peegee wrote:
why respond if I've been demolish

Because you keep coming up with new ways for us to sink your argument.
peegee wrote:
:shock: Smeegy is advising on expecting drivers to be approaching us slower more legal species of the common spotted driver - at the speed of up to 100mph...
So why does it 'sink my boat'? Do you really believe it is right for you to claim that without any supportive argument? Don't worry, I'm not expecting an answer!
So what
do you do when an emergency response vehicle passes?
How did you manage on the Autobahn? Do you remember those questions I asked you 3 pages ago?
What speed were you doing in L2?
Did you never have to pull into L1?
Did you unnecessarily impede anyone? (especially those whooshing past at 160)
If you can make proper use of lanes over there then why not over here too?
Like I said, if you're incapable of acting appropriately in regard to a differential speed of only 30mph then perhaps you should revise your skill set.
peegee wrote:
as for reliant robinxe - wow - I'm not diverting anything
Given the portion of issues raised that you have dodged, I think we can let the reader be the judge of that!
peegee wrote:
- no one will admit their a crappy driver and like that same "mind set" no one will admit that breaking the law and harrassing people out of your way is not the way forward...
The real crappy drivers are the ones who like to encourage road rage, such as deliberately hacking off other drivers (you must really regret making that first post huh?), so ironically it is you who is doing the harassment.
peegee wrote:
If this is the best we can expect - long may the govt keep the limit at 70 - god of choice help you if they raised it !!! Smeggit and Xe would be going at 120 and bull bars so they can scrape us slo's of their bumpers when they reach their more important destination.
"
you assume too much and try and to "catagorise" people without a stitch of evidence!" Those are your exact words! Your "
inability to avoid personal slights." (again your words) is showing.
Your flawed, dismissive and antagonistic argument style has summed up MLMs perfectly. Keep digging!