deaths and serious injuries in the second quarter of this year.

The study, carried out for the Department for Transport, found that in 2% of cases where cyclists were seriously injured in collisions with other road users police said that the rider disobeying a stop sign or traffic light was a likely contributing factor. Wearing dark clothing at night was seen as a potential cause in about 2.5% of cases, and failure to use lights was mentioned 2% of the time.

The figures were slightly higher when the cyclist was killed, but in such cases only the driver's account is available.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 17, 2009 15:42 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 14:26
Posts: 4364
Location: Hampshire/Wiltshire Border
The words to notice here are:

"a government-commissioned study"

You can immediately discount this work as lies and spin. You will note that there isn't a category for "stupidly riding up the inside of artics turning left".

_________________
Malcolm W.
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not represent the views of Safespeed.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 17, 2009 16:52 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 13:54
Posts: 1711
Location: NW Kent
From personal experience I would say the majority of my near misses or none misses when cycling have been down to poor drivers. Then of course I would say that wouldn't I? :)

The risky behaviour that has been picked amounts to 4.5% of accidents, the CTC thinks this is inconsequential and driving standards should be targeted.

This campaign uses the low percentage of accidents caused by breaking the speed limit as part of the argument that poor driving is what needs targeting not technical offences.

Funny how CTC and Safe Speed can agree isn't it?

_________________
Driving fast is for a particular time and place, I can do it I just only do it occasionally because I am a gentleman.
- James May


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 17, 2009 17:08 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 14:26
Posts: 4364
Location: Hampshire/Wiltshire Border
Excellent.

_________________
Malcolm W.
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not represent the views of Safespeed.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 17, 2009 20:27 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6735
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
toltec wrote:
From personal experience I would say the majority of my near misses or none misses when cycling have been down to poor drivers. Then of course I would say that wouldn't I? :)

In the same way as some motorcyclists say that the majority of motorcycle accidents are due to SMIDSYs by other road users. The report doesn't exclude the possibility that cycle accidents result from general mistakes and errors of judgment by cyclists as opposed to specific behaviours, although inevitably some will interpret it in that way.

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 17, 2009 21:03 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 13:54
Posts: 1711
Location: NW Kent
PeterE wrote:
toltec wrote:
From personal experience I would say the majority of my near misses or none misses when cycling have been down to poor drivers. Then of course I would say that wouldn't I? :)

In the same way as some motorcyclists say that the majority of motorcycle accidents are due to SMIDSYs by other road users. The report doesn't exclude the possibility that cycle accidents result from general mistakes and errors of judgment by cyclists as opposed to specific behaviours, although inevitably some will interpret it in that way.


The report does appear to have some balance to it, I was pointing out that my experience which leads me to agree with it is bound to have some observer bias.

_________________
Driving fast is for a particular time and place, I can do it I just only do it occasionally because I am a gentleman.
- James May


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 23:55 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9264
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
Strange the saying that we're always learning -and saw something today that falls into that category and into the risky cycling bit as well . Driving through town, there was a yoof on a bike -sort that looks too small for te rider -the sort that works it's way down the road ,then alternates between pavement and road to the lights ,and crosses using the pedestrian crossing .
But on the pavement -badly needing some attention ,with ice and frozen snow,his rear wheel slid ,causing the rear end of the bike to career toward the road . Call it instinct ,because that's all I can ,I came accross this one today - no problems , I was far enough away,and travelling at low speed .Had he slid into the road ,I'd have missed him ,because old lizard man had moved my right foot to the brake -JUST IN CASE .

But -it's a warning ,for all of us -4 wheel and two wheel - WE CAN ALL SKID -I used to love trying to find how to counter it on a racing style bike - and that's not much fun ,narrow tyres and icy pavements -it's good training for driving too.

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 24, 2009 10:56 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 21:17
Posts: 3734
Location: Dorset/Somerset border
Wasn't there a study recently that suggested that female cyclists were more risk-averse, and conversely this made them more prone to accidents?

This would tie in with this study, wouldn't it?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 24, 2009 11:14 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
Johnnytheboy wrote:
Wasn't there a study recently that suggested that female cyclists were more risk-averse, and conversely this made them more prone to accidents?

This would tie in with this study, wouldn't it?

Was this ("Are women cyclists in more danger than men?") what you're referring to?

_________________
Views expressed are personal opinions and are not necessarily shared by the Safe Speed campaign


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 24, 2009 17:11 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 21:17
Posts: 3734
Location: Dorset/Somerset border
Spot on. Once again let down by my utter laziness to back up my remembering of past threads.

:D


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 06, 2010 05:19 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 14:06
Posts: 3654
Location: Oxfordshire
Quote:
A tiny proportion of accidents involving cyclists are caused by riders jumping red lights or stop signs, or failing to wear high-visibility clothing and use lights, a government-commissioned study has discovered.

The findings appear to contradict a spate of recent reports speculating that risky behaviour by riders, such as listening to music players while cycling, could be behind a near 20% rise in cyclist deaths and serious injuries in the second quarter of this year


[Pedant mode]How exactly does this vindicate listening to music players whilst riding as safe!?[/Pedant mode]

_________________
Regulation without education merely creates more criminals.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 06, 2010 19:14 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9264
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
RobinXe wrote:


[Pedant mode]How exactly does this vindicate listening to music players whilst riding as safe!?[/Pedant mode]


Or the activity classed as downright dangerous in a car - using a mobile. Then again ,if those cyclists can't see, ignore or just don't know what a "NO cycling sign in pedestrian areas means ......................

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.013s | 10 Queries | GZIP : Off ]