SafeSpeed wrote:
Browsing the Downing Street web site I came across:
Quote:
http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/UKRoadSafety[...]
With a large number of elder drivers and drivers who have not passed a UK driving examination, it would be prudent to try to inform the public of some safety information and some ettiquete.
I find this petition fascinating in many ways. The idea is good but, strangely, the originator has failed to compile a half-decent list, in fact, the list peters-out at a mere 9 points. Most of us could argue for days trying to limit the list to the most relevant 10.
Also, I feel the whole petition has an air of finger wagging and tut-tutting about it.
But, for me, by far the most interesting bit is the reference to ‘etiquette’. Having failed twice to spell the word correctly, none of the 9 points refer to any issues of etiquette, (except perhaps point 9, but that’s covered by HC rule 145 anyway, so it’s more of ‘a rule’ rather than manners).
I love the idea of ‘manners’ being added to a list of safe-driving requirements. I love it because of its very definition:-
Quote:
Manners are the unenforced standards of conduct. They are like laws in that they codify or set a standard for human behavior, but they are unlike laws in that there is no formal system for punishing transgressions.
Manners ease the stress of communal living, and mannerly behavior recognizes the right of others to share communal space.
How applicable is that to driving?
I’m now building a tiered requirement for safe driving.
- Knowing how to handle a vehicle
- Knowing what to do (Roadcraft)
- Knowing how to think (Mind Driving)
- Knowing the law (Highway Code etc)
- Knowing your manners
The beauty of manners is it has never been defined, as far as I know, but I bet it would be difficult to list 10 items of etiquette.