SafeSpeed wrote:
I want to create a "Brainstorming" forum where people shouldn't be afraid to post wild ideas. In my experience a lot of excellent and original thinking develops from wild beginnings. Of course I'd expect 80% of it to be dross, but then that's well worth it for even 5% of pure gold.
Yes, worth a try, but needs a strong guideline not to simply engage in the "usual" arguments.
Quote:
There's a huge overlap between "Improving Road Safety" and "Speed, Safety, Driving and The Law". So much so that I think the categories must be wrong. It's not that people post to the wrong forum, it's more that the thread contents overlap. It's possible that a stronger definition would help. It's not working out as I imagined. I'd imagined that "Improving Road Safety" would contain discussions based on initial posts expressing single ideas, but it doesn't seem to be working like that at all.
There is a distinction there, although it seems very blurred and, as you say, there's a large overlap. I think "Improving Road Safety" is worth keeping, not least because it reinforces the message the site is not primarily about defending prosecutions.
Quote:
"CSCP Refugees" seems rather redundant presently since the CSCP forum didn't actually break up. Should I delete it or merge it with another forum? Or lock it, move it down and call it historical? Or leave it just in case?
I'd keep it, but lock it. Presumably it can be unlocked in future if necessary.
Do we need "Hidden Anonymous Submissions" as it doesn't seem to get any use?
Also the four forums right at the bottom are scarcely used either.
I might move "Polls" into the discussion forums area as it is something that can be used by everyone and not really a "Special Forum".