Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Wed Nov 11, 2026 20:20

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 14:13 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 19:50
Posts: 3369
Location: Lost in the Wilderness
I noticed this 2 days ago...

Daily Telegraph

Quote:
Road pricing scheme 'on verge of collapse'
By David Millward, Transport Editor
Last Updated: 2:56am GMT 17/12/2007

The country's first urban road pricing pilot scheme is on the point of collapse, jeopardising the future of one of Labour's flagship transport policies, The Daily Telegraph has learnt.

With the Government having already shelved a national scheme, it is understood that the proposed local charging experiment in Greater Manchester is now in serious doubt following a cooling of interest from local councils.

Cambridgeshire, the only other area to express any interest in road pricing trials, is also having second thoughts with the controlling Tory group on the county council split over the issue.

The Department for Transport had hoped to announce next month which areas would run the pilot schemes, with trials starting in about a year.

But despite high levels of funding on offer, there has been an embarrassing shortage of candidates with only Cambridgeshire and Greater Manchester having expressed any interest. The West Midlands decided against participating and Shropshire county council pulled out last week.

None of the other six candidates who expressed an initial interest have come forward with detailed proposals.

Greater Manchester had proposed placing an inner and outer cordon around Manchester with motorists paying about £5 a day to commute in and out of the city centre during the rush hour.

But the support of seven out of 10 members of the Association of Greater Manchester Authorities is needed for the scheme to go ahead. Tory-controlled Trafford and Liberal Democrat-run Stockport, oppose the scheme, and they were joined by Bury last week.

Even Bolton - where Ruth Kelly, the Transport Secretary, is a local MP - is understood to be less than enthusiastic. The local Labour group is refusing to give unconditional backing to the proposals, saying that it will take a position only after seeing the full details of what is planned and what public transport improvements are on offer.

Initially, the Government hoped to run trials in a mix of areas, with conurbations showing how road pricing could work in cities and rural authorities such as Cambridgeshire demonstrating its impact in more sparsely-populated areas. As things stand it could be left with neither.

John Spellar, a former transport minister and long-standing Labour opponent of road pricing, said he was not surprised by the difficulties.

"It was always clear that there would be a public reaction and councils would reflect this.

"The Department for Transport needs to get away from this fantasy policy and work with local authorities to ease congestion."

The Conservatives, who support locally-run congestion-charging and road pricing schemes, blamed the Government for the current disarray.

_________________
Useless laws weaken necessary laws.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 22:16 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 21:27
Posts: 247
Location: Near Stockport
What particularly annoys Stockport council is the not too veiled threat that if they don't support the congestion charge, they won't get funding for the long delayed bypass (SEMMMS - dumbed down former A6(M), Manchester Airport Eastern Link Road and Poynton Bypass). This ill-fated scheme was partly built in 1995, but all that was built was the so-called A555 "road to nowhere" (the central part of MAELR) that does little other than distort traffic flows and cause gridlock in Poynton, Bramhall and Hazel Grove during the rush hour.

Also, there is no evidence that there will be corresponding improvements in public transport to attract people off the roads. Indeed one of the first things Arriva Cross Country (who took over the rail franchise from Virgin recently) proposed was that half of their trains would no longer stop at Stockport.

Without adequate alternative provisions, road pricing just looks like yet another way to fleece the motoring public. :evil:

_________________
Brian


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 22:30 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 14:26
Posts: 4364
Location: Hampshire/Wiltshire Border
John Spellar wrote:
It was always clear that there would be a public reaction and councils would reflect this.

This demonstrates a very naive appreciation of how little notice councils take of their residents' opinions.

_________________
Malcolm W.
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not represent the views of Safespeed.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 23:02 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
Quote:
Greater Manchester is now in serious doubt following a cooling of interest from local councils.


Must be getting close to a local election.

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.011s | 12 Queries | GZIP : Off ]