Safe Speed Forums

Apologies if this has been brought up:-

http://www.cyclingplus.co.uk/forum/topi ... _ID=121017

...boring

Children looking to score points from any small chink.

Understanding someone's sentiments whilst disagreeing with their actions does not a 'terrorist apologist' make! How many parents of siblings, where one has stolen the other's toy, resulting in the use of violence in an attempt to recover it, has uttered words to the effect of 'I know Timmy stole your toy, but hitting him is not the right way to go about getting it back'.

Someone feels aggrieved, that is their undeniable right. They have absolutely no right to resort to violence, against anybody, in an attempt to resolve their grievance, no matter how powerless they feel to resolve it by other means.

That OP is another agitator who can't swallow his own basic arguments (he asked me a question, I said it could not be answered, he said 'that's rubbish', I asked him exactly the same question - he couldn't and didn't give an answer).

Notice how negative proof is, again, the logic of the day.

Oh dear, I'm not sure what's worse. The content of the thread or the fact that I read it all

I can't believe the time and energy these people actually spend trying to rubish safe speed...

_________________
Science won over religion when they started installing lightning rods on churches.

Its all a bit pathetic. More so when you look at the sentiments behind the critical mass events.