Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Mon May 04, 2026 12:30

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon May 14, 2007 14:49 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/a ... ge_id=1770

Drivers hit with £5m in fines for speeding through roadworks

Last updated at 14:22pm on 14th May 2007

Motorists caught racing through motorway roadworks ended up being hit by more than £5m worth of speeding tickets last year, it has been revealed.

The figures for 2006 reveal how speeding motorists ended up out of pocket after breaching temporary motorway speed limits while roadworks are carried out.

Statistics show the M2, which runs for 25 miles through north Kent from the Medway towns to Faversham, was the stretch of road responsible for snaring the most motorists.

Motorist are being caught out while temporary speed limits are in place
Mobile cameras on this motorway nabbed almost 17,000 speeding drivers.

If all the drivers were traced and then paid up it would have generated an income in excess of £1m.

The M40 London to Birmingham road and the M1 London to the North motorway also nabbed thousands of speeders.

A speed camera safety partnership spokesman said drivers were increasingly being caught by roadwork cameras "because the public don't think the temporary speed limits count".

Drivers are said to display an "apathy" towards the reduced limit in roadworks and are often nabbed doing more than the 70mph limit even when it has been reduced to 40mph or 50mph.

But Paul Smith, founder of the Safe Speed road safety campaign said: "These figures are an outrage. The best science we have says that speed cameras increase crashes and crash severity in motorway roadworks.

"But the Department for Transport is so welded to their false beliefs that they ignore the science and do it anyway. They even tried to hide the report."

"To be fined is bad enough. To get three points is worse. But to suffer that from a system which is proven to increase danger is an absolute outrage."

"It's time for motorists to get angry. I'm convinced that Department for Transport know that speed cameras have made the roads more dangerous overall, but rather than own up to their deadly mistake they have shunted the responsibility for cameras onto local authorities. They would rather save face than save lives and they are clearly not fit for purpose."

Chris Rogers, Project Manager for Kent and Medway Safety Camera Partnership, which has responsibility for the cameras on the M2 and the M20, said: "We are becoming increasingly concerned with the public's apathy with temporary speed limits.

"Drivers seem to be making up their own rules and then falling foul of the actual law. Our message is clear: The limit starts where drivers see the first speed limit signs, which will be before the works start."

Mr Rogers said motorists nabbed by cameras try to evade the penalties by saying things like 'I thought the speed limit started at the first traffic cone' or 'There were no workers there so I didn't think the limit had to be obeyed'.

He said: "Drivers also think that the temporary limit doesn't apply at weekends or overnight even though most schemes do work during the night and at weekends in order to minimise disruption.

"We have had far, far too many offences detected. We are keen to protect workers and the motoring public.

"Often roadworks cause queues in advance of the works and we want drivers to slow down before hitting (literally!) the back of the queue.

"In the works there may be staff and slow vehicles that are turning into or out oif the site, often from the right hand 'fast' lane.

"In most roadworks there are no hardshoulders and so any vehicle that breaks down, gets a puncture or a shattered windscreen has no safe refuge to go to. The occupants of such vehicles will find themselves sitting in live traffic on a busy motorway.

"The consequences should be thoroughly thought out by those drivers who think that temporary speed limits don't really apply."

League Table of Motorway Roadwork Speeders Motorway Location Offences Detected

M2 Kent 16,978
M40 Thames Valley 15,813
M1 Leics+S.Yorks 13,697
M18 S.Yorks 11,177
M4 Thames Valley 10,861
M25 Herts 7,604
M20 Kent 7,455
M5 Avon+Somerset 5,092
M55 Lancs 2,164
M11 Essex 1,871
M6 Staffs 1,267
M42 Leics 524
M180 N.Lincs 62

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 14, 2007 15:28 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 18:38
Posts: 396
Location: Glasgow
SafeSpeed wrote:
""Often roadworks cause queues in advance of the works and we want drivers to slow down before hitting (literally!) the back of the queue.


So, the way drivers avoid hitting the back of a queue is by reducing the speed limit (by this mans logic).
Either the speed limit is reduced to zero or drivers stop by hitting the queue at whatever the reduced limit is. Slightly flawed thinking. :roll:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 14, 2007 16:08 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
Safe Speed issued the following PR at 15:52 today to draw extra attention to the story:

PR482: Motorway Roadworks Camera Fines and Safety

news: for immediate release

Your attention is drawn to the Daily Mail web site:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/a ... ge_id=1770

The comments given by Paul Smith are approved for further use and self-
explanatory.

The background document, the largest ever study of UK motorway road works
safety, is TRL595 from the Transport Research Laboratory.

It is discussed here: http://www.safespeed.org.uk/trl595.html

The motorway road works figures in the report associate:

- Gatso type speed cameras with a 55% increase in injury crashes
- SPECS type speed cameras with a 4.5% increase in injury crashes
- Police patrols with a 27% reduction in injury crashes
- speed cameras with a 32% increase in the proportion of serious crashes

Paul Smith, founder of SafeSpeed.org.uk, said: "The science is clear. They
tried to hide it. Speed cameras in motorway road works are strongly associated
with an increase in crashes."

<ends>

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2007 00:32 
Offline
User

Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 11:46
Posts: 125
I go through the M2 roadworks every day.

What gets me is that after the roadworks have ended (West bound) there is about 1/4 to 1/2 mile where the 50 limit is in force but there are no lane restrictions, cones or anything. Everyone just ignores it as it is also after the last SPECS camera and they know its not covered.

People treat the end of the cones and the last camera as the end of the limit as soon as they pass them its back up to normal speed again.

Mike.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2007 00:42 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 02:50
Posts: 2868
Location: Dorset
SafeSpeed wrote:
"Often roadworks cause queues in advance of the works and we want drivers to slow down before hitting (literally!) the back of the queue.

How incompetent do they think we are?!

_________________
Andrew.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 65 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.076s | 13 Queries | GZIP : Off ]