Safe Speed Forums

quick legal point i need to clarify?

am i correct in the folowing:
in the eyes of the law an offence only exists when proved it was detected in compliance with rules, acpo guidelines etc?

if that the case why do they want you to say guilty or not guilty to something that may not have happened in the eyes of the law if they didnt follow rules, surely they should go over all the evidence cross examination first before asking whether you are guilty of something that in the eyes of the law may not have happen if rules were ignored!!

Read ACPO code of practice (not a guide line)
especialy the foreword

_________________
Speed limit sign radio interview. TV Snap Unhappy
“It has never been the rule in this country – I hope it never will be - that suspected criminal offences must automatically be the subject of prosecution” He added that there should be a prosecution: “wherever it appears that the offence or the circumstances of its commission is or are of such a character that a prosecution in respect thereof is required in the public interest”
This approach has been endorsed by Attorney General ever since 1951. CPS Code