Pete317 wrote:
Diesel's economy is really artificial - created by the taxing structure. Pound for pound, diesel has about the same calorific value as petrol but, because it's a denser fuel, a gallon of diesel takes you further than a gallon of petrol. The only real advantage of diesel is that you can get away with a smaller tank.
I prefer driving a run-of-the-mill diesel to a run-of-the-mill petrol though - you get a lot more bottom-end torque. However, the diesel runs out of steam pretty sharply at higher revs, so, for example, dropping a gear to overtake sometimes works against you.
However, a large or turbocharged petrol engine wins hands down for me.
My Pug 406 with it's 70 litre tank means I get about 700 miles out of a tank - very useful given that I have a daily commute of about 120 miles. What I don't understand is why diesel fuel costs more than petrol - that does offset the economical value slightly. For once it's not the government as duty rates on uleaded and diesel are the same (47.9p/l I think). Although the extra £10 on VED the government imposes on diesels doesn't make sense - I thought lower CO2 emissions meant lower VED
I will admit working out the best rev range, when and where the turbo kicks in does take a bit of getting used to - a lot more than on a petrol. Once used to it though I have no probs overtaking safely on a NSL SC
