Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Tue Oct 28, 2025 16:10

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: 124mph Cop
PostPosted: Sat Jul 22, 2006 12:34 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
mega link

MY SHOCK AT 124MPH RIDE IN POLICE CAR

A school teacher has told of his 124mph horror drive - in the back of a police car.

Robert Cox was taken on the 15-mile journey from Swadlincote to Derby at terrifying speeds with sirens blaring so he could take a breathalyser test.

The Bemrose School teacher was later given a 15-month driving ban and a £400 fine for refusing to take the test - but the patrol officer involved was not prosecuted for speeding despite receiving a written warning.

Mr Cox, of Swallow Road, Woodville, said he thought he was imagining how fast the police car was travelling and was shocked to learn the actual speed afterwards.

He added: "If he had sneezed slightly or had a puncture the car would have been out of control and I could have been killed."

Mr Cox's ordeal began when he was stopped on the way home from a pub for allegedly speeding in Swadlincote on December 29, 2004, after he was spotted crossing a double white line.

He was then arrested by PC Chris Newsome when he refused to take a breathalyser test.

Mr Cox said: "I was supposedly doing more than 60mph in a 40mph zone - but I don't think I was going that fast.

"I did refuse to take a breathalyser test but I thought I was within my rights.

"I do wish I had taken the test now, because I don't believe I was anywhere near the drink-drive limit."

Following the incident Mr Cox (52) filed complaints against PC Newsome and another officer over the way they dealt with the arrest.

These claims were investigated and found to be unsubstantiated by the Independent Police Complaints Commission.

However, during the inquiries it was discovered from the police video tapes that PC Newsome was travelling at 91 mph in a 40mph zone and at 124 mph along the A52 in a 70mph zone.

In his recorded interviews, PC Newsome said as an advanced police driver, he felt he was in control of the vehicle at all times.

But a report into the speeding, written by the IPCC, states: "The speeds attained at key moments in the incident, namely 91mph in a 40mph zone and 124mph on a 70mph dual carriageway, cannot be justified in these circumstances.

"The officer does in fact display clear double standards in correctly seeking to stop Mr Cox for crossing a solid white line, only to reach 91 mph in the very same area a matter of minutes later."

The report also reveals that in a letter from IPCC commissioner Amerdeep Somal to Superintendent Debbie Platt, Head of Professional Standards at Derbyshire Constabulary, the question of prosecuting the officer is raised.

The letter, dated October 2005, states: "I suggested that Chief Inspector Paul Berry issue a summons for the speeding offence upon the officer and was informed, following him seeking advice from the force solicitor, that there appears no legal power to do this as the statutory six months time limit had elapsed.

"I agree with this, but am concerned at the delay."

Mr Cox said: "The police procrastinated for six months. I have a letter dated June 2005 saying they were still waiting for the officers in question to reply.

"Then the next thing I know they can't prosecute because it's been more than six months since the incident.

"It's ridiculous."

A spokeswoman for the IPCC said: "Derbyshire Constabulary undertook a local investigation into the circumstances surrounding the arrest and transfer of Mr Robert Cox while in police custody.

"The investigating officer identified that Mr Cox had been transferred in a police vehicle which travelled at excessive speeds, and the matter was then referred to the IPCC.

"The IPCC undertook a managed investigation into this incident, and the investigation concluded that the officer concerned, although an advanced police driver, had travelled at speeds which were not proportionate and appropriate to the situation.

"As a result of this, the IPCC recommended that the officer receive a formal superintendent's written warning."

A spokeswoman for Derbyshire Police would only confirm that an officer did receive a written warning over the speeding incident.

PC Newsome was unavailable for comment.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: 124mph Cop
PostPosted: Sun Jul 23, 2006 11:02 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 00:04
Posts: 2311
SafeSpeed wrote:
"If he had sneezed slightly or had a puncture the car would have been out of control and I could have been killed."

A trained police officer is highly dangerous but he sees absolutely no problem with his own speeding and drink driving. Dickhead.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jul 23, 2006 11:07 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
I don't believe said d**khead was proven to be drunk (though I will admit he most likely was)


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jul 23, 2006 12:34 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 00:04
Posts: 2311
smeggy wrote:
I don't believe said d**khead was proven to be drunk (though I will admit he most likely was)

maybe not legally drunk but he admitted he had been drinking.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jul 23, 2006 16:51 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 10:30
Posts: 2053
Location: South Wales (Roving all UK)
The officer concerned should use his experience of high speed travel to get himself down to the job centre!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 25, 2006 12:26 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 16:02
Posts: 372
Quote:
The Bemrose School teacher was later given a 15-month driving ban and a £400 fine for refusing to take the test


I know it's not the point of the thread, but I know someone who had a shorter ban and lower fine having been convicted of drink driving. Surely that is more serious than simply refusing to take the test?

I'm also curious. Are there any circumstances (e.g. medical) when you can legally refuse a breathalyser test?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 25, 2006 20:17 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
civil engineer wrote:
The officer concerned should use his experience of high speed travel to get himself down to the job centre!


You presumably mean P45 GT

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.015s | 10 Queries | GZIP : Off ]