ed_m wrote:
i'm amazed they accept it as being a design flaw/compromise given the potential to get sued!
That thought did cross my mind actually. I'm certain it could still be proved that I have a dangerous design problem affecting my particular bike, but I'm not 'that' sort of person. I think Specialized should take note however.
Big companies with a good reputation usually recall dangerous or defective things and I would certainly put that model in one of those two categories if it cannot consistently be made safe or if there is any doubt. If I had actually come off and hurt or even killed myself, the ramifications for them would be very bad indeed. I'm not exaggerating about the terror I felt, and I'm no wossy.
There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that if I, or anyone else of my stature, rode down the very same road at the same speed as I did, they would get exactly the same results - or worse! I don't think 31.3 mph is excessive by any means, as recorded on my clock. When I put road tyres on my 16 year old Stumpjumper, weighing in at 30lbs, I once got up to 45 mph down a hill without any problems.
Maybe if it's only about one in every ten then they should road test them somehow before sending them out on the public. I'm referring to Specialized the global company here. I say again, the place I purchased it from have been (are) great and I would recommend them to anyone.
I'm actually not bothered about saving every gram off the bike but I thought I would be getting better
and lighter, since I gather things have moved on a bit since my old Stumpjumper. I've never really seen the point in shaving every molecule off the bike when I've got a spare tyre around my waist. So it seems to me that in the bike war of boasting the lightest they have compromised on safety this time.
ed_m wrote:
PS there's a speccy store at the fort ?
Yep, that's where I got it from. Nice place, nice people
