weepej wrote:
Familyman wrote:
I will put my hands up to using my cruise control in 30 limits.
The only thing I switch off is looking for speed cameras and looking at my speedo. With my speed being looked after for me I can spend more time looking for other hazards.
Before I get pigeonholed as a speed kills disciple, I am not, I firmly believe that speed limits are arbitrarily set with little or no concern for safety. I just dont want to pay Gordon another hard earned £60
My stars, you can't keep to a 30 limit and be observant?
How did you pass your test? What brings you to admit to being such a bad driver in public? Control of your vehicle involves monitoring your speed as well you know.
This 'how did you pass your test' jibe comes up quite a bit in these discussions.
People passing their driving tests are fledgling drivers at best. On average their crash risk is around 20 times the national average.
To compare the risk management behaviour of a fledgling driver to the risk management behaviour of an experienced driver is absurd.
As you gain experience, everything changes. Mental skills in visual search and hazard recognition emerge as recoded subconscious processes. Where once using the speedo was an excellent use of your time, you find that scanning ahead takes considerable priority. It's by scanning ahead that you can manage risk and ensure that your speed is safe.
For an experienced responsible driver the speedo becomes far less important - until you add bonkers indiscriminate speed enforcement to the mix. When you do make such an unworthy addition people find coping strategies. I can't say that I think using a cruise control in 30 mph zones strikes me as a worthy coping strategy, but then the authorities are foolishly forcing people to do something, anything.