| Author |
Message |
Forum: Pages Topic: Proof |
| nevatre |
|
Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2006 20:51
|
|
Replies: 25
Views: 89480
|
| OK, so move all those to the non speeding set. Then we have the speeding set that didn't even get crash involved. This is a very odd comment. I think you understand exactly my original point - your logic is flawed because you can say nothing about the free travelling speed of drivers killing and in... |
|
 |
Forum: Pages Topic: Proof |
| nevatre |
|
Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2006 09:14
|
|
Replies: 25
Views: 89480
|
| How does it follow that 65% of the 15712 casualties were struck by a car that had been speeding? It might be that all 15712 casualties were struck by cars that had not been speeding. Unless you have extra evidence your conclusion is unsupported. So, your logic is flawed. I didn't address your purpos... |
|
|
Forum: Speed, Safety, Driving and The Law Topic: Slower is Safer |
| nevatre |
|
Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2006 00:48
|
|
Replies: 38
Views: 14928
|
| Let me describe two accidents to you. I was present at one, and heard first hand from an eye witness of the other. 1. I was a passenger, travelling to work in the morning, on a bus on a busy A-road with a speed limit of 60 mph (These are the most dangerous roads in terms of the number of fatal accid... |
|
|
Forum: Pages Topic: Proof |
| nevatre |
|
Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2006 00:09
|
|
Replies: 25
Views: 89480
|
| A minor point, would you provide the references in the appropriate published tables. I have the number of pedestrian casualties excluding deaths as 15819-107=15712 from table 33 in http://www.dft.gov.uk/stellent/groups/dft_transstats/documents/page/dft_transstats_024330.pdf Your logic is flawed: the... |
|
|
| Sort by: |
Login
Register
FAQ
Search
Members