| Author |
Message |
Forum: Campaigning Topic: M4 Protest |
| tisri |
|
Posted: Fri Apr 22, 2005 20:40
|
|
Replies: 337
Views: 189519
|
| However this has been thrown out of the window in favour of lower limits and rigid enforcement of those limits and the removal of traffic police. May be it would be a more convincing argument if you could separate the issues a bit here? It seems you object to three things: 1) Lowering speed limits.... |
|
 |
Forum: Campaigning Topic: M4 Protest |
| tisri |
|
Posted: Fri Apr 22, 2005 20:32
|
|
Replies: 337
Views: 189519
|
| because they are often placed in such a way that normal motorists have to continually monitor speed rather than look out for hazards... monitoring your speed is just one of many things a driver has to do - it's not difficult, it's not dangerous...I do it every journey I make with complete success. ... |
|
|
Forum: Campaigning Topic: M4 Protest |
| tisri |
|
Posted: Thu Apr 21, 2005 23:19
|
|
Replies: 337
Views: 189519
|
| you sados really have nothing better in your pathetic little lives... grow up and live. cars kill people. roads kill everything else. go fuck yourselves. we will be protesting against you- be sure of that. Funny, my car hasn't killed anyone. If you want to protest try weaving through the protest tr... |
|
|
Forum: Campaigning Topic: M4 Protest |
| tisri |
|
Posted: Thu Apr 21, 2005 23:17
|
|
Replies: 337
Views: 189519
|
| So which part of my post do you disagree with then? Do you have/need to break the speed limit? The simple fact is that there are times when it is safer to accelerate away from a situation, possibly temporarily breaking the speed limit, to preserve safety. Imagine driving at a steady 70mph on the mo... |
|
|
| Sort by: |
Login
Register
FAQ
Search
Members