Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Thu Apr 30, 2026 17:37

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 10, 2006 21:23 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2004 14:47
Posts: 1659
Location: A Dark Desert Highway
is there a break down of who is crashing? Are the riders that have their shiney new sports bike in the garage in all but the best weather the ones that do the most crashing? I wager that the "Weekend Warrior" types that just do a few frantic miles of a weekend do the most crashing per mile and if they weren't on bikes they would be doing something else for the adrenalin rush. Having said that, Bike and bike journos seem to spend alot of time sweeping up press bikes off roads and digging them out of the scenery.

During the summer I saw a young maiden on a plastic stepthrough scooter. She was wearing her helmet, but no gloves, a short sleeved summer dress and nothing on her feet. If she dropped that on her dads drive she would have been sore, never mind falling off at even 10 mph.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 10:12 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 15:27
Posts: 683
Location: New Forest
adam.L wrote:
is there a break down of who is crashing? Are the riders that have their shiney new sports bike in the garage in all but the best weather the ones that do the most crashing?


I have no idea of the actual figures (perhaps Paul has the details) but from memory, the people most at risk are young riders and riders that do a high milage - absolutely no surprises there.

As any seasoned biker knows, just putting the bike away for a week or so, will mean that you loose the "edge", so the casual, occasional weekend rider will not be as good as he thinks he is!

Having said that, the bike handling skills some of the young guys have is wicked. I couldn't dream of doing wheelies or stoppies like they do. Sadly, these skills are only half the story. It can hardly be considered defensive riding!

_________________
It's tricky doing nothing - you never know when you're finished


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 10:44 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 15:27
Posts: 683
Location: New Forest
JT wrote:
Can we further assume that most bikers drift towards car ownership with advancing years, I know I did (and fairly quickly too), so the nett result is that a short exposure to the high risk of motorcycling leaves behind a legacy of improved skills and heightened awareness of risk for the remainder of ones driving career.

So what is the typical span of a driving career? I'd say 5-10 years on bikes, and 40-50 years in cars; as such it may well be that the practicalities actually do bear out the old adage that "everyone should spend a year or two riding bikes" - I guess some do, and they tend to go on to form 20% of advanced drivers...


I agree with what you say, but I think it's only half the picture.

Many people drift back into biking with advancing years - and it's these people who seem to make up the vast majority of people joining the IAM or RoSPA.

The big problem these organisations face is how to attract the younger rider. (Or, indead, the younger driver!)

_________________
It's tricky doing nothing - you never know when you're finished


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 10:51 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
Grumpy Old Biker wrote:
The big problem these organisations face is how to attract the younger rider. (Or, indead, the younger driver!)


That's the government 'culture damage', I'm certain of it.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 14:34 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2004 14:04
Posts: 2325
Location: The interweb
Grumpy Old Biker wrote:
SafeSpeed wrote:
I went round that loop myself and ended up here:

Bikes are so dangerous that bikers are absolutely desperate to do anything that might lessen the risk.

So I reckon it's a losing argument. Unless you can find a way out. (I'm all ears!)


Yeah, well, my rant was obviously a bit tongue-in-cheek and there is absolutely no getting away from the fact that riding a bike is more of a risk than driving a car.


And driving a small car is more of a risk than driving a large car.

If you ban motorcycles then surely you have to ban cycles as well (and probably pedestrians). This will make small car drivers the biggest risk group, so ban them. When you have banned those....


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 14:54 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 10:30
Posts: 2053
Location: South Wales (Roving all UK)
I love the ban motor bikes arguement. To take it to it's logical conclusion remove, bike, then pushbike, then small cars....end up with 4x4's.

Magic.

I imagine there is a significant overlap between the ecomentalists and the speedkills/ban the bike brigade. (big on nannying)

I love these paradox's. I call upon them to square this circle!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 15:19 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
Homer wrote:
Grumpy Old Biker wrote:
SafeSpeed wrote:
I went round that loop myself and ended up here:

Bikes are so dangerous that bikers are absolutely desperate to do anything that might lessen the risk.

So I reckon it's a losing argument. Unless you can find a way out. (I'm all ears!)


Yeah, well, my rant was obviously a bit tongue-in-cheek and there is absolutely no getting away from the fact that riding a bike is more of a risk than driving a car.


And driving a small car is more of a risk than driving a large car.

If you ban motorcycles then surely you have to ban cycles as well (and probably pedestrians). This will make small car drivers the biggest risk group, so ban them. When you have banned those....


This argument has a problem too, because incremental improvements in safety are desirable. Somehow we have to prove that we need to improve safety across the board rather than by 'starting at one end'.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 23:19 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2004 14:47
Posts: 1659
Location: A Dark Desert Highway
Grumpy Old Biker wrote:
JT wrote:
Can we further assume that most bikers drift towards car ownership with advancing years, I know I did (and fairly quickly too), so the nett result is that a short exposure to the high risk of motorcycling leaves behind a legacy of improved skills and heightened awareness of risk for the remainder of ones driving career.

So what is the typical span of a driving career? I'd say 5-10 years on bikes, and 40-50 years in cars; as such it may well be that the practicalities actually do bear out the old adage that "everyone should spend a year or two riding bikes" - I guess some do, and they tend to go on to form 20% of advanced drivers...


I agree with what you say, but I think it's only half the picture.

Many people drift back into biking with advancing years - and it's these people who seem to make up the vast majority of people joining the IAM or RoSPA.

The big problem these organisations face is how to attract the younger rider. (Or, indead, the younger driver!)


I was the youngest driver my Rospa examiner had had at 32. I got id'd on saturday too, but that is another post. :D


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.124s | 11 Queries | GZIP : Off ]