botach wrote:
Rewolf wrote:
Always use an electrical test screwdriver to check ALL of the exposed metal bits before assuming that they are safe to touch.

Now not being pedantic -
Slight safety mod to that statement Rewolf - before you pull fuses/switch off - check that indicator( screwdriver etc) works - me , i prefer a meter with leads certified to minimum of 600 v , test both wires to earth with earth leg secured - so you only use one hand with no path through heart.
Test meter etc to show it works, then after isolation.
I sometimes also earth both wires , but then all my domestic circuits are RCD protected - old habit from working on telecomms circuits - megger a working telephone circuit at 250 v and charge the bell cap --or circuits where power fed down cable
Now this poses a thought - if you rent and prior to this reg you fitted lights etc - and the landlord requires you to make as on entry - can you do the work??
I guess that to stick with the letter of the regs you would have to employ a P qualified contractor to come and remove your previous work, though having said that, surely removing circuits wouldn't quite fall within the remit of the new regs.
On the subject of testing circuits, one thing that I remember well from the wise old spark that first trained me is that no matter what tester or meter you use, and no matter what means of isolation you have used, the only true final test of whether a wire is dead is to touch it.
So even when you *know* you've isolated and tested a circuit, that first touch is still the final acid test, and should be made with care. An old trick is to make the first touch with the
back of your hand - if it's live you may well find that the hairs stand up on your hand before you actually touch it, and if you get past that, then when you subsequently do get a "belt" the muscle spasms it causes will move your hand away, minimising the duration of the shock you receive. If you touch it with the inside or tip of a finger there is a chance that a live cable will cause your hand to clamp around it, prolonging the shock and maybe turning it into a fatal one.
The actual "mechanics" of death by electric shock are usually not a "frying" process as everyone tends to assume, as the 100mA that typically flows from a domestic shock just won't do that much cooking! No, the villain in the piece is the fact that we use alternating current for our domestic supplies. If you connect yourself such that the current path flows across your heart, then it mis-interprets the alternating waveform as a signal telling it to beat. Thus your heart tries to catch up with the frequency of the current, which at 50 cycles a second it is not going to do. What happens is that the heart gets up to a rate of 2 or 3 beats per second then goes into a state of "fibrillation", which means it half-beats without actually pumping blood.
The irony is that lower voltages don't cause a big enough current flow to cause fibrillation, whilst higher voltages tend to cause such a jolt that they "throw you off" before fibrillation happens. Oh and Direct Current doesn't cause it at all.
So if you were charged with the task (pun intended

) of devising an electricity system best suited for killing people receiving casual shocks, 240V 50Hz AC is probably what you'd go for! It's just a shame that it's also about the most efficient and practical for domestic use.