Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Fri Jun 19, 2026 20:41

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 13:03 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 22:02
Posts: 3266
the newspaper.com
source : Central LondonCongestion Charging sixth anual report
Quote:
London Admits Congestion Charge Failure
Motorists in London, England last year paid £268 million (US $536 million) in charges and penalties imposed in the name of congestion reduction. According to the sixth annual Transport for London Impacts Monitoring report released yesterday, these massive payments have left drivers no better off than they were before the charge was implemented. "The absolute level of congestion during 2007 was effectively identical to the representative value for conditions before the scheme was introduced in 2002," the report stated. "In other words, journey times inside the zone during 2007 were comparable to those prior to charging." Figures show that in the first four months of this year, and in all of 2007, the primary congestion measurement -- the mean excess travel rate -- was 2.3 minutes per kilometer. This figure is identical to the rate measured in 2002, before charging began. "I have always thought that the Congestion Charge is a blunt instrument," London Mayor Boris Johnson said in a statement. "I am therefore introducing a more comprehensive approach to easing congestion in London, one that gives greater consideration to how all transport measures impact on the movement of traffic on our roads." Johnson noted that the report showed an increase in congestion despite an overall 16 percent reduction in the number of vehicles entering the city. The reduction in volume was offset by reductions in capacity caused by intentional and unintentional effects of policy decisions. Unintended side effects included construction projects that caused significant delays and backups. Intentional policies included "pedestrian, cyclist and bus priority measures" that Johnson's predecessor, Ken Livingstone, introduced as a means of discouraging motorists. Livingstone's goal was to make it more difficult and expensive to drive in London. In addition to taking lane space away from drivers to create bus only lanes, for example, Livingstone planned to impose a £25 (US $50) CO2 tax on high-performance cars vehicles and family vehicles while exempting certain hybrids. "I have scrapped the CO2 Charge that risked thousands of small cars flooding central London, and have asked Transport for London to bring forward a range of measures to turnaround the trend and halt the squeezing of road space that has continued to worsen congestion," Johnson said. The cost to operate the complicated motorist tracking and charging system was £131 million (US $262 million) last year. Drivers paid £195 million (US $390 million) in congestion charges, leaving a profit of just £64 million (US $128 million). On top of this amount, however, motorists paid £73 million (US $146 million) in penalty tickets leaving the system with a net profit of £137 million (US $274 million) on total revenues of £268 million (US $536 million). Nearly all of this profit was spent on buses, speed cameras and environmental projects. Only £13 million (US $26 million) was spent strengthening bridges or resurfacing roads. A full copy of the report is available in a 1.6mb PDF file at the source link below.

_________________
Speed limit sign radio interview. TV Snap Unhappy
“It has never been the rule in this country – I hope it never will be - that suspected criminal offences must automatically be the subject of prosecution” He added that there should be a prosecution: “wherever it appears that the offence or the circumstances of its commission is or are of such a character that a prosecution in respect thereof is required in the public interest”
This approach has been endorsed by Attorney General ever since 1951. CPS Code


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 17:52 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 15:00
Posts: 1109
Location: Can't see.
About time.

NEWSFLASH!! people don't go jolly-driving in central london for the fun of it! Just about everyone there has a tangible reason to be there, the small minority of "people who could use other means"- generally those with time and money on their hands- aren't put off by an £8 charge when they saunter into town to blow £££ at department stores.

So we're all agreed this is just a punitive stealth tax?

I'm fairly convinced that government dreams up these schemes in part just to take spendable money from people, perhaps as a way of reducing inflation. Does that work on an economic level? Look at the operating costs of con charging, speed cameras etc, they don't do their job and they dont earn the government money in an effective manner, so what else is there aside from that and as a means of gently introducing people to totalitarian control?

_________________
Fear is a weapon of mass distraction


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 19:53 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 21:10
Posts: 1693
Dont forget, many of these schemes also provide "Work" for otherwise unemployable people and thus allows the government to con us into believing that unemployment rates are lower than they actually are!

_________________
"The road to a police state is paved with public safety legislation"


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 22:52 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 15:00
Posts: 1109
Location: Can't see.
Dusty wrote:
Dont forget, many of these schemes also provide "Work" for otherwise unemployable people and thus allows the government to con us into believing that unemployment rates are lower than they actually are!


they're not people. they're some kind of parasitic humanoid replicant you find in no other walk of life*. I think they're made-to-order in a government laboratory or something.

*actually, an old flatmate had a "friend" who was dumb enough to let slip he was a PCN processor for camden, but clammed up when I asked him some certain questions. I had to leave the room, I'd have thrown him out the flat, but he was guest of my flatmate so you have to respect that. I guess thats the difference between being human and being a PCN processor, respect for people.

_________________
Fear is a weapon of mass distraction


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.009s | 12 Queries | GZIP : Off ]