SafeSpeed wrote:
Ernest Marsh wrote:
I suppose it is reasonable to say that since it was KNOWN to be dangerous, that the cyclists took their life in their hands when choosing this route. There is nothing on their website's events diary to indicate this however! They simply invited everybody to take part, without indicating that any form of risk, or degree of skill level was appropriate.
It's far too early to apportion blame, we know too little about the other accident circumstances, or whether the driver was local, or a stranger to the road.
An anonymous poster felt it important to comment on this and submitted the following via the anonymous forum:
Anonymous wrote:
No one has commented on it, so I thought I'd take the opportunity to do so.
Why did the driver go out then - if it is known to be dangerous? Indeed, why where there any drivers going over any stretch of road that is known to be dangerous.
It's an A road, not a motorway or a racetrack.
It would be great if Paul, you could add a comment as I think the post doesn't do your site any credit if it goes unchallenged.
Thanks.
I feel that in context, the original statement was reasonable. Many have described the road as 'dangerous'. We must explore all the causation factors so that we can understand how such tragedies can be avoided in the future. I don't believe that Ernest was apportioning blame, I think he was exploring possible responsibilities. I can see room for misinterpretation however.
My point here was that while the comment made after the event described the route as dangerous (
and also quoted a police survey in which this road was said to be in the top eleven most dangerous roads in the area) there was no warning in the events diary that riders need be experienced (other than that implied in it was a 60 mile ride).
Even the 14 year old boy who was unfortunately killed, must have been fairly experienced to be on a 60 mile ride. I therefore take the view that they accepted an "informed" risk, as do any riders who choose to share a road with other vehicles.
Here between Staveley and Windermere, the risk was considered great enough for the council to spend over one hundred thousand pounds on a separate cycle and foot path - which SOME cyclists choose not to use.
Elsewhere, some have seen fit to lay ALL the blame with the motorist, and have even gone so far as to imply that his driving was murderous. I do NOT hold to that opinion, even without the full facts!
I would suggest that if you visit the cycle club website, you will become more informed as to the abilities of the riders, and the purpose of these rides.
There has been no mention of the speed of the cyclists (which is not really relevant to the CAUSE of the accident) only that of the car, which appears to have been the lastest in a number of vehicles taken by surprised on that curve, one accident taking place earlier in the morning.

However, if the conditions were so bad on the road surface, the cyclists too may have come to grief by their own hand had circumstances not intervened - as happens from time to time.
Thank you for your support Paul - I hope this has cleared up the matter to the satisfaction of the concerned poster.