Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Mon Jun 15, 2026 00:28

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: C+ sarcasm?
PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 12:40 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 17:46
Posts: 823
Location: Saltburn, N. Yorks
Apologies if this has been brought up:-

http://www.cyclingplus.co.uk/forum/topi ... _ID=121017


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 12:58 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 13:55
Posts: 2247
Location: middlish
...boring


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 13:17 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 14:06
Posts: 3654
Location: Oxfordshire
Children looking to score points from any small chink.

Understanding someone's sentiments whilst disagreeing with their actions does not a 'terrorist apologist' make! How many parents of siblings, where one has stolen the other's toy, resulting in the use of violence in an attempt to recover it, has uttered words to the effect of 'I know Timmy stole your toy, but hitting him is not the right way to go about getting it back'.

Someone feels aggrieved, that is their undeniable right. They have absolutely no right to resort to violence, against anybody, in an attempt to resolve their grievance, no matter how powerless they feel to resolve it by other means.


Last edited by RobinXe on Thu Feb 08, 2007 13:19, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 13:18 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
That OP is another agitator who can't swallow his own basic arguments (he asked me a question, I said it could not be answered, he said 'that's rubbish', I asked him exactly the same question - he couldn't and didn't give an answer).

Notice how negative proof is, again, the logic of the day.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 14:10 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2005 08:22
Posts: 2618
Oh dear, I'm not sure what's worse. The content of the thread or the fact that I read it all :lol:

I can't believe the time and energy these people actually spend trying to rubish safe speed...

_________________
Science won over religion when they started installing lightning rods on churches.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 17:04 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2005 23:56
Posts: 252
Location: Manchester
Its all a bit pathetic. More so when you look at the sentiments behind the critical mass events.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.014s | 13 Queries | GZIP : Off ]