Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Sat Apr 25, 2026 17:24

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 109 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Jul 08, 2007 16:07 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
Excellent, although depressing, article from James Delingpole in the Sunday Telegraph:

Too scared to speak our mind

Fortunately this forum is one place where you can still speak your mind. Long may it continue :thumbsup:

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 08, 2007 17:07 
Offline
User

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 15:52
Posts: 461
PeterE wrote:
Excellent, although depressing, article from James Delingpole in the Sunday Telegraph:

Too scared to speak our mind

Fortunately this forum is one place where you can still speak your mind. Long may it continue :thumbsup:


Im not so certain you CAN speak your mind here, or anywhere Peter.
Are you so certain of it that youd discuss "sensitive" or Labour "tabooed" subjects such as race or religion, sexual orientation etc?
I reckon youd print it but youd not remain free for too long as this board like others is subjected to government/authority scrutiny by the tiny willied minions who do their nasty work for them.
I reckon if someone said something that has been decreed "illegal" here that the perceived freedoms of speech you think you have (even here) wouldnt be upheld as the isp are duty bound by law to provide info to the police for the purposes of "anti terrorist" operations.
Youre being monitored and they want you to know it so they can control whats said and ultimately thought; a nasty pervasive invasive bunch of stasi cowards.
Watch what you say but do what you want behind their backs and f@ck em all. :wink:

_________________
"Safety" Scamera Partnerships;
Profitting from death and misery since 1993.

Believe nothing- Question everything.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 08, 2007 17:45 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 09:01
Posts: 1548
DeltaF wrote:
Watch what you say but do what you want behind their backs and f@ck em all. :wink:

That's where I'm going wrong then....I'm the sort who calls a spade a spade and doesn't give a fuck what anybody else thinks.

_________________
What makes you think I'm drunk officer, have I got a fat bird with me?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jul 08, 2007 17:57 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 15:00
Posts: 1109
Location: Can't see.
If you don't believe the official line supporting man-made global warming you're not "someone with an different point of view", you're officially tagged a "denier". A clever and tainted catch-phrase to marginalise those who dare challenge what we're told to believe. This is about as scientific as the mob-rule mentality behind witch hunts of the middle ages, and shows how little we've evolved socially since then.

_________________
Fear is a weapon of mass distraction


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jul 08, 2007 19:02 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 14:26
Posts: 4364
Location: Hampshire/Wiltshire Border
I see today that some newly appointed security chief has said that we should all report our family, friends and neighbours who we think may be involved in suspicious activities.

Now, I know he was thinking of terrorism but you know how this spreads like the plague. Pretty soon we will have teachers asking their pupils "Do your parents believe in climate change?"

The police will soon become overwhelmed with reports from busybodies that the man over the road has something suspicious in his garage - a gas guzzler!

_________________
Malcolm W.
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not represent the views of Safespeed.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 08, 2007 19:02 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2004 17:37
Posts: 702
Location: Whitby, North Yorkshire
Gixxer wrote:
DeltaF wrote:
Watch what you say but do what you want behind their backs and f@ck em all. :wink:

That's where I'm going wrong then....I'm the sort who calls a spade a spade and doesn't give a fuck what anybody else thinks.


I wouldn't express it in quite those terms, but I'm pretty much of the same view.

If we don't say what we really feel, we're simply misleading each other and that's no help.

I'm certainly not bothered about being seen to hold a minority viewpoint - it's a regular thing with me. :lol:

Best wishes all,
Dave.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 08, 2007 19:28 
Offline
User

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 15:52
Posts: 461
Gixxer wrote:
DeltaF wrote:
Watch what you say but do what you want behind their backs and f@ck em all. :wink:

That's where I'm going wrong then....I'm the sort who calls a spade a spade and doesn't give a fuck what anybody else thinks.


Youre not going wrong at all, they are.

The likes of you and i were never consulted on what aspects of our liberty; our RIGHTS were to be removed, were we?
No. Bliar and his band of trough feeders just arbitrarily imposed themselves and their mindless ideals on us all, taking advantage of a generation who know nothing of what it means to have to fight for their rights, a generation spoon fed bullshit news and tv programmes that have eliminated any aspirations to become anything but a good tax source and a compliant "citizen".

The films Equilibrium and V for Vendetta share a remarkable similarity with todays situation dont you think?
A whole obsequious population deemed subservient by those who wish to keep us that way, with tax and laws and threats and coersion while those who stole our rights away live the life of privelige and freedom they deny us.

Im very much a straight talker but its a fool who puts himself in a position to be prosecuted just for exercising his supposed freedom of speech, at least until enough people form a resistance of critical mass to do something about it.
Until then, its advisable to talk softly but carry a big stick.

_________________
"Safety" Scamera Partnerships;
Profitting from death and misery since 1993.

Believe nothing- Question everything.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 08, 2007 19:48 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 19:50
Posts: 3369
Location: Lost in the Wilderness
DeltaF wrote:
at least until enough people form a resistance of critical mass to do something about it.


I can't see that happening, unless people speak out in public.

_________________
Useless laws weaken necessary laws.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 08, 2007 19:55 
Offline
User

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 15:52
Posts: 461
Dixie wrote:
DeltaF wrote:
at least until enough people form a resistance of critical mass to do something about it.


I can't see that happening, unless people speak out in public.


France 1942.
Speak out and get shot.

Britain 2007.
Speak out and get "detained".

Parallels are plain to see, its only the degree of control thats different, either way its an assault on freedom and it cannot be allowed to continue, but as in 1942 speaking out isnt the way to defeat them.

The enemy isnt your next door neighbour, or some hypothetical terrorists, its that pack of wankers in parliament, theyre the real terrorists.

Best none violent method to defeat them is simply to not play the voting game.
No votes =no legitimacy.

_________________
"Safety" Scamera Partnerships;
Profitting from death and misery since 1993.

Believe nothing- Question everything.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 08, 2007 20:33 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
DeltaF wrote:


Best none violent method to defeat them is simply to not play the voting game.
No votes =no legitimacy.


Nice idea, till those of us old enough to remember how the unions got taken over.

Can't remember the whole story, but from memory, meetings were made boring for the average member who was a regular to meetings. He and the rest of the centre ground stayed away from meetings, the floor was taken over (by apathy) by the dedicated left, who in turn took over the union.
Even if those of us who cared enough didn't vote, there will always be a hard core who will vote - and that's how we end up in a mess ( just like now ).
Someone on here has a sig , about how crime can't survive when decent folk stand up ( or similar ) -it's the motto of Neighbourhood watch. Perhaps we need something like that to defeat the "control " minority freaks, because they will only be alowed to exercise their power as a minority, if we the majority allow it.

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jul 08, 2007 22:21 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 22:02
Posts: 3266
I find that it is not so much the people who dare not speak out against current thinking, but people in the BBC. Lets face it every news bulletin must Carry a global warming story. Every other builtin must have a kids getting obese story. For years the BBC (and the rest of TV) did not screen a visibly pregnant presenter. Now it is hard to find a female presenter who isn't.

Moving away from the BBC.
The press are reporting forgotten Hull in the flooding. Blaming government... But why, because the press did not report from Hull. All the flood victims were forgotten for a week because the government and the press were obsessed with the new regime at Westminster. 1 square mile in the center of London. Prince Charles was the first to make it up north followed by the one man without a job, Prescott!

Then there is a "terror alert in London" there was megger reporting on the piccadilly incident. Yet the other car that was towed was completely swept under the carpet. Who is pulling the strings? Fleet Street dare not report this cock-up in case they get cut out of the press releases from government? OR was it the shortage of facts? pictures?

_________________
Speed limit sign radio interview. TV Snap Unhappy
“It has never been the rule in this country – I hope it never will be - that suspected criminal offences must automatically be the subject of prosecution” He added that there should be a prosecution: “wherever it appears that the offence or the circumstances of its commission is or are of such a character that a prosecution in respect thereof is required in the public interest”
This approach has been endorsed by Attorney General ever since 1951. CPS Code


Last edited by anton on Sun Jul 08, 2007 22:56, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 08, 2007 22:32 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 20:28
Posts: 1267
Location: not too far in front, not too far behind.
DeltaF wrote:
Are you so certain of it that youd discuss "sensitive" or Labour "tabooed" subjects such as race or religion, sexual orientation etc?
I reckon youd print it but youd not remain free for too long as this board like others is subjected to government/authority scrutiny by the tiny willied minions who do their nasty work for them.


There are two types (in my opinion) of "PC". There is the scourge of all things sensible, "political correctness", which incidentally predates the current Labour government, and there is another "backronym", less currently well known but deserving of an effort to save the PC initials from total loss. That's "Polite & Courteous".

I believe in my time on this board, race, or more accurately racism HAS been discussed at some length, and done quite politely; a "grown up discussion", if sometimes heated. Religion has not been discussed much, but then if no-one is interested in the discussion and it doesn't come up, that's not the same as a taboo. Sexual orientation? Again, as far as I can recall, not been discussed but has never been banned. I'd go so far as to suspect that some of the posters on here prefer relations with men rather than women, but as it's not apposite to the subject matter it hasn't been discussed. If you wish to raise these subjects, as long as you can keep it as an adult discussion, and remain polite and courteous, I would not expect anyone to have a problem with it.

_________________
COAST Not just somewhere to keep a beach.

A young loner on a crusade to champion the cause of the innocent, the helpless, the powerless, in a world of criminals who operate above the law.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 08, 2007 22:50 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 09:01
Posts: 1548
handy wrote:
I'd go so far as to suspect that some of the posters on here prefer relations with men rather than women, but as it's not apposite to the subject matter it hasn't been discussed.

What does someone's sexuality have to do with their views on a given subject?

_________________
What makes you think I'm drunk officer, have I got a fat bird with me?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 08, 2007 22:55 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 20:28
Posts: 1267
Location: not too far in front, not too far behind.
Gixxer wrote:
handy wrote:
I'd go so far as to suspect that some of the posters on here prefer relations with men rather than women, but as it's not apposite to the subject matter it hasn't been discussed.

What does someone's sexuality have to do with their views on a given subject?


nothing at all, that's what the words "it's not apposite" means.

Apposite
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/apposite wrote:
ap·po·site [ap-uh-zit, uh-poz-it] –adjective
suitable; well-adapted; pertinent; relevant; apt:

_________________
COAST Not just somewhere to keep a beach.

A young loner on a crusade to champion the cause of the innocent, the helpless, the powerless, in a world of criminals who operate above the law.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 08, 2007 22:56 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
handy wrote:
I'd go so far as to suspect that some of the posters on here prefer relations with men rather than women, but as it's not apposite to the subject matter it hasn't been discussed.

Do you have a problem with this? Why on earth have you brought it up? It seems totally irrelevant to me.

And what about people who prefer relations with animals rather than humans? :P

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 08, 2007 23:01 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 20:28
Posts: 1267
Location: not too far in front, not too far behind.
PeterE wrote:
handy wrote:
I'd go so far as to suspect that some of the posters on here prefer relations with men rather than women, but as it's not apposite to the subject matter it hasn't been discussed.

Do you have a problem with this? Why on earth have you brought it up? It seems totally irrelevant to me.

And what about people who prefer relations with animals rather than humans? :P


Because some of the posters on here are ladies. Which was the part of the sentence I omitted.

Relations with animals differ from relations with people, in that, as far as I am aware, the former is illegal. Whilst I'm often quoted saying that I can't be sure that I'm straight (despite 10 years of marriage and 4 kids) as I may just not have met the right guy, I'm fairly certain I could never meet the right dog!

_________________
COAST Not just somewhere to keep a beach.

A young loner on a crusade to champion the cause of the innocent, the helpless, the powerless, in a world of criminals who operate above the law.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 08, 2007 23:09 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 22:02
Posts: 3266
handy wrote:
I'd go so far as to suspect that some of the posters on here prefer relations with men rather than women.


Interesting comment! So behid these ID's how do you know who is male, female, streight or gay? Are you assuming that every MR2 owner is a gay hairdresser ? I haven't got a clue on one gay person. I have heard of gaydar, but does it work through typewritten text. I must be missing out on a lot of hidden messages.

_________________
Speed limit sign radio interview. TV Snap Unhappy
“It has never been the rule in this country – I hope it never will be - that suspected criminal offences must automatically be the subject of prosecution” He added that there should be a prosecution: “wherever it appears that the offence or the circumstances of its commission is or are of such a character that a prosecution in respect thereof is required in the public interest”
This approach has been endorsed by Attorney General ever since 1951. CPS Code


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 08, 2007 23:14 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 20:28
Posts: 1267
Location: not too far in front, not too far behind.
anton at 11:09pm wrote:
handy wrote:
I'd go so far as to suspect that some of the posters on here prefer relations with men rather than women.


Interesting comment! So behid these ID's how do you know who is male, female, streight or gay? Are you assuming that every MR2 owner is a gay hairdresser ? I haven't got a clue on one gay person. I have heard of gaydar, but does it work through typewritten text. I must be missing out on a lot of hidden messages.


I refer you to my comment on the post 8 minutes earlier:

me at 11:01 pm wrote:
Because some of the posters on here are ladies.


I have no idea of the preference of most of the posters on here, but I seem to recall one lady referring to "him" when mentioning her partner.

All happy now? :D

_________________
COAST Not just somewhere to keep a beach.

A young loner on a crusade to champion the cause of the innocent, the helpless, the powerless, in a world of criminals who operate above the law.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 09, 2007 00:05 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 09:01
Posts: 1548
handy wrote:
Gixxer wrote:
handy wrote:
I'd go so far as to suspect that some of the posters on here prefer relations with men rather than women, but as it's not apposite to the subject matter it hasn't been discussed.

What does someone's sexuality have to do with their views on a given subject?


nothing at all, that's what the words "it's not apposite" means.

Exactly, so why bring it up?

handy wrote:
I have no idea of the preference of most of the posters on here, but I seem to recall one lady referring to "him" when mentioning her partner.

All happy now? :D

No

For all you know she could be a lesbian and "him" could simply have been the weekday sperm doner.

_________________
What makes you think I'm drunk officer, have I got a fat bird with me?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 09, 2007 10:42 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 10:30
Posts: 2053
Location: South Wales (Roving all UK)
Stop digging and step away from the sexuality hole!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 109 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.088s | 13 Queries | GZIP : Off ]