doomdoomdoomdoom wrote:
Is this grounds for contesting the charge?
nope
Quote:
When we examined the 'evidence' online, it shows that I was shot at 245 metres but the equipment has been recently calibrated for distance checks at 25, 75 and 100 metres. In other words, I was shot at almost 3 times the distance for which the equipment had been calibrated.
put three dots in a line you get a straight line, check a laser at 25m, 75m ,100 m you will get three 0 mph return readings and whatever distance thereafter
Quote:
And is there any point fighting it, does anyone ever win, or is it just a waste of time and money?
there are plenty of people willing to take your money