weepej wrote:
Hmm, is it young drivers that have more crashes than anybody else, or new drivers?
A valid question. Most drivers that are new are young but I don't have a figure to be precise (& am exceptionally busy at the minute - or I'd go check it out). It is well known though
that the majority are the young, but it doesn't preclude those that are older.
(General rhetorical questions ....)
What about those that re-take their test - where do they sit within this ?
What about those that have ridden a bike for many years, and then get a car license - they are experienced road users and it would be exceptionally silly to restrict their licenses in this way.
What about those that obtain a license and only have a car many years later ?
This research seems to be aimed at a target for target sake than about any real world benefit.
I see young drivers and especially male's as sometimes needing guiding and honing all that enthusiasm and talent, than see noisy, arrogant idiots looking to impress, although I agree some are !
Helping to show how to be a really good driver helps to show those less experienced how to improve their skills, without this they are left to their own devices and might never learn how to become really good.
Learning how to 'default to safe motoring', should be taught when they are learning.
Alex Jerriums NZ young person's courses successfully taught many young drivers how not to drive to impress, but to drive and be responsible.
I would suspect that many drivers have previously has some road experience when as children they walked to school / took buses or rode by bicycle.