Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Sun Oct 26, 2025 17:13

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri May 23, 2008 13:38 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 22:02
Posts: 3266
http://www.expressandstar.com/2008/05/2 ... crackdown/
Quote:
Nearly 80 children at schools in a Black Country borough have been handed £75 fines for dropping litter in a series of sting operations since September last year, the Express & Star can reveal.


I am all for reducing the litter dropped but are we just trying to teach them to expect to pay regular fines?
Quote:
Ian Binnie, headteacher at Alexandra High, said: “Some of our pupils have a problem with dropping litter. We are working closely with the council and I requested the wardens be sent to the school.”

_________________
Speed limit sign radio interview. TV Snap Unhappy
“It has never been the rule in this country – I hope it never will be - that suspected criminal offences must automatically be the subject of prosecution” He added that there should be a prosecution: “wherever it appears that the offence or the circumstances of its commission is or are of such a character that a prosecution in respect thereof is required in the public interest”
This approach has been endorsed by Attorney General ever since 1951. CPS Code


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 23, 2008 13:59 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon May 07, 2007 14:05
Posts: 498
Woah woah... "Wardens" - there are "litter wardens" now?

Speechless


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 23, 2008 14:10 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 01:51
Posts: 329
Following the on-going wars against the Poor, the Motorist and the Student the Government today declared war on the Child. A Government spokesman said, "children bring little to the economy, they pay few taxes and the little they pay tends to be on money received from the dependees."

The new operation targets children dropping litter and gives them an on-the-spot fine of £75, more than the average monthly income of children under 16. The Government is keen to point out that growing up and learning should be a expensive privilege, not a right, and that children should have a full knowledge of the law before they're born.

The pro-common-sense group "Children are our Future" said "It is wrong to expect children to obey the law completely and suffer the same penalties as adults. Children should be allowed to make mistakes and be corrected is the most civilised way properly rather than slapped with a fixed fine which they alone probably could not possibly pay. Instead we should focus on educating children, and little-picking programmes, as part of school education. Also the councils should make sure there are enough bins provided where litter is a problem."

"Children are essential to the economy and without children, the economy would collapse with in half a century".

However, Bin, the pavement and grass charity said, "For every 5% increase amount of litter not chucked away, the pavement and grass becomes 5% sadder. We give our full support to the action carried out by the authorities and suggest that more litter wardens be employed. We would also like to see CCTV enforcement and for frequent offenders to wear big name tags."


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 23, 2008 18:11 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2004 14:47
Posts: 1659
Location: A Dark Desert Highway
when I am Prime Minister, people will be shot for dropping litter, fly tippers will have their families shot too. People with noisey exhausts will be fed live into mincing machines.

My house in right next to a bus stop, and my garden gets other peoples litter in it dispite there being a bin right next to the bus stop sign.

This island is too crowded to have selfish gits in it.

Whether or not this is the right or wrong way of getting young people to not drop litter I wouldn't like to say.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 24, 2008 04:27 
Offline
User

Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2005 01:16
Posts: 917
Location: Northern England
Well....Mrs Thatcher did once say: "The polluter must pay" and in this case I agree with her. I've got no sympathy at all with people who chuck rubbish around (it's never near their own home, have you noticed? Ditto for some Dog owners). I'm with you Adam.........However, with the current climate surrounding bin collections and stasi like Councils attitude...I can only see it getting worse!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 24, 2008 07:06 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 18:17
Posts: 794
Location: Reading
Litter-dropping is certainly bad. But the thing that irritates me when I see stories about large fines for dropping litter (even things like cigarette butts) is that I can't help thinking of the "travellers" (I can think of better names for most of them) who dump huge amounts of crap (sometimes literally) everywhere they go and never get punished for it (or for the stealing/assaulting/intimidating/threatening/etc that they do), because the authorities are too scared of them.

Once again, it's a case of the authorities punishing those who they think of as soft and/or profitable targets, rather than those who are the worst offenders, who must be wetting themselves laughing at how they're getting away with it time and time again. It's fine punishing one-off incidents of littering, as long as the more serious offenders are punished in a correspondingly more severe way.

(By the way, I have personal experience of "travellers" doing everything that I have listed. And something tells me they don't register their Range Rovers or top-of-the-range caravans.)

_________________
Paul Smith: a legend.

"The freedom provided by the motor vehicle is not universally applauded, however: there are those who resent the loss of state control over individual choice that the car represents. Such people rarely admit their prejudices openly; instead, they make false or exaggerated claims about the adverse effects of road transport in order to justify calls for higher taxation or restrictions on mobility." (Conservative Way Forward: Stop The War Against Drivers)


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 24, 2008 16:06 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 00:45
Posts: 1016
Location: Mighty Tamworth
The Head Teacher should be ashamed that she couldn’t control the litter problem. There are a lot better ways to educate children about litter. Have we really got so crap in this country the only solution we can ever think of is fining people? Now it’s children pathetic.

_________________
Oct 11 Birmingham Half Marathon. I am running for the British Heart Foundation.
http://www.justgiving.com/Rob-Taylor


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 27, 2008 14:23 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 02:50
Posts: 2868
Location: Dorset
Why try and stop something when you can encourage it and charge people for doing it?

So what do the kids learn from this? Don't get caught.

Is there any legal reason to tell a "litter warden" your correct name/address/etc.?

_________________
Andrew.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 27, 2008 19:42 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 18:17
Posts: 794
Location: Reading
Ziltro wrote:
Don't get caught.

Personally I think that's an invaluable lesson that everyone needs to learn.... :twisted:

_________________
Paul Smith: a legend.

"The freedom provided by the motor vehicle is not universally applauded, however: there are those who resent the loss of state control over individual choice that the car represents. Such people rarely admit their prejudices openly; instead, they make false or exaggerated claims about the adverse effects of road transport in order to justify calls for higher taxation or restrictions on mobility." (Conservative Way Forward: Stop The War Against Drivers)


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2008 21:56 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 20:00
Posts: 115
Location: Berkshire
Ziltro wrote:
Is there any legal reason to tell a "litter warden" your correct name/address/etc.?
The Clean Neighbourhoods and Environment Act 2005 makes it an offence not to give a correct name and address to an "Authorised Officer"


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.022s | 13 Queries | GZIP : Off ]