Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Sat May 30, 2026 15:08

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 101 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 20:19 
Offline
User

Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 09:26
Posts: 350
hairyben wrote:
Peyote wrote:
I suppose it could be argued that giving any employee a parking space is effectively a tax free perk anyway.

Given that the journey (regardless of mode of transport) is essentual and business related, how is a parking space a tax free perk?
Sometimes I have to pay the meter, or buy permissions to park for my van, these are tax deductable expenses.


I was under the impression that a commute isn't a "business related" journey form a taxable perspective. It's certainly a journey I've never been able to claim for. The free parking space is just that, it's a benefit that is free. Many businesses operate car parks that users have to pay for, in these cases, it isn't a perk.


hairyben wrote:
Peyote wrote:
It could also be considered unfair on those who choose not to commute by single occupancy car in that they are missing out on this perk.

And it's unfair that some people get a desk by the window, and it's unfair that the floor upstairs have a better coffee machine, etc etc etc. Life isn't "fair", concentrate on the things that matter. Sometimes it seems we're a nation of people jealous of others for having things we ourselves don't need or want.


Oh come on! If you're going to come out with that kind of argument, then I can just turn around and say "Well, you've got no choice but to drive to work, so tough luck, you've got to pay the parking tax. If you don't think that's fair, well? life isn't fair!"

hairyben wrote:
Peyote wrote:
I'll try and dig out the stats, but I believe the cost of actually providing a parking space for an employee is somewhere around £3 a day anyway!

I would imagine that Nottingham, being quite a large town (or is it a city?) would have relatively good public transport links, so (and I appreciate I'm speculating wildly here) it could be the case that a significant number of those who do currently commute in a single occupancy car have other options available to them. Of course a decent Travel Plan to actually provide information and incentives would be a damn good idea to run in conjunction with the tax-parking-space scheme.


Perfect public transport will never exist, and right now it's often not evan adequate. London has a great deal of public transport, so it's fair to make the sweeping generalisation that those who live here and work in an office shouldn't drive at all right? but heres two examples:

My flatmate is PA for someone tremendously important. She often works 14-16 hour days, and uses her car to ferry clients about, and can you blame her for not wanting to share public transport with drunks and bums after a long hard day?

Someone else I know lives in muswell hill and works in swiss cottage. thats sub-15 mins by car, sub-£10 of fuel per week, or 1hr+ on several busses or trains, and about £25+ for a pass.


Hey, I never said a perfect public transport system did exist! I've never believed everyone has a choice in how they get to work, hence me saying that "a significant number" could have other options other than single occupancy vehicle travel. It's not a case of one (private transport) or the other (public transport), it never will be without ridiculous (and practically impossible) investment in a public transport system. That doesn't mean the current status-quo isn't in dire need of changing though...


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 20:21 
Offline
User

Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 09:26
Posts: 350
Dixie wrote:
And, how long before they start charging us for parking at home.


I guess you've already paid for it by buying the land in the first place. Is council tax related to the amount of off-street parking you've got?

Dixie wrote:
A privilege to have your own off road parking.


It already is! See above and having the money to buy enough space to park you car/cars.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 20:32 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 19:50
Posts: 3369
Location: Lost in the Wilderness
Peyote wrote:
Dixie wrote:
And, how long before they start charging us for parking at home.


I guess you've already paid for it by buying the land in the first place. Is council tax related to the amount of off-street parking you've got?

Dixie wrote:
A privilege to have your own off road parking.


It already is! See above and having the money to buy enough space to park you car/cars.


Ah, but did councils look at it like that 25 years ago, when I first bought my house?

_________________
Useless laws weaken necessary laws.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 20:50 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 14:26
Posts: 4364
Location: Hampshire/Wiltshire Border
Ah! Nice one about homeworkers.

When the office staff have to pay to park, I'll charge the home based staff too. It's only fair. :lol:

_________________
Malcolm W.
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not represent the views of Safespeed.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 20:55 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
When they introduced parking charges where my wife worked as a nurse at a local hospital (wiping out her pay rise) it was the last straw and she quit. She now works at a local school! Free parking and NHS's loss! Many Nurses parked on a local housing estate and walked to work from there. Not good for the residents.

There is no doubt that parking charges have caused many lower payed staff to leave.

I think the vast majority of private companies will foot the bill for the staff if it goes ahead, otherwise they will lose people. The upshot will be higher salarys and an increase in inflation.

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 21:12 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
Peyote wrote:
I suppose it could be argued that giving any employee a parking space is effectively a tax free perk anyway. It could also be considered unfair on those who choose not to commute by single occupancy car in that they are missing out on this perk. I'll try and dig out the stats, but I believe the cost of actually providing a parking space for an employee is somewhere around £3 a day anyway!

I recall discussing this before, but unless a workplace is in a location where the only alternative parking is paid-for I fail to see how free workplace parking can be considered a taxable benefit. And, given that employers provide all kinds of benefits that are not taken up by all employees, the "missing out" argument doesn't really wash. Interest-free season ticket loans, maybe?

Given that most employers own the freehold of the land on which they're situated, I can't see how the cost of providing a parking space can be anything remotely like £3 a day unless you compare it with the theoretical alternative of selling off the land. And I used to work for British Aerospace at Woodford who had an airfield on which you could easily park ten thousand cars.

In fact, by keeping employees' parked cars off local roads, employers providing free parking are giving the local authority a benefit :)

Peyote wrote:
I would imagine that Nottingham, being quite a large town (or is it a city?) would have relatively good public transport links, so (and I appreciate I'm speculating wildly here) it could be the case that a significant number of those who do currently commute in a single occupancy car have other options available to them. Of course a decent Travel Plan to actually provide information and incentives would be a damn good idea to run in conjunction with the tax-parking-space scheme.

Maybe, but I'm sure there are still large numbers of employees who, because of the location of their workplace and/or home, and the time of day they are commuting, do not have a practical public transport alternative, in which case it seems grossly unfair to levy a charge on them for commuting by car. And if you confine yourself to workplaces accessible by PT, you greatly limit your job options.

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 21:40 
Offline
User

Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 09:26
Posts: 350
PeterE wrote:
Peyote wrote:
I suppose it could be argued that giving any employee a parking space is effectively a tax free perk anyway. It could also be considered unfair on those who choose not to commute by single occupancy car in that they are missing out on this perk. I'll try and dig out the stats, but I believe the cost of actually providing a parking space for an employee is somewhere around £3 a day anyway!

I recall discussing this before, but unless a workplace is in a location where the only alternative parking is paid-for I fail to see how free workplace parking can be considered a taxable benefit. And, given that employers provide all kinds of benefits that are not taken up by all employees, the "missing out" argument doesn't really wash. Interest-free season ticket loans, maybe?

Given that most employers own the freehold of the land on which they're situated, I can't see how the cost of providing a parking space can be anything remotely like £3 a day unless you compare it with the theoretical alternative of selling off the land. And I used to work for British Aerospace at Woodford who had an airfield on which you could easily park ten thousand cars.


I think the calculations must've been based on either theoretical costs of selling off the land, or on the building and subsequent maintenance of the car park (hard engineering, security etc.). I'm not sure interest free loans could really be considered in the same league as the subsidies provided to motorists (my current employer provides such loans upto £500 spread over 12 months), but I take your point. Maybe if there was more equity than those who do/can choose not to commute by car would be more likely to do so?

PeterE wrote:
In fact, by keeping employees' parked cars off local roads, employers providing free parking are giving the local authority a benefit :)


Ha ha! You could also argue that by keeping them from parking in LA car parks they are starving the LA of valuable revenue!

PeterE wrote:
Peyote wrote:
I would imagine that Nottingham, being quite a large town (or is it a city?) would have relatively good public transport links, so (and I appreciate I'm speculating wildly here) it could be the case that a significant number of those who do currently commute in a single occupancy car have other options available to them. Of course a decent Travel Plan to actually provide information and incentives would be a damn good idea to run in conjunction with the tax-parking-space scheme.

Maybe, but I'm sure there are still large numbers of employees who, because of the location of their workplace and/or home, and the time of day they are commuting, do not have a practical public transport alternative, in which case it seems grossly unfair to levy a charge on them for commuting by car. And if you confine yourself to workplaces accessible by PT, you greatly limit your job options.


Oh yes, I have no issue with the perceived unfairness of such a tax, just like the current VED and fuel tax are also unfair. I was merely trying to put forward a differing viewpoint, rather than specifically going out of my way to defend the car-parking-space levy. I'm not sure there is an answer to reducing congestion that isn't unfair to some folk though.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 21:42 
Offline
User

Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 09:26
Posts: 350
Dixie wrote:

Ah, but did councils look at it like that 25 years ago, when I first bought my house?


My previous post was actually a question! I don't know if councils do, or did look at parking when assessing council tax (or it's predecessors)!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 21:52 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 02:50
Posts: 2868
Location: Dorset
Peyote wrote:
PeterE wrote:
In fact, by keeping employees' parked cars off local roads, employers providing free parking are giving the local authority a benefit :)


Ha ha! You could also argue that by keeping them from parking in LA car parks they are starving the LA of valuable revenue!

But parking restrictions are never, ever, ever used to generate revenue!

_________________
Andrew.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 14, 2008 00:27 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 00:54
Posts: 327
Location: Rural Somerset
If my employers want to get me "out of my car and on to public transport" that's fine by me.

However, the fact that I will then be able to work for them only on Wednesdays, between 11.30 am and 2.30 pm, might be a bit of a drawback.

_________________
Save a cow - eat a vegetarian


Last edited by Yokel on Thu May 15, 2008 21:14, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 14, 2008 18:15 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
I've split the general discussion about local taxation to a new topic here:

viewtopic.php?f=13&t=18328

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2008 02:57 
Offline
User

Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2005 01:16
Posts: 917
Location: Northern England
Here we go!.....As soon as Gordo' puts a tax on private parking spaces.........the private railway and bus Companies will see a gap in the market to increase their fares by the same amount despite there being no further pressure on them by the move......

We'll end up..(if we haven't already) with the most expensive, useless, self serving, public transport system in the world!

What was it that John Major said: "Back to Basics"?...............Yep! you betcha John....you betcha!

Chickens....Roost........Home!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2008 08:05 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 04:10
Posts: 3244
As soon as the public transport was sold-off into private_public_transport it was apparent that little profit would be made.
So the biz became publicly subsidised privately owned transport.
After all, no point selling something that would make a loss is there ?
In any case, if you want a good read, with no bias, try THIS.
From THIS

_________________
The world runs on oil, period. No other substance can compete when it comes to energy density, flexibility, ease of handling, ease of transportation. If oil didn’t exist we would have to invent it.”

56 years after it was decided it was needed, the Bedford Bypass is nearing completion. The last single carriageway length of it.We have the most photogenic mayor though, always being photographed doing nothing


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2008 12:51 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
Quote:
Peyote
Ha ha! You could also argue that by keeping them from parking in LA car parks they are starving the LA of valuable revenue!


Not stirring things ,but how much does the interest free loans for council employees vehicles (if still going on) does it starve the public purse of funds ?? :shock:

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2008 13:45 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 04:10
Posts: 3244
Let's not forget the infamous"mileage allowance" as well.
Something like £0.97 per mile.
And also the "not-so-hidden" subsidy of free secure parking, at taxpayers expense. Where we get preached-to about being profligate polluters, and told to use "park-and-ride", while the council employees (mostly in town centres) get to drive to said carparks.
Or like mid-beds council, move to a country-side location, in brand-new offices, with minimal PT, but a large carpark.
Nothing like a bit of local-council-hypocrisy, like we've never noted that before have we ?

_________________
The world runs on oil, period. No other substance can compete when it comes to energy density, flexibility, ease of handling, ease of transportation. If oil didn’t exist we would have to invent it.”

56 years after it was decided it was needed, the Bedford Bypass is nearing completion. The last single carriageway length of it.We have the most photogenic mayor though, always being photographed doing nothing


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2008 14:10 
Offline
User

Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 09:26
Posts: 350
botach wrote:
Not stirring things ,but how much does the interest free loans for council employees vehicles (if still going on) does it starve the public purse of funds ?? :shock:


I really don't know how much I'm afraid Botach, I would hazard a guess that it wouldn't be a significant amount as the maximum you're allowed is £500. I get the impression it isn't particularly overly subscribed either!

jomukuk wrote:
As soon as the public transport was sold-off into private_public_transport it was apparent that little profit would be made.
So the biz became publicly subsidised privately owned transport.


Yep, you would've thought that somebody would've considered very early on in the feasibility study bit of the project! -

"Hang on Folks, PT costs us £xxx much a year already, how are we going to sell it the private sector without suffering drastically reduced services or massive subsidies?"

jomukuk wrote:
Let's not forget the infamous"mileage allowance" as well.
Something like £0.97 per mile.
And also the "not-so-hidden" subsidy of free secure parking, at taxpayers expense. Where we get preached-to about being profligate polluters, and told to use "park-and-ride", while the council employees (mostly in town centres) get to drive to said carparks.
Or like mid-beds council, move to a country-side location, in brand-new offices, with minimal PT, but a large carpark.
Nothing like a bit of local-council-hypocrisy, like we've never noted that before have we ?


97p a mile??? Jeez, I'm in the wrong job! In my previous and current employment the going rate is 40p a mile. Mind you, it wouldn't make a difference to me anyway.

Lots of hyprocrisy in local councils? You won't get any argument from me about that!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 16, 2008 14:05 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
jomukuk wrote:
Let's not forget the infamous"mileage allowance" as well.
Something like £0.97 per mile.
And also the "not-so-hidden" subsidy of free secure parking, at taxpayers expense. Where we get preached-to about being profligate polluters, and told to use "park-and-ride", while the council employees (mostly in town centres) get to drive to said carparks.
Or like mid-beds council, move to a country-side location, in brand-new offices, with minimal PT, but a large carpark.
Nothing like a bit of local-council-hypocrisy, like we've never noted that before have we ?



And that paid to councillors to get to meetings .
Then again - most council employees cars I see have a pass for all carparks in that area .
Did someone mention -season tickets - seem to remember that govt employees had an interest free loan scheme for this .

Then again - years ago I worked for GEC - we had a staff shop -where we could buy goods at a discount - most of the large supermarkets do this -why stop at free parking ??.But then some Chancellor decided that free shares to staff was a perk -till the press got involved.

And to top it all -what about the "Members bar " in the Commons ???-is this why MPs expenses are transparent - we might see how much this is subsidised . :twisted:

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 18, 2008 23:22 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 23:24
Posts: 94
Excellent news. All credit to Nottingham for blazing this trail. :clap:

_________________
Will the last person to leave please turn out the lights?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 18, 2008 23:49 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 18:17
Posts: 794
Location: Reading
glaikie wrote:
Excellent news. All credit to Nottingham for blazing this trail. :clap:

But hang on, you're a self-confessed car-hater. So even if this idea was bad news for employers and employees alike, and even if it wasn't going to improve congestion, you'd still support it just because it punished people for using their cars. So the fact that you do support it is hardly a surprise, and in no way means that it's a good idea for anyone except spiteful, busybodying motorist-haters.

Anyway, despite your crowing you know really that this is a very scaled-down substitute for what the car-haters really want: you must be hopping mad about the fact that people don't want road pricing in Nottingham, Edinburgh, Manchester, Cambridge, west London or anywhere else in the UK. No doubt you'd like to force it on them anyway; after all, persecuting motorists is more important than upholding democracy (as well as reducing accidents and everything else really).

Your sole saving grace is that you admit to being anti-car. Weepej is anti-car as well, but for some reason (shame?) he won't admit it; perhaps you would be interested in persuading him to.

_________________
Paul Smith: a legend.

"The freedom provided by the motor vehicle is not universally applauded, however: there are those who resent the loss of state control over individual choice that the car represents. Such people rarely admit their prejudices openly; instead, they make false or exaggerated claims about the adverse effects of road transport in order to justify calls for higher taxation or restrictions on mobility." (Conservative Way Forward: Stop The War Against Drivers)


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 19, 2008 07:45 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 14:26
Posts: 4364
Location: Hampshire/Wiltshire Border
glaikie wrote:
Excellent news. All credit to Nottingham for blazing this trail. :clap:

You are cheering the imposition of price rises in everything for the sake of appearing "green". This measure is just an excuse to raise business taxes dressed up as something else and will have no discernable effect on car use. For the reasons given above, very few employers will be able or willing to pass this charge on to employees. Prices will be raised to compensate and thus it will all become a piece of pointless gesture politics.

_________________
Malcolm W.
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not represent the views of Safespeed.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 101 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.115s | 11 Queries | GZIP : Off ]