Grumpy Old Biker wrote:
SafeSpeed wrote:
Grumpy Old Biker wrote:
SafeSpeed wrote:
FeedbackCode:
action > vehicle > perception > risk model V
^-------------------------------------------
This is looking like a closed loop regulatory system, but the loop isn't closed when you're a passenger. It's easy to imagine how the risk model could go a little wild if you open the loop.
I think I understand what you are saying - My interpretation is that, as a passenger we can go through all the motions of driving except the physical side. And that breaks the loop?
Yeah... that's the theory.
Like a heater with a broken thermostat - the system becomes unpredictable. (Too cold if the heater is always off; too hot if the heater is always on)
OK. I completely agreed with that - but it can only be part of the picture.
Yeah. It's an 'illustrative oversimplification'. The 'risk model' clearly won't actually stop working if we open the loop, and of course we have opened the loop 'upstream' from the risk model. But I can see good reason to expect the risk model to be adversely affected, which of course if the exact effect that we're looking for.
Grumpy Old Biker wrote:
If it were the whole story, for our own mental well being, we would be more content to look out the side window and remove ourselves from the loop altogether.
Better the devil you know, I reckon. In fact for me, I know it's true. As a passenger with a bad driver, I'm pretty much fixated on the road ahead.
Grumpy Old Biker wrote:
If there were a disparity between our and our drivers driving techniques, wouldn't that become quickly evident, even without looking? Wouldn't we start to feel uncomfortable even if we weren't trying to activate our "driving loop"?
Hell yes - see an unmanaged risk and get scared. But 'without looking'? I don't understand that bit.