Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Tue Feb 03, 2026 01:58

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 240 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 12  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2006 13:12 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 15:30
Posts: 643
[quote="JT
But the Police clearly stated that the driver's speed was not excessive, which they surely would not have said had they taken steps to warn drivers of the extreme hazard at that specific point in the road.[/quote]

Yes that seems an odd thing to say. 50mph on an icy road does seem excessive but we do not know if the ice was very localised therefore giving the impression that the speed was safe.

I still don't think it is fair to try to blame the Police for the accident.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2006 13:37 
Offline
New User
New User

Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2006 13:02
Posts: 4
Welsh police are out for their own personal gain, why do you think they have so many speed camaras in their BIG COUNTRY!!!!!!!!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2006 13:59 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member

Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 20:14
Posts: 252
Location: Hampshire
A number of factors came together to make this accident more likely.

1. As stated a prior accident attended did not lead to preventative action.
2. The road policies that we have been following where simplistic blaming of speed as the number one cause has been to the detriment of accident reduction measures.
.....lack of road improvement investment with the continuation of single carriageway 60mph A roads with no central barrier.
.....lack of separation with a dedicated cycle route, cyclists must be given alternatives to riding on single carriageways as a policy. May take 30 years but a start has to be made.
..... safety education for drivers (where's the ice warnings? I hear plenty of "if you hit me at.....")
3. Choice by the cylists to ride in icy conditions and on a single carriageway 60mph A road.
4. The choice by the driver of their speed for the conditions and their reaction.

All played a factor, some more than others. But what is required is a focus on real prevention to reduce deaths by 50% within 10years. Cylists I read are now almost as likely to be killed as motorcyclists on rural roads.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2006 14:14 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2006 14:01
Posts: 54
PeterE wrote:
Is it a good idea to go out for a leisure cycle ride in icy conditions?


Is it a good idea to go out for a drive in icy conditions? And anyway, a 60 mile training ride isn't a leisure ride.

Typically, cycling clubs will cancel a run if the roads are frozen, which leads me to believe that the roads were typically OK and that this ice was very localised.

This really is an awful tragedy. I can't see how trying to point some blame on a group of cyclists is being particularly helpful Peter.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2006 14:20 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2006 14:01
Posts: 54
Quote:
Cylists I read are now almost as likely to be killed as motorcyclists on rural roads.


I read that too. However, I would bet that the reasons for the deaths is very different. Bikers tend to kill themselves, but cyclists get killed by others.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2006 14:25 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
Ru88ell wrote:
Quote:
Cylists I read are now almost as likely to be killed as motorcyclists on rural roads.


I read that too. However, I would bet that the reasons for the deaths is very different. Bikers tend to kill themselves, but cyclists get killed by others.


I haven't read that, and I don't have figures at my fingertips to verify the claim. Where does it come from?

If it's correct, it is really quite extraordinay and deserves much investigation and attention. However, in the face of declining driving standards, it is unfortunately something that would have been predictable.

:welcome: Russell. Nice to see you here.

[edited to correct 'fact' to 'face' Doh!]

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Last edited by SafeSpeed on Mon Jan 09, 2006 14:58, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2006 14:34 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 00:11
Posts: 764
Location: Sofa
Ru88ell wrote:
PeterE wrote:
Is it a good idea to go out for a leisure cycle ride in icy conditions?


Is it a good idea to go out for a drive in icy conditions? And anyway, a 60 mile training ride isn't a leisure ride.

Typically, cycling clubs will cancel a run if the roads are frozen, which leads me to believe that the roads were typically OK and that this ice was very localised.

This really is an awful tragedy. I can't see how trying to point some blame on a group of cyclists is being particularly helpful Peter.

I think we have to be careful to differentiate between asking a question and apportioning blame. Did Peter actually say that the accident was the cyclists' fault?

If we don't ask questions to try to understand what happened (and why) we are doomed to repeat the same mistakes over and over again. I think we all agree that outcome would be a tragedy.

Sometimes even uncomfortable questions have to be asked if we are to really understand and improve road safety.

_________________
Less Kodak, more Kojak.
In times of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2006 14:49 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
Bit more on the road conditions in the times -

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0, ... 35,00.html


"Gritters had been along the A547 the previous evening but they proved ineffective against the freezing conditions after a rain shower during the night. "

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2006 14:54 
Offline
Police Officer and Member
Police Officer and Member

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 22:53
Posts: 565
Location: Kendal
SafeSpeed wrote:
Ru88ell wrote:
Quote:
Cylists I read are now almost as likely to be killed as motorcyclists on rural roads.


I read that too. However, I would bet that the reasons for the deaths is very different. Bikers tend to kill themselves, but cyclists get killed by others.


I haven't read that, and I don't have figures at my fingertips to verify the claim. Where does it come from?

If it's correct, it is really quite extraordinay and deserves much investigation and attention. However, in the fact of declining driving standards, it is unfortunately something that would have been predictable.

:welcome: Russell. Nice to see you here.


IIRC, I believe that it is about the same fatality rate for bikers whether motorised or not, somewhere in the region of 20 times the average fatality rate.
That covers all roads, and I have no figures to hand for rural roads.

I'll have a look when I get a chance.

_________________
Fixed ideas are like cramp, for instance in the foot, yet the best remedy is to step on them.

Ian


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2006 14:56 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 00:15
Posts: 5232
Location: Windermere
SafeSpeed wrote:
Ernest Marsh wrote:
I suppose it is reasonable to say that since it was KNOWN to be dangerous, that the cyclists took their life in their hands when choosing this route. There is nothing on their website's events diary to indicate this however! They simply invited everybody to take part, without indicating that any form of risk, or degree of skill level was appropriate.

It's far too early to apportion blame, we know too little about the other accident circumstances, or whether the driver was local, or a stranger to the road.


An anonymous poster felt it important to comment on this and submitted the following via the anonymous forum:

Anonymous wrote:
No one has commented on it, so I thought I'd take the opportunity to do so.

Why did the driver go out then - if it is known to be dangerous? Indeed, why where there any drivers going over any stretch of road that is known to be dangerous.

It's an A road, not a motorway or a racetrack.

It would be great if Paul, you could add a comment as I think the post doesn't do your site any credit if it goes unchallenged.

Thanks.


I feel that in context, the original statement was reasonable. Many have described the road as 'dangerous'. We must explore all the causation factors so that we can understand how such tragedies can be avoided in the future. I don't believe that Ernest was apportioning blame, I think he was exploring possible responsibilities. I can see room for misinterpretation however.

My point here was that while the comment made after the event described the route as dangerous (and also quoted a police survey in which this road was said to be in the top eleven most dangerous roads in the area) there was no warning in the events diary that riders need be experienced (other than that implied in it was a 60 mile ride).
Even the 14 year old boy who was unfortunately killed, must have been fairly experienced to be on a 60 mile ride. I therefore take the view that they accepted an "informed" risk, as do any riders who choose to share a road with other vehicles.
Here between Staveley and Windermere, the risk was considered great enough for the council to spend over one hundred thousand pounds on a separate cycle and foot path - which SOME cyclists choose not to use.

Elsewhere, some have seen fit to lay ALL the blame with the motorist, and have even gone so far as to imply that his driving was murderous. I do NOT hold to that opinion, even without the full facts!
I would suggest that if you visit the cycle club website, you will become more informed as to the abilities of the riders, and the purpose of these rides.
There has been no mention of the speed of the cyclists (which is not really relevant to the CAUSE of the accident) only that of the car, which appears to have been the lastest in a number of vehicles taken by surprised on that curve, one accident taking place earlier in the morning. :( However, if the conditions were so bad on the road surface, the cyclists too may have come to grief by their own hand had circumstances not intervened - as happens from time to time.

Thank you for your support Paul - I hope this has cleared up the matter to the satisfaction of the concerned poster.

_________________
Time to take responsibility for our actions.. and don't be afraid of speaking out!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2006 15:08 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
Ru88ell wrote:
Bikers tend to kill themselves.


Hold on there. Why do bikers kill themselves?

You need to think for yourself rather than use media stereotyping.

from the BMF report to the EU
Quote:
the perception that riders are primarily responsible for collisions is incorrect, a high proportion of crashes were caused by other road users looking but failing to see and most collisions took place at low speeds.

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Last edited by Gizmo on Mon Jan 09, 2006 15:10, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2006 15:09 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
The bit about cycle fatalities is from a campaign by Brake to make helmets compulsary -possibly in other papers , i found it in the times --

http://driving.timesonline.co.uk/articl ... 18,00.html

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2006 15:25 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 18:38
Posts: 396
Location: Glasgow
Gizmo wrote:
Ru88ell wrote:
Bikers tend to kill themselves.


Hold on there. Why do bikers kill themselves?

You need to think for yourself rather than use media stereotyping.


Stole my thunder Gizmo. A lot of bike deaths are S.M.I.D.S.Y.s


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2006 16:08 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2006 14:01
Posts: 54
Gizmo wrote:
Ru88ell wrote:
Bikers tend to kill themselves.


Hold on there. Why do bikers kill themselves?

You need to think for yourself rather than use media stereotyping.

[/quote]

This is the opinion of m/cycle police officers that I hang around with. If I'm wrong then I'll apologise.

I note that no-one disagrees that cyclists get killed by other road users.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2006 16:39 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 00:15
Posts: 5232
Location: Windermere
I think in certain locations, there is a higher incidence of bikers being injured/killed with no other vehicles involved.
IanH may be able to confirm, but I seem to recall that is the case in Cumbria, where we have large numbers of visiting bikers who misjudge bends etc. - hence the CSCP's dont crunch after lunch campaign.

I am sure that on commuter routes, and town centres that SMIDSY is a greater threat.
This is down to perceptions again, from personal viewpoints. It's all too easy to make sweeping statements without thinking of other scenarios. :(

_________________
Time to take responsibility for our actions.. and don't be afraid of speaking out!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2006 17:25 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
Ru88ell wrote:
I note that no-one disagrees that cyclists get killed by other road users.


Only by virtue of the fact that they almost always come off worst.

How about culpability
#No lights
#No reflective clothing
#Ignoring the highway code (shooting red lights, crossing etc)

This is not the case in this story but this winter I have seen numerous cases where cyclist are virtually invisible in the dark. Highly dangerous.

My daughter rides a scooter that is restricted to 30 mph. She has to have passed her compulsory basic training, wear a helmet. She also wears leather gloves, armoured jacket and boots. The bike has to have an MOT. A cyclist, many of which are capable of reaching 30mph can ride anything, just wear lycra and virtually ignore the highway code without any chance of reprimanded by the law.

Maybe this is a wake-up call for compulsory protective clothing for cyclists.

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2006 18:42 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
Ru88ell wrote:
PeterE wrote:
Is it a good idea to go out for a leisure cycle ride in icy conditions?

Is it a good idea to go out for a drive in icy conditions? And anyway, a 60 mile training ride isn't a leisure ride.

Obviously it is a leisure ride, as the objective is the ride itself. Therefore there is more discretion as to whether you do it or not, compared with say cycling to work.

Quote:
This really is an awful tragedy. I can't see how trying to point some blame on a group of cyclists is being particularly helpful Peter.

I wasn't trying to point any blame at them at all. But all road users must realise if they go out in hazardous conditions that their risk of being involved in an accident, whether their own fault or not, is increased.

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2006 19:00 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
new from the Beeb:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/4596500.stm

Contains:

Police wanted crash road gritted

Police have said they asked for a north Wales road to be gritted an hour before a crash which killed four cyclists.


To my mind ths makes the Police position even worse. It confirms that they knew there was danger.

(still angry...)

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2006 19:24 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 00:04
Posts: 2311
Gizmo wrote:
Maybe this is a wake-up call for compulsory protective clothing for cyclists.

in this case, and no doubt most cases where cyclists are killed by cars, how would that have helped exactly?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2006 19:39 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
johnsher wrote:
Gizmo wrote:
Maybe this is a wake-up call for compulsory protective clothing for cyclists.

in this case, and no doubt most cases where cyclists are killed by cars, how would that have helped exactly?


It depends on the accident. If all 4 victims were crushed under the car (doubtful) then protective would not help. But I suspect it is likely that some involved head injury and the pathetic bits of polystyrene that they wear, if the even had this, would not be much help.

My daughter also rides horses. Her hat is built to a protection standard that is far greater than any cycling "toy" lid.

What has happened was a tragic accident. But sometimes thats all it takes.....an accident.

At the moment we have very limited information. We will have to wait and see for the official information, port mortem.

Quote:
a typical (cycling) helmet will absorb the energy of a fall from a stationary or slow-moving bicycle, an impact speed of around 12mph, but will reduce the energy of a 30mph impact to only 27.5mph

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Last edited by Gizmo on Mon Jan 09, 2006 19:48, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 240 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 12  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 49 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.043s | 11 Queries | GZIP : Off ]