Homer wrote:
The safest form of transport is flying (or so we are told).
Yes, but the dangers of flying are mostly associated with take-off and landing. It is relatively safe because the distances are usually very great. If the average flight was five miles, rather than several hundred, the risk per mile would be greatly increased.
Quote:
After the slight reduction in traffic levels when the London congestion charge was introduced didn't the roads become more dangerous for cyclists and pedestrians?
I've argued on here before that there is a kind of "critical mass" effect of growing car ownership and usage. If you by some means halved the number of cars, and converted millions of people to non-drivers, I firmly believe that more people would die on the roads overall - even if the average driver quality was thereby increased. In the 1950s we were killing twice as many people with one-tenth the number of cars.