Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Sat Aug 15, 2026 20:31

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Modified gatsos
PostPosted: Wed Apr 19, 2006 22:17 
Offline
User

Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 21:19
Posts: 1059
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/nort ... 921600.stm

Now facing both ways to catch bikers as well as cars.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 19, 2006 22:51 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 00:11
Posts: 764
Location: Sofa
I don't understand this at all.

Suppose I speed towards a Gatso on my bike. It sees me, front on, exceeding the limit, flashes and takes a pic. Pic doesn't show the registration. What does it do then? Take a picture a random number of seconds later at the point I might be passing if my speed remains constant? Where's the continuity of evidence? What if I slow down after setting it off the first time? If they have 2 pics from cameras facing in opposite directions how do they prove that it's the same bike?

This makes no sense. :?

_________________
Less Kodak, more Kojak.
In times of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 19, 2006 23:46 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2004 18:42
Posts: 1283
Location: Essex
Have had them in Wickford, Essex for about four months now, the two Gatsos are linked.

_________________
Gordon Brown saying I got the country into it's current economic mess so I'll get us out of it is the same as Bomber Harris nipping over to Dresden and offering to repair a few windows.

Chaos, panic and disorder - my work here is done.

http://www.wildcrafts.co.uk


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 19, 2006 23:48 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 00:11
Posts: 764
Location: Sofa
So it's not the hi-tech solution they're suggesting it is then; it's actually just 2 Gatsos back to back?

_________________
Less Kodak, more Kojak.
In times of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 20, 2006 00:05 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
The caption under the photo says “Modified cameras can take pictures from front or rear” so doesn’t seem like two are used.


I thought all Gatsos were approved for rear facing photo so they can capture a bike’s VRM anyway?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 20, 2006 01:20 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
They are Truvelo cameras and they are going to be used in rear facing mode.

Problems with the flash blinding drivers and causing crashes perhaps?

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 20, 2006 01:51 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 13:36
Posts: 1339
I hope this modification is type approved.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 20, 2006 02:04 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 00:24
Posts: 2400
Location: Kendal, Cumbria
I love the observation they make that motorcycles "tend to" only have a rear numberplate.

These people are so unused to handling an actual real life fact that when one comes along they can't resist wrapping it in weasel words...

...allegedly. :lol:

_________________
CSCP Latin for beginners...
Ticketo ergo sum : I scam therefore I am!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 20, 2006 08:26 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
SafeSpeed wrote:
They are Truvelo cameras and they are going to be used in rear facing mode.

Problems with the flash blinding drivers and causing crashes perhaps?

I thought of that but us lucky Pompey people already have a Truvelo which can, and has, been swung around to enforce from the rear. That cam has been there for well over a year (A2030). Is this another case of slack reporting?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 20, 2006 08:30 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
smeggy wrote:
Is this another case of slack reporting?


More like media hungry SCPs wanting to get in the lime light again.

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 20, 2006 10:48 
Offline
User

Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 21:19
Posts: 1059
Is that all it is? Just a turned-round Truvelo?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 20, 2006 11:40 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
mpaton2004 wrote:
Is that all it is? Just a turned-round Truvelo?

The one in the report: I have no idea, doesn't make any sense to me at all.

That Truvelo in Portsmouth: has been set up on the divider between lanes (single carriageway) and can seemingly be set up to enforce for one of: northbound from rear, northbound from front, southbound from front or southbound from rear (I have seen the cam setup for 3 of these combinations). There are 4 sets of pressure sensors placed appropriately, each accompanied with the relevant gatso or truvelo style road markings. The camera arm is adjustable so the cam can get a clear shot of any one of the sensors/markings. I can get a pic of the setup if anyone really wants it. I don’t know if the cam has actually been live in these 4 combinations but I also don’t know of any rule which prohibits this.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 20, 2006 13:19 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 16:34
Posts: 923
Location: UK
Northampton have many Truvelos, this is either them fitting new piezo strips so the cameras can be swung around (as smeggy says, like Hampshire do) or fitting secondary cameras which take a photo of the rear of the vehicle. Presumably this could either be fitted to the camera housing facing forward and fire after a short delay, or a separate unit placed some distance in front of the Truvelo itself.

Gareth


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 20, 2006 19:43 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 00:11
Posts: 764
Location: Sofa
g_attrill wrote:
or fitting secondary cameras which take a photo of the rear of the vehicle. Presumably this could either be fitted to the camera housing facing forward and fire after a short delay, or a separate unit placed some distance in front of the Truvelo itself.

If you're right, how long before they try to charge you for 2 offences, one for each camera?

_________________
Less Kodak, more Kojak.
In times of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 21, 2006 06:38 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
MrsMiggins wrote:
If you're right, how long before they try to charge you for 2 offences, one for each camera?


Under the "old" rules this could not happen. You cannot get two fines in the same enforcement zone. I caught the CSCP out on this one when the issued a bogus press release about getting double fines when the used two cameras in the same zone. It was a creat thread on their now defunct message board.

The rules may have changed now though.

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 21, 2006 09:11 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 15:05
Posts: 1225
Location: Glasgow
Gizmo wrote:
The rules may have changed now though.


It wasn't a 'rule' (because, as we know, the safety partnerships' rules have no legal basis, they are simply a set of hoops they have to jump through in order to get their cash back!)

It was a legal precedent established by case law. You'd need to trawl the decisions since to see if it has since been modified/overturned.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 21, 2006 10:28 
Offline
Former Police Officer
Former Police Officer
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 00:27
Posts: 351
The Truvelo's just north west of Basingstoke on the A339 operate in foward or rear facing mode, they switch between them regularly.

_________________
Former Military Police Officer and accident investigator


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2006 16:50 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
I just now remembered, the camera I described is on Google Maps:

Image

Note the cam in the middle of the pic and the paint markings on the road.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 30, 2006 01:39 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2004 18:42
Posts: 1283
Location: Essex
Th ere is a Gatso in southend that is in a 40 section just before a 70 limit and catches a lot of drivers speeding up in anticipation, vandals have turned the head 90 degrees.

Surley this modification means that it is no longer type approved ??? :twisted:

_________________
Gordon Brown saying I got the country into it's current economic mess so I'll get us out of it is the same as Bomber Harris nipping over to Dresden and offering to repair a few windows.

Chaos, panic and disorder - my work here is done.

http://www.wildcrafts.co.uk


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 24, 2006 09:08 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
Update:

Just found this (it wipes out the Truvelo theory)

Times Online wrote:
The new forward-facing camera has been developed by Gatso, the biggest speed camera supplier, to work in conjunction with traditional rear-facing cameras. The flash of the first camera triggers the second, which takes a digital image of the front of the vehicle, using an infra-red filter to prevent the driver from being dazzled and to ensure clarity in darkness.

The London partnership has bought five of the cameras, which cost £10,000 each, and is installing two on Lower Thames Street in the City next week. Several other partnerships, including Derbyshire, have expressed interest and hundreds of the cameras are expected to be installed across Britain. Trevor Hall, operations manager of the Essex partnership, said: “The cameras have been highly successful in cases where the driver claims it was his wife but the image clearly shows it was a man driving. When people see the images it helps to change their minds.”


http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0, ... 24,00.html

I’ve sniffed around the Gasto site; it would appear they actually do supply a digital camera with infra-red flash.

I know it is illegal to alter a VRM to make it unreadable to any enforcement camera, but AFAIK it’s entirely legal to apply an IR filter to your windscreen to help stop you getting so hot from the sun’s rays........ :evil:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 556 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.108s | 13 Queries | GZIP : Off ]