Rewolf wrote:
Not load in terms of weight, but load in terms of the turning force that you are trying to get out of them at the same time as reducing the downwards force by lifting off the brakes.
Yes you are right it is the standard advanced method, but unless you have a very enthusiastic driving instructor it is unlikely that it would have been covered while learning. There is a common misconception (I certainly had it until I investigated more) that to take corners fast you go slowest at the tightest point (the apex), so you brake up to the apex, and then power out. This off course gives very little in terms of margin, and is very bad when trying to push a car on a public road. It is so much safer to have complete braking as you turn in, especially when there are 3 or 4 horses in the middle of the road around that blind corner.
Actually I don't agree with this. I think braking into the bend leaves you much better set up to deal with an obstruction. For a start, having your foot on the brake gives an immediate 0.2 second advantage (i.e time to move foot and bring the brakes to biting point). And if you do have to do disaster recovery then at least you already have the suspension balanced towards braking forces. I very much like using the brake to give a bit more turn in sharpness (forwards weight transfer, more front tyre grip), but as the chassis sets, I blend out the brake and I'm just using it for 'attitude control' by the time I'm (what?) 20% into the bend. When the vision starts to open up, THAT'S the time to squeeze the power.
So I've gone from
17 to 27 years old - braking into bends
27 to 34 (?) Full brake-gear / brake-steer separation
34 to now A blended system with brake gear and brake steer overlap in a balanced - and balancing - way.