Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Tue Jun 02, 2026 00:38

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 36 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 12, 2006 16:09 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 14:26
Posts: 4364
Location: Hampshire/Wiltshire Border
What are people's opinions on Peter Snow's "poppy fascism" point of view?

_________________
Malcolm W.
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not represent the views of Safespeed.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 12, 2006 17:06 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
malcolmw wrote:
What are people's opinions on Peter Snow's "poppy fascism" point of view?


What's that then? Where can I read about it?

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 12, 2006 17:21 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 14:26
Posts: 4364
Location: Hampshire/Wiltshire Border
I'm sure Peter Snow will forgive me for paraphrasing him so ...

Peter Snow's Opinion wrote:
I don't want to be bullied into wearing a poppy on air. I wear one privately but I am fed up with people writing in saying that this or other newsreader wasn't wearing a poppy 2 weeks before Remembrance Sunday. There have even been complaints about wearing poppies on the "wrong side" of your jacket. I get lots of requests to wear affiliation regalia (aids, gays, breast cancer, etc.) but I don't wear any of them. Poppies fall into the same category.


Interestingly, I sort of feel the same. I started religiously wearing a poppy in my suit a few years ago in view of what people at work and customers might think if I didn't display one. It was really social pressure not my own decision.

I don't think you need to go to church to worship God. You only need to go if you want others to see you.

_________________
Malcolm W.
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not represent the views of Safespeed.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 12, 2006 17:34 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 19:50
Posts: 3369
Location: Lost in the Wilderness
It's funny I went to Morrison’s today and while there they announced a two minute silence, me and the wife stood still as well as many others, some carried on shopping.

_________________
Useless laws weaken necessary laws.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 12, 2006 20:50 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 15:43
Posts: 2416
I can sort of see where Peter Snow is coming from. I imagine that having a famous face makes you an instant target for every good cause to ask you to show your support in front of the cameras, and there's no way anyone can support them all. And when it comes to poppies the past have sacrifice of lives for freedom must mean that those who choose to not wear a poppy are free to do so. I still feel that I should drop a few quid in the box each November and have my poppy seen, and I think the arguments for everyone joining in are sound. But that's a long way from telling anyone that they must do it.

_________________
Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler - Einstein


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 12, 2006 21:22 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2004 23:42
Posts: 3820
malcolmw wrote:
I'm sure Peter Snow will forgive me for paraphrasing him so ...

Peter Snow's Opinion wrote:
I don't want to be bullied into wearing a poppy on air. I wear one privately but I am fed up with people writing in saying that this or other newsreader wasn't wearing a poppy 2 weeks before Remembrance Sunday. There have even been complaints about wearing poppies on the "wrong side" of your jacket. I get lots of requests to wear affiliation regalia (aids, gays, breast cancer, etc.) but I don't wear any of them. Poppies fall into the same category.


Interestingly, I sort of feel the same. I started religiously wearing a poppy in my suit a few years ago in view of what people at work and customers might think if I didn't display one. It was really social pressure not my own decision.

I don't think you need to go to church to worship God. You only need to go if you want others to see you.


You do not have to go to church to prove you care or are a good person.

You can choose .. those gentleman and ladies of the past sacrificed their lives for our rights to choose.

I choose to wear a red poppy for a noble war and a white poppy to to show that whilst I revere the sacrifice of one.. I reserve the right to abhor warfare.

I thinki we are at the old crossfire.

The French banned the wearing of all religious allegiances in their schools and public offices.

BA told staff not to wear a crucifix - but allowed the veil and the skull cap and Silkh turban.

Fiona Bruce cannot wear a fave crucific=x pendant .. but others can wear their headscarf...


I think the French are correct.. wear in private .. wear i according tro dress code of various private employers but as a public officcer serving he public.. you have to be seen as "neutral" if you are to deliver an ubiased professional opinion.

But like Gatsomate.. I put cash in the poppy tins as this helps supporrt soldiers injured and killed in conflict. I do not have to wear the Poppy and I sometimes sing a very poignant song - by "Sting" about poppies - double edged, sharp edged and I think perhaps timeless. I am sure you know the one.. from his first solo album :wink:

_________________
Take with a chuckle or a grain of salt
Drive without COAST and it's all your own fault!

A SMILE is a curve that sets everything straight (P Diller).

A Smiley Per post
FINES USfor our COAST!


Approach love and cooking with reckless abandon - but driving with a smile and a COAST calm mind.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 00:37 
Offline
Former Police Officer
Former Police Officer
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 00:27
Posts: 351
Embarressingly enough, having served in the Army for 11 years (I left 12 years ago) this year was I made my first trips to the fields of the Somme and Ypres

The first was in May to the Somme valley on my motorbike as I made my way to a meeting in France. I too was struck by the event and key points for me were

Theipval Memorial
The Crater at Ovillers
The Newfoundland memorial
Dulville Woods

The latter was quite possibly one of the most moving experiences of my life

In October I drove my father in law over to Belgium. We visited the graves of his wifes Uncle and My Grandmothers Brother. We also visited the memorial on which his own uncles name is carved, he has no known grave.

The act of rememberance is not glorification of war, it is all about paying tribute to those who bravely fell on the battlefields. It should also be noted that the British Legion relies on the poppy sales to continue their impressive work with ex forces in need. It is the shame of this country that our servicemen and women and their families have to rely on a charity.

_________________
Former Military Police Officer and accident investigator


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 01:13 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 00:15
Posts: 5232
Location: Windermere
I joined the British Legion, as with several relatives in the forces a few years ago, I know first hand of the work they still do, because of the numerous conflicts.
This year I made a donation, but did not wear a poppy - it snags in my clothing at work, and I dont wear a suit.
I DO have a poppy car sticker in my car which is there all year round.

I sympathise with Peter Snow - as a business I am always being asked to support some appeal or other, or supply raffle prizes for a good cause.

I choose to support charities which are associated with my youngest sons premature birth, and since you just cannot help them all, I now try to support those who dont have the public attention, more than those that do in an effort to redress the balance.
Lately I have found out more about Riding for the Disabled - it had not occured to me that this was theraputic, and not just enabling them to partake in a wider range of activities.

If ANY of you donate to a charity, I would urge you to do so via GIFT AID.
This enables the charity concerned to claim back the tax you paid on the money when you earned it!
Charities take your donation (which is money you’ve already paid tax on), and then reclaim tax on its ‘gross’ equivalent (its value before tax was deducted) at the basic rate of 22 per cent.

In practice, this means that if you give £10 to charity using Gift Aid, that gift is worth £12.82 to the charity. This is because 22 per cent of £12.82 is £2.82 – your £10 being the difference.

_________________
Time to take responsibility for our actions.. and don't be afraid of speaking out!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 11:04 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 20:28
Posts: 1267
Location: not too far in front, not too far behind.
Zamzara wrote:
I can see Paul's point. Of course remembrance services are not intended to suggest that war is noble or glorious, far from it. But as a child when I was first exposed to them, it was the impression I got nevertheless: that war was in some strange way romantic. I don't really know why. It might be a side effect of the deep emotions involved.


I used to have that perception until I read the war poetry of Wilfrid Owen and Siegfried Sassoon and others.

If it wasn't enough that all of human experience is captured in poetry and prose, that is enough reason for the continuance of teaching English Literature alongside those more "practical" skills in schools.

_________________
COAST Not just somewhere to keep a beach.

A young loner on a crusade to champion the cause of the innocent, the helpless, the powerless, in a world of criminals who operate above the law.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 14:20 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 18:54
Posts: 4036
Location: Cumbria
malcolmw wrote:
I don't think you need to go to church to worship God. You only need to go if you want others to see you.


I think the second half of that is maybe a bit unfair. Lots of people (OK a diminishing number of people!) go to church because they want to be with like-minded people for an hour or so on a Sunday and spend a bit of time somewhere they can "feel" God a bit more than in other surroundings. In today's secular society, I really like going into churces where it's quiet, reverent, and you can think about things. In small villages (like where I live) I think it's also still a social focal point as much as anything else. Like the village pub / post office, something that helps bind the community together.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 14:23 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 18:54
Posts: 4036
Location: Cumbria
Peter Snow's Opinion wrote:
I don't want to be bullied into wearing a poppy on air. I wear one privately but I am fed up with people writing in saying that this or other newsreader wasn't wearing a poppy 2 weeks before Remembrance Sunday. There have even been complaints about wearing poppies on the "wrong side" of your jacket. I get lots of requests to wear affiliation regalia (aids, gays, breast cancer, etc.) but I don't wear any of them. Poppies fall into the same category.


I can see his point and I don't wear one for long but I can see the sense in all public figures wearing one for a few days leading up to the day. TV is such a powerful medium and people are so much like sheep! I think wearing one for a fortnight dilutes the importane of the actual day each year that has been set aside for this (in my view) extremely important cause but everyone wearing one on the day would, I feel, be a good thing and TV personalities are often far more influential than anyone else.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 14:37 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 00:24
Posts: 2400
Location: Kendal, Cumbria
SafeSpeed wrote:
I'm going to go against the grain here and admit that I'm seriously uncomfortable with this 'remembrance' thing.

On the one hand I am truly grateful that we have been protected from evil dictators, but on the other hand I can't accept the glory of war aspects.

When our fighters are heroes to be remembered for their service, I cannot help but believe that such a position makes further wars with further death and destruction more likely, not less.

If something is to be remembered, surely it should be great evil, so that we might avoid it in future?

If you aren't prepared to fight for good, then evil will flourish.

Remembrance day is to pay our respects to those who fought to stop evil; and also to lay down a marker that even after all these years we'd do so again.

It isn't glorifying the war against evil, but it IS advertising the fact that we are prepared to fight it, if needs must. It is, perhaps, Wilfrid Owen's "Next War":

"We laughed, knowing that better men would come,
And greater wars; when each proud fighter brags
He wars on Death - for Life; not men - for flags"

_________________
CSCP Latin for beginners...
Ticketo ergo sum : I scam therefore I am!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 15:55 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
JT wrote:
SafeSpeed wrote:
If something is to be remembered, surely it should be great evil, so that we might avoid it in future?

If you aren't prepared to fight for good, then evil will flourish.


I agree but the question remains, when do you start fighting?

I think it should be as late as possible, but I also think that the rememberence thing tends to make it sooner. That's my concern.

This is also an opinion that I've held - or maybe felt is better - for some 4 decades now, and nothing has tended to make me change my mind.

Maybe being a teenager at the time of the Vietnam war has something to do with it. My opinion isn't now likely to change because the good people around here are telling me that rememberence is supposed to mean something else. I agree with you all.

The most common expression of remberence seems to be: 'remembering those that gave their lives so that we could be free'. In the way that this is presented, those that died are bathed in 'greatness'. This is what I find wrong. The proper typical expression of rememberence should be something much more like: 'war is hell, and should be avoided as much as possible'.

And I ask you all - did remberence help or hinder us to get involved in our devastating Iraq folly?

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 17:12 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 00:24
Posts: 2400
Location: Kendal, Cumbria
SafeSpeed wrote:
JT wrote:
SafeSpeed wrote:
If something is to be remembered, surely it should be great evil, so that we might avoid it in future?

If you aren't prepared to fight for good, then evil will flourish.


I agree but the question remains, when do you start fighting?

If you can convince the potential evil-doer beyond all doubt that you will respond swiftly and ruthlessly, then you might not need to fight at all. Perhaps Remembrance helps with that a little.

But in any case, at least to me, Remembrance is not about the glorification of war, rather it is a simple gesture of respect and of gratitude to all those who died. When I buy a poppy the thought that runs through my mind is simply "thanks"; and if it leaves any other message it is to make the most of the legacy that they died to leave us - a legacy of freedom.

I don't really think anyone now looks back on any recent wars and sees them as a thing of glory, indeed I think it was the Great War that finally put paid to all that dulce et decorum est line of thinking.

But if any doubt remains, for a real treatise on trench life I thoroughly recommend you go and read the novel The First Casualty by - of all people - Ben Elton.

_________________
CSCP Latin for beginners...
Ticketo ergo sum : I scam therefore I am!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 19:49 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 09:59
Posts: 3544
Location: Shropshire
SafeSpeed wrote:
The most common expression of remberence seems to be: 'remembering those that gave their lives so that we could be free'. In the way that this is presented, those that died are bathed in 'greatness'. This is what I find wrong. The proper typical expression of rememberence should be something much more like: 'war is hell, and should be avoided as much as possible'.


I have never attended a remebrence service where any implications or expressions of heroism, greatness, victoriousness were used; only expessions of sorrow, of loss of friends and comrades, of hope and of the debt that is owed. But ultimately the remembrence means what you want it to mean, it is explained in the heart and the soul, not the head. Perhaps that is why some with a certain predisposition will fail to connect and inevitably misunderstand.

Remembrence neither helped nor hindered our involvement in the Iraq conflict, nor the Gulf war nor the Falklands; political events took their course regardless. But the fact that it didn't prevent these conflicts is not in itself reason to deem it unworthy or not fit for purpose.
The nation should remember, if it doesn't then we may as well just succumb to any tin pot force that rattles a sabre.

I sign off with another quote, one whose origins I regretably forget:

"A nation that fails to respect its own history soon comes to respect the history of another"


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 21:17 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 16:37
Posts: 265
Rigpig wrote:
I sign off with another quote, one whose origins I regretably forget:

"A nation that fails to respect its own history soon comes to respect the history of another"


I don't know. but it sounds very Benjamin Franklin


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 36 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.020s | 11 Queries | GZIP : Off ]