Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Tue Feb 03, 2026 13:29

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 296 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 ... 15  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 04, 2007 01:12 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 04:10
Posts: 3244
Quote:
He forked-out £7500 to install solar panels on his roof


Check out the amounts of rare metals/elements used in the construction of solar cells. Many have only a few decades before the worlds supply is depleted.

http://www.digitaltvdesignline.com/news/199901448


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 04, 2007 06:53 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
jomukuk wrote:
Quote:
He forked-out £7500 to install solar panels on his roof


Check out the amounts of rare metals/elements used in the construction of solar cells. Many have only a few decades before the worlds supply is depleted.

http://www.digitaltvdesignline.com/news/199901448


Solar panels are slightly different where they are used to directly heat water.

I agree on solar cells though. It is a well known fact that solar cells use more energy in their manufactuirng process than the produce in their lifetime of use.

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 04, 2007 08:07 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 14:26
Posts: 4364
Location: Hampshire/Wiltshire Border
Photovoltaic Solar Panels are not a "green" or cost effective way of getting electricity for the reasons given above. However, they can make a saving where they are used to power remote equipment where otherwise, a long cable would have to be laid with its associated costs.

Solar panel sold for water heating are simple "reflectors and pipes" type units and should produce an environmental benefit. Whether they are cost effective is another matter.

_________________
Malcolm W.
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not represent the views of Safespeed.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 04, 2007 09:00 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 13:54
Posts: 1711
Location: NW Kent
civil engineer wrote:
Things I agree with.

Taking care of our 'local environment' smog, locall emmissions, chemical spils etc.

Cutting out waste - better fuel economy, better insulation etc etc

Energy security - better energy mix more nuclear, more renewables (if viable)

All these things make perfect and logical sense to me as a professional and in my personal life.

What I absolutely and fundamentally object to is the big Global warming lie.

I don't need a Bogey Man!!


I'm with you, the only thing I would add is to your 'cutting out waste'

Design products that are made from recyclable (and recycled) materials that are economically viable to recycle or reuse.

_________________
Driving fast is for a particular time and place, I can do it I just only do it occasionally because I am a gentleman.
- James May


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 04, 2007 10:12 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 10:30
Posts: 2053
Location: South Wales (Roving all UK)
I work in the construction industry and 'being a good neighbour' is the right thing to do, it makes commercial sense.

If we, as a nation, need to wean ourselves off Fossil fuels because Russia may soon be holding us over a barrel (nice pun?) then lets be honest and say so.

The whole 'in the name of global warming thing' is reaching ridiculous extremes.

B&Q won't give me a carrier bag.....because of global warming, my council won't collect my rubbish if its not in the wheely bin....to combat global warming! How can people spout such complete bull s4it?????


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 04, 2007 14:44 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 16:34
Posts: 4923
Location: Somewhere between a rock and a hard place
toltec wrote:
I'm with you, the only thing I would add is to your 'cutting out waste'
Design products that are made from recyclable (and recycled) materials that are economically viable to recycle or reuse.


I've posted this on another thread but after a comment like yours I can't resist. I think you'll like it...

http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/newsandevents ... ends_race/

_________________
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not necessarily represent the views of Safe Speed.
You will be branded a threat to society by going over a speed limit where it is safe to do so, and suffer the consequences of your actions in a way criminals do not, more so than someone who is a real threat to our society.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 04, 2007 15:16 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 21:17
Posts: 3734
Location: Dorset/Somerset border
Johnsher wrote:
I can't see BP shares falling anytime soon, in fact ever really, the oil companies know the true situation and will bring out the alternatives when they deem it necessary.


One of my friends did a PHD on some kind of solar energy for BP (I think it was anyway). When he'd finished, they went "We'll have that, thanks very much" and presumably are still sitting on his research.

vistaed wrote:
What has the green movement got to gain?


As an example, I've always liked this quote:

Christine Stewart, Canadian Environment Minister, Calgary Herald 14 Dec 1998 wrote:
“No matter if the science is all phoney, there are collateral environmental benefits.... climate change [provides] the greatest chance to bring about justice and equality in the world.”


The thing that's always puzzled me is the dichotomy between the fact that we're apparently running out of oil (BAD), and that our prodigious use of oil is apparently causing global warming (BAD).

Surely if we use it up at the present rate, global warming will subsequently reduce when it runs out. Alternatively, if we moderate our use of oil in order to make it last longer/ reduce our effect on the climate, we'll be burning oil for longer.

As there is (simplistically) a fixed amount of oil, there is presumably a fixed amount of pollution caused by oil, whether we use it quickly or not :?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 04, 2007 22:39 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 23:42
Posts: 620
Location: Colchester, Essex
The point is that some research has been carried out into the nature of oil and there seems to be evidence that whilst coal does take millions of years to form, oil is continuously produced and takes only a few thousand years to form (some think as little as hundreds of years). There is also a line of thought that says that oil formation is a percolation process and may take only tens of years in the right rock stratum.
Suffice to say that there will always be oil available for us to use, but the oil companies are more than happy to continue with the 'running out' scenario to keep the prices hiked (a bit like DeBeers maintaining the myth that diamonds are rare and ensuring that they are by their own monopoly of them).
A spooky thing about this research is that I stumbled upon it whilst researching something totally unrelated (about light velocities in transluscent minerals - don't ask!) and found several references originating from the brilliant USGS website about three months ago, in the form of 'leader abstracts' prior to publication. In trying to find a hyperlink to post, I cannot now find a single link or search result...
One of the papers was entitled 'Minerality and Formation of Crude Oil - Observations Implying a Review of Timescales', but I cannot remember its source.
If anyone else can find a reference to this research, please post it for me.

_________________
Aquila



Licat volare si super tergum aquila volat...


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 04, 2007 22:43 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
MGBGT wrote:
The point is that some research has been carried out into the nature of oil and there seems to be evidence that whilst coal does take millions of years to form, oil is continuously produced and takes only a few thousand years to form (some think as little as hundreds of years). There is also a line of thought that says that oil formation is a percolation process and may take only tens of years in the right rock stratum.

It's called "abiotic oil" - see here for more information:

http://freeenergynews.com/Directory/The ... index.html

I'm not saying I subscribe to this idea but it's an interesting theory.

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 00:06 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 23:42
Posts: 620
Location: Colchester, Essex
PeterE wrote:
MGBGT wrote:
The point is that some research has been carried out into the nature of oil and there seems to be evidence that whilst coal does take millions of years to form, oil is continuously produced and takes only a few thousand years to form (some think as little as hundreds of years). There is also a line of thought that says that oil formation is a percolation process and may take only tens of years in the right rock stratum.

It's called "abiotic oil" - see here for more information:

http://freeenergynews.com/Directory/The ... index.html

I'm not saying I subscribe to this idea but it's an interesting theory.


Strewth! Another line of investigation! I have heard a few breathings about this in the geological community and the recovery of viable 'plutobacteria' from these super-deep test bores, but the reportage is all a bit 'Mulder and Scully'!
These papers were most definitely centred on the 'normal' oil cycle and the observation that some very 'light' crudes appear to contain prionic DNA fragments from very high mammals which should degrade in small kA timescales.
Alas, I did not make notes as this was a very temporary side-step from the research I was focusing on.

_________________
Aquila



Licat volare si super tergum aquila volat...


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 14:34 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 16:04
Posts: 816
I heard that Mr Environment (Al Gore) has arranged for a LiveEarth concert.

Treehugger.com

Quote:
We reported to you last week that Al Gore is going to be organizing a concert event to even further promote the issue of global warming. Yesterday, the formal announcement came: “The 24-hour event on July 7 is part of a campaign, Save Our Selves -- The Campaign for a Climate in Crisis.” The concerts will take place on seven continents, with concerts in China, South Africa, Australia, London, Japan, Brazil and the United States. It’s said that this concert, dubbed Live Earth, could reach as many as 2 billion people. "In order to solve the climate crisis, we have to reach billions of people,” Al Gore said in a statement. “The climate crisis will only be stopped by an unprecedented and sustained global movement.” More than 100 performers are scheduled to appear, including the Red Hot Chili Peppers, Bon Jovi, Snoop Dogg, Melissa Etheridge, the Foo Fighters, Lenny Kravitz, Sheryl Crow, John Mayer, Duran Duran, Korn, Pharrell, the Black Eyed Peas, Akon, Enrique Iglesias, Faith Hill and Tim McGraw. Proceeds will create a foundation to combat climate change led by The Alliance for Climate Protection, which is chaired by Gore. Don't forget to submit your video about climate change! Visit our Convenient Truths contest to find out more.


So 24 hours of concerts including all the power for the stage lighting, travel for the performers, travel for the caterers, travel for the fans, power and travel for the television and radio crews, travel for Al to promote it, etc, etc.

Can you say irony?

[edited for errors]

_________________
Prepare to be Judged


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 19:30 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
R1Nut wrote:
So 24 hours of concerts including all the power for the stage lighting, travel for the performers, travel for the caterers, travel for the fans, power and travel for the television and radio crews, travel for Al to promote it, etc, etc.

Can you say irony?


Nah...they are playing the "carbon offset" card whereby they pay someone money to invest in tree planting etc and you have a clear conscience.

Its how the rich are going to maintain their lifestyle and still claim environmental credentials................the whole thing is a sick joke.

Its the same as the "carbon neutral" cobblers.

here is a classic from the organisers
Quote:
But organisers are defending themselves. They say the concerts do have a point, will use eco-friendly electricity and sustainable lighting.


WTF does that mean.

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 21:54 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
Gizmo wrote:
here is a classic from the organisers
Quote:
But organisers are defending themselves. They say the concerts do have a point, will use eco-friendly electricity and sustainable lighting.


WTF does that mean.


Only having a concert during a thunderstorm ??? :roll:

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 06, 2007 09:46 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 15:27
Posts: 683
Location: New Forest
I have realised that the £5 environmental levy that Gordon Brown applied to every air traveller was too much. £5 has caused a massive reversal in global warming and we are now suffering from the crappiest summer for years.

A £2.50 rebate to everyone might just give us a few ‘barbeque-days’ before Autumn sets in.

_________________
It's tricky doing nothing - you never know when you're finished


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 06, 2007 17:11 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 16:34
Posts: 4923
Location: Somewhere between a rock and a hard place
What really gets up my green friend's nostrils is them patio heaters springing up everywhere in the back of pubs. I expect we'll see even more now the smokers have been kicked outside.

Say - whatever happened to those coffee cans that self heated? How ungreen was that?


Well, I'm cycling home now. Have a good weekend everyone :)

(I wonder how many miles I had to do to counter the energy and polution my bike created when it was built?)

_________________
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not necessarily represent the views of Safe Speed.
You will be branded a threat to society by going over a speed limit where it is safe to do so, and suffer the consequences of your actions in a way criminals do not, more so than someone who is a real threat to our society.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 06, 2007 17:47 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 14:26
Posts: 4364
Location: Hampshire/Wiltshire Border
Yeah, all that mining, smelting, steel production, welding, machining ...

_________________
Malcolm W.
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not represent the views of Safespeed.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 06, 2007 20:03 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 04:10
Posts: 3244
http://www.grumpyoldsod.com/global%20garbage%204.asp


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 07, 2007 10:05 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
Big Tone wrote:
What really gets up my green friend's nostrils is them patio heaters springing up everywhere in the back of pubs. I expect we'll see even more now the smokers have been kicked outside.


Yup......I know someone in the heating trade. They are forecasting a huge increase in demand for bottled gas as a result.

Also I went by our local pub the other day. There was a mass of fag ends outside. The pavement was a mess.... :x

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 07, 2007 10:14 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 14:26
Posts: 4364
Location: Hampshire/Wiltshire Border
Gizmo wrote:
Yup......I know someone in the heating trade. They are forecasting a huge increase in demand for bottled gas as a result.

By strange Middle-Eastern looking men, no doubt.

_________________
Malcolm W.
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not represent the views of Safespeed.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 07, 2007 20:51 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
Now in a less serious vein , have we cracked the truth about global warming ???

Image

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 296 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 ... 15  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.136s | 10 Queries | GZIP : Off ]