The Rush wrote:
You are lucky to have any additional experiential driver safety education supported by your government AT ALL.
Once the so-called 'road test' is passed, there is no experiential training that will save any driver any money whatsoever; in fact it is expressly forbidden by city, state, and federal ordinances on the grounds that ALL experiential training encourages antisocial driving behaviors.
Lum wrote:
WTF? Seriously, can you explain the logic behind that one as I don't understand at all.
I don't understand it either. If your job requires additional driving skills, your job provides the training, but there is no such thing as additional experiential training that a civilian can opt for, that will lower your insurance premiums, or anything like Pass Plus.
Most people who work in government positions where such decisions get made are afraid of a more skilled population of drivers; they might become too intelligent, and start to see through the lies.
The Rush wrote:
At least once a week, I either personally witness, or arrive at the scene of, a fenderbender or some other sort of collision in which no one gets hurt ... initially. On several occasions, one or both of the initial parties refuses to move their cars on the grounds that the officer enroute will want to examine undisturbed evidence. (This is almost never the case; if no one is hurt, the cars should be moved if they are impeding the flow of traffic as soon as possible, under penalty of a fine.) On far too many occassions, this unreasonable urge to preserve the scene becomes the prime causal factor in answering the question, "How many accidents can one accident cause?"
Lum wrote:
I'd hardly call it the prime causal factor. I understand your point that if there wern't a couple of bent cars in the middle of the street then you're not going to have someone driving into them later, but the prime causal factor is surely the fact that someone is such a poor driver that they failed to notice a stationary car in the middle of the street and just drove straight into it.
The fact that you're encountering this situation once a week is somewhat alarming.
We have some incredibly short on-ramps and off-ramps, other have vicious decreasing radii. Couple that with two poor drivers with poor attitudes who can't be bothered to analyze a limit point while trying to flush themselves down at the same time, and at least one of 'em is gonna look like ...
The Rush wrote:
Whenever I see such an initial accident, if I have time to spare in my schedule, I'll try to do something to minimize the likelihood that more cars will add themselves to an accident scene - move an object, place my car just so ... I have ceased to act surprised that the initial parties never do anything to prevent the possibility of a bad thing getting worse.
I wouldn't have to do this if we weren't a nation of novice drivers.
Lum wrote:
Aren't you worried that someone will just crash into your car instead?
Placing my car at a more visible point, long before the radii begins to decrease at all, has - up until now - had the desired effect; other drivers see and slow down well in advance of my car, which also has the additional effect of making them approach the ramp much more slowly, ensuring they will evade the scene to come.