Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Tue Oct 28, 2025 10:31

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: GPS Speed restrictor
PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2005 13:05 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed May 25, 2005 13:40
Posts: 70
GPS based camera/hazard/blackspot warning systems are available (eg Road Angel and the like). How about developing a system that detectes what road you're on through GPS and automatically restricts your speed to the current speed limit?

That way it would be impossible (?!?) to get caught by a speed camera.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2005 13:21 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 22:00
Posts: 193
Location: Rutland
But still possible to be driving far too fast for the conditions.

May even see an increase in driving at too high a speed, after all drivers will be within the speed limit so why should they think about the speed they are driving at? Just foot down up to the limiter.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2005 14:03 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 16:12
Posts: 1040
Location: West Midlands
This was an offical suggestion reported on TV a while back. There was a thread discussing it, and the conclusion was that it will be very dangerous because drivers will have even less to do and will mentally switch off..

http://www.safespeed.org.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1892


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2005 20:32 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2004 17:37
Posts: 702
Location: Whitby, North Yorkshire
Oh good grief is somebody still trying to sell that ridiculous idea?

Kill it off once and for all. It'll do far more harm than good.

Best wishes all,
Dave.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2005 00:36 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
TripleS wrote:
Oh good grief is somebody still trying to sell that ridiculous idea?

Kill it off once and for all. It'll do far more harm than good.


Yep.

The "Zombie-Safe" (TM) speed limiter guarantees more crashes at free travelling speed than ever before!

Why worry about speed? Let "Zombie-Safe" take control for you! Relax! No need to pay attention!

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2005 08:32 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 13:55
Posts: 2247
Location: middlish
..so let them do it...

and then explain why the predicted accident reduction hasn't occured.

:roll:

we'll still be driving at the right speed.. won't we now.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2005 08:40 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri May 27, 2005 15:13
Posts: 269
How many more people are going to be maimed or killed in the meantime?

This is not about safety - it is about money!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2005 12:15 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed May 25, 2005 13:40
Posts: 70
Interesting replies. This is along the lines of what I was thinking when I started this topic off, although I'm a bit surprised to hear that it actually got officially suggested :shock:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 07, 2005 16:25 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2004 17:37
Posts: 702
Location: Whitby, North Yorkshire
ed_m wrote:
..so let them do it...

and then explain why the predicted accident reduction hasn't occured.

:roll:

we'll still be driving at the right speed.. won't we now.


Well one could take that approach, but apart from any other considerations I begrudge all the money wasted on these crackpot ideas.

If we were to devote a bit more effort to getting the simple things right, rather than fannying about with expensive and 'clever' schemes, we might just get some better results.

Best wishes all,
David.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 08, 2005 13:41 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 16:02
Posts: 372
Rewolf wrote:
This was an offical suggestion reported on TV a while back. There was a thread discussing it, and the conclusion was that it will be very dangerous because drivers will have even less to do and will mentally switch off..

http://www.safespeed.org.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1892

My current co. car is the first one I've driven with cruise control and the few times that i've tried it i've found that i dont' think about my driving as much.
I don't use it anymore


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 08, 2005 23:00 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2004 14:04
Posts: 2325
Location: The interweb
samcro wrote:
Interesting replies. This is along the lines of what I was thinking when I started this topic off, although I'm a bit surprised to hear that it actually got officially suggested :shock:


Leeds university has had a trial running with a few volunteers and found they drove more dangerously tailgating, taking more chances. This information didn't make it to the final version of their report though, shame I never saved the original. :x


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 09, 2005 01:09 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
Homer wrote:
samcro wrote:
Interesting replies. This is along the lines of what I was thinking when I started this topic off, although I'm a bit surprised to hear that it actually got officially suggested :shock:


Leeds university has had a trial running with a few volunteers and found they drove more dangerously tailgating, taking more chances. This information didn't make it to the final version of their report though, shame I never saved the original. :x


There's still some seriously damaging stuff in the 'phase one' report, which was still available last time I looked. I don't have the link to hand.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 20:13 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 16:24
Posts: 322
I cannot see the technology being used in the near future, because money cannot be made from it unlike speed cameras or black boxes! :gatso3:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 25, 2005 00:14 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2005 13:54
Posts: 134
Location: Hemel Hempstead -
Money can be made from this, because you may be forced to buy this equipment and it be checked on MOT's!

This is the most dangerous thing I've ever heard, not only because it will cause people to switch off mentally, it makes perfectly safe overtaking manouvres far more dangerous. I don't know about you, but if I'm driving in good conditions on a single carriageway on say a 50 limit and someone is going in front at 40 or less, if its safe to do so, I overtake. I could in theory hit around 70 mid-overtake, but I don't suddenly back off the throttle straight away so I'm on the wrong side of the road for less time. Its only once I'm on the correct side of the road that I will reduce my speed to something closer to the limit as I don't want to be on the wrong side of the road for longer than I have to be.

_________________
www.clubrwd.com - For all things rear wheel drive


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 25, 2005 10:32 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 11:18
Posts: 67
Location: Nottingham
daveyboy wrote:
Money can be made from this, because you may be forced to buy this equipment and it be checked on MOT's!

This is the most dangerous thing I've ever heard, not only because it will cause people to switch off mentally, it makes perfectly safe overtaking manouvres far more dangerous. I don't know about you, but if I'm driving in good conditions on a single carriageway on say a 50 limit and someone is going in front at 40 or less, if its safe to do so, I overtake. I could in theory hit around 70 mid-overtake, but I don't suddenly back off the throttle straight away so I'm on the wrong side of the road for less time. Its only once I'm on the correct side of the road that I will reduce my speed to something closer to the limit as I don't want to be on the wrong side of the road for longer than I have to be.


Beware doing this - some mobile talivans position themselves to take advantage of this - there were 2 in Derbyshire the other Sunday.

Both positioned where the road goes straight and people who wish to travel at the national speed limit may wish to briefly exceed this to pass the Sunday drivers doing 45. :shock:

And yes, people get done for this.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 05, 2005 23:13 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
How to create accidents with out actualy thinking


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 498 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.026s | 11 Queries | GZIP : Off ]